Results 1 to 20 of 2113

Thread: Syria in 2017 (January-April)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Nothing like Turkey selling out it's own FP statements......just to have a meaningless deal with Russia..notice no additional economic help outside of a vague pipeline deal...

    "We can no longer insist on a settlement without Assad. We want US to be at the table. We want them to be involved" - Turkish Deputy PM:

  2. #2
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Heavy clashes also underway at Deir Ezzor's 137 Brigade base, with some claims of IS having breached its walls

    DeirEzzor: Many fake news about the military situation in #DeirEzzor by pro-#Assad accounts today.

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Trump's secretary of state Tillerson takes Putin's - not Obama's - position on Syria: separates Assad and ISIS.
    http://www.businessinsider.com/tille...s-plan-2017-1#
    Attached Images Attached Images

  4. #4
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    ISIS vid from fighting in northern Syria: Destroyed Leopard 2A4s. Performance of German MBT vs ATGM rather mediocre.
    Last edited by davidbfpo; 01-20-2017 at 09:46 PM.

  5. #5
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    New Satellite Imagery Shows Russian Su-24 Jets at the Hmeimim Air Base via @bellingcat
    https://www.bellingcat.com/news/mena...mim-air-base/#

  6. #6
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    849

    Default Surprise, Russia’s Anti-Aircraft Missiles in Syria Are Not as Capable as Believed

    by GUY PLOPSKY at War is Boring (originally published at The National Interest): https://warisboring.com/surprise-rus...c92#.lp7zc07vc

    When Moscow deployed one of its advanced S-400 surface-to-air missile system to Syria following the shoot down of a Russian Su-24 strike aircraft by a Turkish F-16 in late November 2015, both Russian and Western media sources were quick to note that the system is capable of engaging targets at ranges of up to 400 kilometers thanks to a new long-range missile known as the 40N6.

    Similar assertions were made following subsequent deployments of S-400 systems to Kaliningrad and Crimea. Yet, more than a year after the deployment to Syria, there is little evidence to suggest that the 40N6 is in fact operational.

    Much of the confusion on whether the 40N6 has been fielded with the S-400 system has to do with another advanced Russian SAM system — known as the S-300V4 — which Russian troops began receiving in late 2014.
    In March 2015, the Russian Defense Ministry announced that a new unspecified 400 kilometer-range missile intended for use with the S-300V4 had entered service with Russia’s military, leading a number of Russian media sources to assume that the missile in question is the 40N6.
    These assumptions, however, proved wrong.

    The following month, a Russian defense source told Russia’s TASS news agency that a new long-range missile for the S-400 system was scheduled to complete state trails in May-June of the same year. The source further noted that “the range of the new missile is the same as that of the recently adopted missile for the S-300V4 army air defense system,” but possess superior characteristics.

    Although the Defense Ministry source did not name the S-400 system’s new missile, the above statement was a clear reference to the 40N6. In fact, hints that the S-300V4 and the S-400 would utilize different missiles with similar ranges emerged following a February 2015 article in the authoritative Russian-language aerospace journal Vozdushno-Kosmicheskaya Oborona in which its authors mentioned a new long-range missile for the S-300V4 known as the 9M82MV.

    According to the article, the 9M82MV was successfully tested in 2004 and 2006, and is capable of intercepting targets at up to 350 kilometers away.
    Final confirmation that the 40N6 is different from the missile utilized in the S-300V4 system came in September 2016 when a representative of the Almaz-Antey Concern — the primary manufacturer of the S-300V4 — told reporters that the S-300V4 will utilize a new 400 kilometer-range missile known as the 9M82MD.

    Unlike the 40N6 which is developed by the Fakel Machine-building Design Bureau, the 9M82MD is developed by the Novator Design Bureau, meaning that this missile is clearly not the 40N6.

    Further evidence for the absence of the 40N6 in Russian SAM units can be found in images of S-400 systems deployed in Syria and elsewhere.
    A quick online search of the S-400 system’s transporter-erector-launchers reveals images in which they are visible only in its “typical” configuration — that is with four paired missile container-launchers.

    Given that the S-400’s 48N6DM/48N6E3 missiles, which have a claimed maximum operational range of 250 kilometers, occupy the entire length of the container-launcher, it is quite possible that the longer-ranged — and presumably bigger — 40N6 requires a larger container-launcher.

    This means a single TEL may only be able to carry two such missiles.
    Indeed, the S-300V4 system’s TELs that transport the large 200 kilometer-range 9M82M and 400 kilometer-range 9M82MD missiles are fitted with just two large container-launchers per vehicle. It is therefore not unreasonable to assume that the new missile is not yet operational.

  7. #7
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    While we watched the #inaugiration distraction, Russia & Syria signed a 50-year agreement for deployment of RU nuclear subs/ships.at Syria.

    Here's the full text of the unannounced treaty that makes Syria a de facto perpetual free military base of Russia
    http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Docu...pe=pdf#…

    Up to 11 [nuclear] ships will be able to dock in at any time. Agreement
    automatically extended for 25 further years after inital 49 term.

    * RU has no-cost right to use Syrian territory for deployment of its bases
    * Syrian gov't have no right of access
    * Full immunity for RU

    BOTTOM LINE UP FRONT.....

    Even if the anti Assad opposition gets into power. and Assad is thrown out...they still have to deal with Putin and Russia for 49 plus 25 years...Syria is now effectively part and parcel of the Russian sphere of influence FOREVER....

    Thanks to Obama ditching 70 odd years of US ME FP and we will be thanking trump as well as he wants to eradicate IS using Russia and Assad and IRAN.....

Similar Threads

  1. Syria in 2017 (April-December)
    By SWJ Blog in forum Middle East
    Replies: 563
    Last Post: 12-28-2017, 05:39 AM
  2. Hizbullah / Hezbollah (just the group)
    By SWJED in forum Middle East
    Replies: 176
    Last Post: 12-19-2017, 12:58 PM
  3. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 11-22-2017, 03:43 PM
  4. Russo-Ukraine War 2017 (January-April)
    By davidbfpo in forum Europe
    Replies: 1093
    Last Post: 04-29-2017, 10:25 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •