Results 1 to 20 of 61

Thread: What are you currently reading in 2017?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member Backwards Observer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    511

    Default hammer of witches

    Black Sun by Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke


    Chinese Negotiating Behaviour by Richard H. Solomon



  2. #2
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    861

    Default

    A Failed Empire: The Soviet Union in the Cold War from Stalin to Gorbachev (New Cold War History)
    by Vladislav M. Zubok

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/..._Failed_Empire

    I am more than halfway through this book, and it is interesting, informative and frequently enlightening (as in shedding new light on old topics).
    Well worth a read (but then again, I am just an amateur reader, what do the experts say?)

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,169

    Default America's Other Army

    America's Other Army: The U.S. Foreign Service and 21st Century Diplomacy, by Nicholas Kralev

    https://www.amazon.com/Americas-Othe.../dp/1466446560

    I have been to Foggy Bottom (Dept of State Headquarters in Wash D.C.) several times, and worked with numerous U.S. Embassies in different parts of the world, but I still gained valuable insights from this book that I haven't picked up elsewhere.

    While the Department of State (DOS) as an organization is more dysfunctional than the Department of Defense, the people who serve in the Foreign Service for the most part are true patriots and exceptionally talented.

    The author's intent beyond explaining the role of diplomacy was to put a human face on it, by interviewing numerous foreign service officers and Secretaries of State. I had the good fortune of listening to the author speak once, and he provided additional insights that unfortunately were not in the book, but the bottom line is he is was well qualified to write this book.

    Since the book was written in 2012 there is a lot of attention given to shock that our operations and Iraq and Afghanistan generated in the DOS, and how they adapted.

    Throughout the book there were insightful views from these officers you don't hear during the spin sessions when the public affairs representative presents the DOS's official position. Such as our strategic communications is overly focused on manipulating and spinning, which makes us look like hypocrites. What people around the world really want is for us to trust them enough to be honest with them. They don't have to like our policies, but we should honestly explain them.

    The unpopular war in Iraq was an immense challenge for the DOS, even if the individual officers didn't agree with it, they still had to defend the policy. The impact on the Counselor Service was significant, since their mission was to increase to U.S. visitors and student visas, but at the same time now had to go through a very thorough and deliberate process to approve visas, which resulted in a significant reduction of visitors and students. The reason for doing so was understood, but the goal of increasing visitors while increasing security checks was extremely challenging.

    One of the more interesting aspects for me was the lack of guidance these officers get when they get an assignment. Iraq was a perfect example, where officers were sent out to the various parts of Iraq with the goal of stabilizing the country. It was beneficial in some regards, because it gave the diplomats with the wherewithal to do so great latitude to figure out the problems and come up with creative solutions. For others, they struggled. This issue is bigger than Iraq though, the author points out that very foreign service officers in 2003 could explain how their activities tied into national interests and supported the goals in the National Security Strategy, but that number has reduced significantly. Largely due to efforts by Colin Powell and Hillary Clinton to produce Diplomatic and Development Strategies that nested with the NSS.

    When Powell assume the SecState position, he was shocked to discover how unprepared the FS was to do their job. Understaffed, outdated technology, and no real training/education to prepare them for their positions.

    The draw back to this modernization and growth is that the DOS is becoming a large bureaucracy, and as a result the diplomats who should be learning the local culture and gaining a deep understanding of the host nation's issues to inform U.S. policies are now increasingly becoming bureaucrats that have little time to engage with the locals. Instant communication is impacting the DOS as much as DoD. The ability to communicate instantly is resulting in more and more power consolidating higher up, striping Ambassadors and others of authorities they used to have. They call it e-hell (we're brothers in arms after all). Not in the book, but I remember Susan Rice stating she does strategy, not the Ambassadors, they just implement it what she tells them. A very dangerous place to be when we have the blind leading the country, and those informed of the situation marginalized. The author states there is a long term cost to pay when FS officers are neither expected nor challenged to become top foreign policy strategists and thinkers, figuring we can just bring in political appointees for that.

  4. #4
    Council Member Backwards Observer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    511

    Default i plot your rubric scarab

    Cold War Anthropology by David H. Price


    Perilous Interventions by Hardeep Singh Puri



  5. #5
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    861

    Default

    My review of "Failed Empire" (which I think is a must-read book)

    A must read for anyone interested in the history of the Soviet empire and its eventual (almost bloodless) fall under Gorbachev. The author presents an inside look at the Soviet side of events and some very interesting re-evaluations of the various leaders (from a Russian perspective). For example, the fact that Brezhnev was a much more grounded and sensible operator than his late drug-addled senile years would imply; that Gorbachev was a wooly idealist who was unfortunately or fortunately almost hopelessly inept at actually running things; that Bush senior was a competent executor of American interests; that Reagan's inner peacemaker/decent human being were far more important in bringing down the Soviet Union than his SDI or military buildup (which the author regards as almost incidental and of little significance in events); that money simply running out had a lot to do with the fall of the Soviet empire in East Europe; that failed ideology led to cynicism and a simultaneous nave optimism about social democracy in the 1960s generation, and so on.
    The author has a Russo-centric view and for most Russians the fact that the Soviet experiment failed is not enough reason to accept that the Russian empire (which predated and undergirded the Soviet experiment) and the vast, ambitious and (sometimes at great cost and with great cruelty) expansion of the Russian peoples across Eurasia should also be setback THIS far as a result of that failure. Outsiders may wish to take a more forgiving view of Gorbachev, who managed to let all this happen without bloodshed.
    Anyway, well worth reading. IN fact, a must read if you are interested in those times and those events.

  6. #6
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,169

    Default

    https://www.amazon.com/Twilight-Warr...light+warriors

    Twilight Warriors: The Soldiers, Spies, and Special Agents Who Are Revolutionizing the American Way of War
    by James Kitfield

    Throughout this book, the author focuses on how the military, law enforcement, and intelligence adapted to a new way of war despite the challenges posed by the failed policies of both the Bush and Obama administrations. It is a very human versus an analytical story, with numerous personal insights provided by some of the senior leaders involved. Some minor errors (related to what unit did what) in the book didn’t distract from an overall balanced account of our nation’s war on violent extremist organizations.

    I admire the likes of GENs Petraeus, McCrystal, Dempsey, and Special Agent McCauley among others for their ability to build teams and solve difficult problems. Those who repeatedly claim the military is not innovative are either blind, or unfortunately served in bad organization that clung to rigid doctrines. Intelligence, law enforcement, and the military innovated significantly since 9/11. Much of it centered on networking, both technical and human.

    The chapter on enhanced interrogation in the early part of the book effectively exposed Panetta for spinning the narrative on the effectiveness of the enhanced interrogation program, by deliberately trying to take credit for the FBI’s successful interrogation of a key AQ member, when in fact the CIA’s method resulted in shutting him down. When you read how the CIA conducted the interrogation, you would think it was conducted by a couple of sadistic high school kids. The only reasoning behind it was to break down the subject. Nonetheless, it resulted in a multimillion dollar contract for these clowns to continue, which left a stain on America and the values it represents. However, that shouldn’t reflect on the heroic work the CIA officers are doing downrange and the competence of their analysts, which the author emphasizes.

    However, the real story in this book is about the men and women who transformed our security services and soldiered on despite incompetent politicians and failed policies. The author also demonstrates you can tell a good story without exposing classified information. Overall a decent and quick read.

  7. #7
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    115

    Default

    I am patiently awaiting the release of the first book about DET-A Berlin:

    https://www.amazon.com/Special-Force...dp/161200444X/

    I'm hoping it will provide some insight into how the Cold War was fought in Eastern Europe and how the Baltic States could be defended moving forward.

    Until then, and while I'm focused on the Hacking 4 Defense Educator's Course starting here in Washington DC:

    Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion

    ....highly recommended and only $1.99 right now on Kindle. Awesome value.

    https://www.amazon.com/Influence-Psy...dp/B002BD2UUC/

    Sprint: How to Solve Big Problems and Test New Ideas in Just 5 Days:

    https://www.amazon.com/Sprint-Solve-...dp/B010MH1DAQ/

    The Lean StartUp:

    https://www.amazon.com/Lean-Startup-...dp/B004J4XGN6/

    Thinking Fast And Slow:

    https://www.amazon.com/Thinking-Fast...dp/B00555X8OA/

    Steal Like an Artist:

    https://www.amazon.com/Steal-Like-Ar...dp/B0074QGGK6/

    Everything by Dr Tina Seelig(creativity & innovation):

    Innovation Engine (Enhanced Edition with video & audio): A Crash Course on Creativity is only $6.99

    https://www.amazon.com/Tina%20Seelig...rnid=618072011

    I buy tons of books. These are some of the very best I've found in recent years on creativity, innovation, and problem solving.

Similar Threads

  1. Small Wars: a wide reading list
    By YellowJack in forum RFIs & Members' Projects
    Replies: 73
    Last Post: 11-23-2013, 01:30 PM
  2. Call for Professional Reading Lists
    By DDilegge in forum RFIs & Members' Projects
    Replies: 79
    Last Post: 04-21-2013, 09:50 PM
  3. A Counter Terrorism reading list
    By davidbfpo in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 03-11-2011, 10:45 PM
  4. Adding "Add all to cart" feature to Reading List page
    By Rose in forum Small Wars Council / Journal
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-08-2010, 02:07 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •