Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Indian War parallels

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,188

    Default Unseen Smoke Signals

    I couldn't argue against the Indian wars analogy. Most everything we need to know is already there. One nagging element of comparison is the problems caused by translators who either by incompetence or complicity create all kinds of tactical and political problems. The classic example IMHO occured in 1877 when Crazy Horse the principal war leader of the Lakota brought in his band. They came in fully armed, undefeated. At the same time, Chief Joseph and Looking Glass of the Nez Perce were causing problems to the West. Crazy Horse was approached in an effort to enlist his help against the Nez Perce. Lakota oral tradition tells that during the meeting of some Officers and Crazy Horse, CH told them, " I will fight them until they are no more". There were several Lakota present at this meeting. The interpretor told the Officers present that CH said, " I will fight you until you are no more". This then caused his attempted arrest and subsequent killing. This in turn caused Sitting Bull to keep his band out for another 5 years and many Lakota say the killing of CH was a prime factor in the Lakota participation in the Ghost Dancing, which in turn caused more problems in 1890. The last Indian combat occured in 1973 at Wounded Knee II when Lakota militants occupied that site and had a stand off. Federal forces, Marshals and FBI, and Indian warriors exchanged gunfire more than once. This action also resulted in a fire fight at the Jumping Bull compound later on which resulted in 2 Marshals KIA. Incidentally, there was Ghost Dancing at Wounded Knee II and at least one authentic Ghost Dance shirt from the previous dust-up was worn. Two Medicine Men, Crow Dog and his Uncle, played a significant role at WK II. I don't think we've ever fully understood the interplay of spirituality and combat but that's a topic for another discussion. It's all been done already starting with King Philip's War in the 1600s to Wounded Knee II in 1973.

  2. #2
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,169

    Default I don't see it

    I read the article, and personally think the author is grasping at straws. The Indian wars were not wars of ideology, but rather conquest and while not genocide, it was definitely was racial/cultural. We're coming, join us or get on your reservation.

    It was largely an internal war; though other nations used the Indians as surrogates throughout the years.

    The war we're fighting now is global (with a homeland defense requirement), it is a war of ideology (political religion) that ultimately will decide what laws and economic models those being fought over will live under. It is a war that is waged on the internet, in the media, mosques around the world, and it is not restricted to tribes (Anyone can become a Muslim from Indonesian, Thailand, N. Africa, Ohio, Canada, etc. regardless of race, not everyone can become an Indian), cover actions, and overtly on the battlefied. It is very much like the cold war, except the nation state (with the possible exception of Iran) isn't the main the threat. Our objective isn't total defeat (we can't do it), but rather to win over large segments of the Muslim population to a non-radical view. During the Cold War our objective was win over large segments of the global population from communism to other forms of government and economic models (we didn't start pushing democracy that hard until after the collapse of the USSR, we didn't have that luxury until then).

    There may be several loose parallels to the Indian wars, but it is a stretch, and not near as close a parallel as the Cold War in my opinion.

  3. #3
    Council Member 120mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Wonderland
    Posts
    1,284

    Default

    I think the current GWOT is very very parallel to the 300 years Indian War on the N. American continent, in theme. Two conflicting cultures which are non-compatible;

    The role of "young bucks" committing acts of terror, regardless of their elders.

    The back and forth "embracing of the noble savages" alternating with "kill all the bastards" attitude..

    Yep, very familiar.

    The settling of the West was not a planned, purposeful event, uniformly supported. The farther you headed East, the more sympathy there was for the Indian, and blame for the settlers. The rhetoric in the press was similar, also. Lots of "noble savage" publishing, but Easterners could get worked up right after an Indian massacre.

  4. #4
    Moderator Steve Blair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    There are certain strong similarities, but the parallel is not exact. But I also don't see much similarity with the Cold War model. The parallels with the Indian Wars are mostly in the tactical and operational areas. The only similarity I see with the Cold War is the scope of the AO.

    Pressed for time now. When I have a chance I'll post some of the Indian Wars parallels I see. Been doing a fair amount of thinking about this one.
    "On the plains and mountains of the American West, the United States Army had once learned everything there was to learn about hit-and-run tactics and guerrilla warfare."
    T.R. Fehrenbach This Kind of War

  5. #5
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    499

    Default

    It occurs to me that there are some similarities between the Army today and the fronter era Army.

    The frontier era Army often had small units scattered across large geographical areas instead of the massed formations of the Civil War. Many of the officers were never quite comfortable with that too. They would have preferred the Civil War's massed formations and large cavalry actions. Some officers today are not really comfortable with COIN, low intensity operations, etc.

    The frontier era Army was often understrength and accepted troops that were not really qualified. In that case it was often immigrants that could barely speak English. Today the Army is lowering educational standards, raising age limits, and waiving gang tattoos. But either way they often had/have a less than ideal troop.

    During the Civil War the entire country was at war, but America was not on a war footing for the Indian Wars. The Army was at war but not the nation. While there were political activists, many citizens in the east scarcely thought about it. America as a whole isn't at war today either. Not like during WWII. The military is at war, America is at the mall.
    Last edited by Rifleman; 04-01-2007 at 07:22 PM.

  6. #6
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,169

    Default Cold War Parallels

    I think the Cold War parallels are numerous, while the parallels to the Indian Wars are extremely limited, and as you stated the few that exist are mostly at the tactical level and even that is a reach. Regardless the war against radical Islam or the war on terror, is neither the cold war nor the indian wars, and drawing conclusions from loose parallels in either could lead to dangerously wrong conclusions.

  7. #7
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,188

    Default Trinkets, Sugar and Democracy

    Proffering trinkets and sugar to the Natives to bring them in closer to the forts and to sign treaties is no different than offering Democracy to a paternalistic culture wherein half the population, the women, are essentially chattel property and non-power holders in the economic and political arenas, a culture with no backdrop of representative governance and a religion that essentially forbids personal income tax. It's a tough sell, like giving Indians pocket watches and turning them into farmers. Our Westward expansion and our strategic, geopolitical maneuvering are close cousins. Hell, we still can't sort out the Imams/Medicine Men from the warriors. We're still combatting spirituality with science but what I see of the COIN mentality in this forum is encouraging. Some of these guys in the old days would be married to Indian women and eating dog and buffalo tripe from time to time. I mean, have any of our men even been in a Masjid in Iraq - you know, take off the boots, wash the face, hands, feet then sit quietly in the back? I don't know, you tell me. To a Jihadi, the God of our troops is nailed to a cross and telling you to turn the other cheek. That's part of the reason they view death in combat so differently than we do and it impacts their tactics and our anticipation of their moves as well. We've fought this fight before, many times.

  8. #8
    Moderator Steve Blair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Moore View Post
    I think the Cold War parallels are numerous, while the parallels to the Indian Wars are extremely limited, and as you stated the few that exist are mostly at the tactical level and even that is a reach. Regardless the war against radical Islam or the war on terror, is neither the cold war nor the indian wars, and drawing conclusions from loose parallels in either could lead to dangerously wrong conclusions.
    I have yet to see many good arguments for the Cold War parallels aside from some vague mutterings about clashes of ideology and the geographic scope of the conflict.

    I don't draw conclusions; rather, I look for similar mindsets that could lead to future mistakes. It has always baffled me why people seem to think that if you're looking at history you're automatically looking to draw conclusions. This isn't directed at you, Bill, but at folks in general who try to make that leap. We do not exist in a vacuum.
    "On the plains and mountains of the American West, the United States Army had once learned everything there was to learn about hit-and-run tactics and guerrilla warfare."
    T.R. Fehrenbach This Kind of War

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •