Results 1 to 20 of 564

Thread: Syria in 2017 (April-December)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    http://henryjacksonsociety.org/2017/...kurdish-areas/

    WELL worth reading


    Analysis: Crackdown Continues in Syrian Kurdish Areas

    by Kyle Orton


    The Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) controls areas of northern Syria, operating under the name of the Democratic Union Party or PYD (its political wing) and the People’s Protection Units or YPG (its military wing). On Tuesday, President Donald Trump approved plans to arm the YPG directly, abandoning a fiction that the U.S. was only arming the Arab parts of an ostensible coalition, the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), which is in fact controlled by the YPG/PKK. This is in preparation for the U.S. backing the “SDF” to liberate Raqqa City, the Syrian capital of the Islamic State’s (IS) caliphate. Leaving aside the geopolitical implications of the U.S. decision for NATO and regional order, and putting aside, too, the likelihood that this decision will defeat its own purposes and give IS a new lease on life, there is a purely humanitarian dimension that deserves more attention. In March the PYD effectively legalized its one-party state in northern Syria and escalated its already-severe persecution of the Kurdish opposition. That crackdown has continued.

    THE NATURE OF THE PYD/YPG

    The PYD/YPG is a fully integrated component of the PKK, recognised as a terrorist organisation by the European Union, NATO, and numerous individual governments, including the United States, Britain, Germany, and of course Turkey, against which the PKK has run an insurgency since 1984. The PKK was formally founded in 1978 in Turkey by Abdullah Ocalan. Ideologically, the organization mixed Marxism-Leninism and Kurdish nationalism, though the personality cult around Ocalan (“Apo”) was and is very strong. The PKK fought initially for secession and later for autonomy in the Kurdish-majority areas of Turkey.

    The PKK is a severely authoritarian organisation. It spent the years leading up to its formal foundation—and indeed the years afterward, until the Turkish coup d’état in September 1980 drove the PKK from the country—attacking other Kurds and Leftists, trying to monopolize the support from that part of the Kurdish political spectrum. This did not stop. In 1985, the PKK struck down Cetin Gungor (Semir) in Sweden after he advocated internal democratic procedures. After the PKK launched its war against the Turkish state from bases in Iraq it gained considerable popularity, which is unsurprising, given the long history of anti-Kurdish discrimination by the authorities in the Turkish republic, and the especial savagery of the post-1980 junta. Ocalan used this wave of popular assent to conduct a bloody purge of those he thought might pose a future threat to his leadership, correctly calculating that this would not get much attention when set against the fact that the long-awaited war had finally begun.

    Kurdish support for the PKK was not unanimous. Significant parts of the Kurdish population in Turkey sided with the state and formed militias in their villages to keep the PKK out, for example. The PKK also created Kurdish antagonists by insisting that it was the only legitimate representative of Kurdish opinion and its ruthless dealings with the large number of dissenters from this, who were and are labelled “traitor Kurds”. Forced conscription and “taxes” (extortion) imposed by the PKK on populations under its rule have obvious advantages in military-insurgency terms, but diminishing returns do set in.

    The PKK began setting up local organizations in the mid-2000s, primarily in Syria and Iran but also to a lesser degree in Iraq. The intention was to hide its hand, so it could better embed in populations that were suspicious of it because of its collaboration with their governments, and to avoid the international terrorism designation, especially in the War on Terror environment after 9/11. Despite claims that the group transitioned at this point from old-line Stalinism to a form of eco-anarchistic stateless democracy called “Democratic Confederalism,” in practice old habits have remained.

    BACKGROUND TO THE CRACKDOWN

    The PYD/PKK made “Decree Number Five,” built out of an ordinance issued in April 2014, operational as of 13 March 2017. It requires the registration of “unlicensed” political parties on penalty of closing their offices. The PYD has not troubled itself with elections since it gained territory via Bashar al-Assad’s withdrawal in July 2012, but has nonetheless presented itself as the sole legitimate representative of Syrian Kurds and worked to suppress opposition. It has a long record of attacking peaceful demonstrators, ransacking the offices of political groups, and jailing, exiling, and even killing journalists, activists, and others.

    The PYD has arrested dozens of opponents every year it has been controlling territory, and has taken in hundreds of de facto prisoners as conscripts. Last summer this intensified, with Ibrahim Biro, the leader of the Kurdish opposition umbrella group, the Kurdish National Council (KNC or ENKS), being expelled from Rojava, as the PYD calls the areas it controls, and told he would be killed if he returned. A dozen KNC members were abducted in the days that followed, including Hassan Saleh, who had been imprisoned multiple times for his resistance to the Assad regime. When protests against this conduct broke out, they were violently quelled and more KNC members were kidnapped the following day.

    No less than thirty oppositionists were abducted over a two-day period before the passage of Decree Number Five. Independent events pertaining to International Women’s Day were broken up, with women arrested and one doctor stabbed by PYD youth. A women’s union that publicly resisted the demand that it submit itself for approval by the PYD was burned to the ground the day after the decree came into effect. The PYD had raided, sacked, and sealed numerous opposition offices before the decree, and within five days of passing the total stood at forty-four. The repression continued through March.

    THE CURRENT WAVE OF THE CRACKDOWN

    On 23 March, Amin Omar, a teacher in Derik (Al-Malikiya), was kidnapped by the PYD. Omar’s “crime” is that he is the brother of Hussein Omar, a member of the Kurdish Union Party, usually known as the Yekiti Party, a constituent of the KNC. Hussein himself was kidnapped and detained between 9 February 2017 and 20 March. Fuad Ibrahim, a youth officer with the KNC, was arrested by the PYD on 25 March. This led to protests by Kurds aligned with the KNC in Germany, where there is a very large diaspora population (and extensive PKK networks), on 27 March, demanding that the PYD be put on the terrorism list.

    Ahmad Harran al-Motawab, a 16-year-old boy, was killed fighting for the PYD/YPG in Shadadi on 2 April. Al-Motawab had tried to flee Rojava to Turkey eighteen months ago, but was arrested at a PYD checkpoint. That was the last his family heard of him. As it now transpires, al-Motawab had become one of the YPG’s many child soldiers. On 10 April, Farhad Muhammad Othman, a shopkeeper in Dirbesiya, a town in northern Hasaka along the Turkish border, was arbitrarily detained by the PYD. The “taxation” policy also became a particular issue of contention in Kobani in April.

    The PYD moved against the headquarters of the KNC in Qamishli on 9 May, arresting thirteen people:
    1.Fasla Yusef
    2.Muhsin Taher
    3.Muhammad Amin Hussam
    4.Narin Matini
    5.Mahmud Mala
    6.Abdul Samad Khalaf Biro
    7.Fathi Kado
    8.Ahmad Aje
    9.Mahmud Haj Ali
    10.Farhad Tama
    11.Nooradeen Fatah
    12.Taher Hassaf
    13.Qasim Sharif

    The PYD has released ten of the thirteen, but continues to detain Ms. Fasla Yusef, the vice president of the KNC, Muhsin Taher, and Muhammad Amin Hussam.

    It was reported that in separate operations on 9 May, the PYD abducted another four KNC officials, two of them women, from their homes in Qamishli, and closed down the offices of the Germany-based Democracy Centre for the Human Rights.

    There is a claim from this morning that yesterday the PYD’s security forces, the Asayish, raided a village in Hasaka Province searching for Rami al-Turki, a young man who had been conscripted by the YPG before deserting. Al-Turki allegedly hid, until the PYD began threatening his family by, inter alia, firing in the air, at which point he charged them. In the ensuing melee, it is alleged that at least four civilians, including al-Turki, and three YPG militiamen were killed.

    CONCLUSION

    Most often the PYD settles for short-term arrest as a scare tactic, which can be effective, not least because time in PYD prisons so often includes torture. There are other occasions when those apprehended are either kept in custody over long periods (the PYD still holds political prisoners it abducted in 2012), expelled from the Syrian Kurdish areas, or killed. A notable case is Kawa Khaled Hussein, a member of the Kurdish opposition Azidi Party, who was tortured to death in PYD custody.

    It would be a positive development if the U.S. used its leverage to insist that the PYD cease its attacks on Kurdish opposition groups and allowed space for diversity of opinion. However, there are reasons to be sceptical that this is possible, relating to the PYD’s very nature.

    “The PYD’s terrorist practices reveal the hypocrisy of its claims regarding its democratic attitude,” the KNC said in a press release on 11 May; “they attest to the PYD’s … growing isolation from the population.” This is what the KNC is expected to say. It is also true. As The International Crisis Group recently noted, the PYD remains focused on Turkey, holding to the PKK line.

    Continued....

  2. #2
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    "Behind the smoke screen of [#PYD] egalitarian ideology, the Kurdish national project manifests"
    http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/f...as-new-capital

    "By relying on the #YPG in the fight against #ISIS, U.S. is helping one terror group fight against another."
    — U.S. amb. to Syria, 2011-14

    Amb @fordrs58 on the nature of the U.S.'s chosen partners in #Syria and the long-term disaster it's setting up.

    The Fatal Flaw in Trump's ISIS Plan
    Can he keep both the Turks and the Kurds on his side?
    https://www.theatlantic.com/internat...-raqqa/525963/

    Azor.......head's up.....
    Aleppo: #YPG released dozens of arrested Arab refugees in #Manbij and gave them 1-week ultimatum to leave #YPG-controlled areas.


    AND that is not ethnic cleansing?????

    Manbij is and was Arab....
    Last edited by OUTLAW 09; 05-15-2017 at 04:56 PM.

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    PYD spokesperson wrote for @NYTimes of group's democratic character, just after it abducted 13 Kurdish dissidents.
    https://kyleorton1991.wordpress.com/...y-terror-laws/

    Media, Democracy, and Terrorism Laws

    By Kyle Orton (@KyleWOrton) on 13 May 2017

    The New York Times on 11 May carried an op-ed entitled, “Once We Beat ISIS, Don’t Abandon Us,” by Sinam Mohamad, the effective foreign minister of the governance structure in northern Syria administered by the Democratic Union Party (PYD) and its armed wing, the People’s Protection Units (YPG), the Syrian departments of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK). This comes just over two weeks after another senior PYD/PKK official, Ilham Ahmed, was given space to disseminate the group’s messaging in The Washington Post, and the problems remain the same.

    Ms. Mohamad—like Ms. Ahmed—was not identified by her party affiliation, and was instead identified as the “foreign envoy for the Democratic Federal System of Northern Syria”. This slight deception conceals the larger issue of the PYD’s nature, a totally integrated component of the PKK’s transnational edifice. Ms. Mohamad claims that the PYD/YPG and their front-groups, the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) and Syrian Democratic Council (SDC), “are not the P.K.K.” This is to be expected since the PKK is a registered terrorist organization by NATO, the E.U., Britain, Germany, the United States, and others.

    The PYD is backed in this contention of a distinction between the YPG/SDF and the PKK by the United States government, which—as best it can—retains this fiction in order to circumvent its own terrorism laws and work with the SDF against IS. The Western press has also adhered to this, presenting this matter, when it is mentioned at all, as a contest between “Turkey’s view” of the YPG as an extension of the PKK and the YPG/SDF’s denial of that—a faux neutral posture of even-handedness, rather than objectivity. The objective stance might raise uncomfortable questions about how media organizations should deal with blacklisted groups.

    Ms. Mohamad uses the platform to attack the Turkish government. Brusquely
    dismissing Ankara’s fears that Rojava, as the PYD calls the area it controls, would become a launchpad for the PKK’s insurgency inside Turkey, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is said to be “no friend to the Kurds in Syria or in his own country” and to want to “decimate Rojava simply because his regime cannot tolerate a pluralistic democracy that includes the Kurds right next door”.

    The history of harsh discrimination against Kurds by the Turkish republic is well enough known. It has improved from the days of the Kemalist junta in the 1980s and 1990s, but there is still a long way to go. Turkey’s government has made headway in terms of human rights generally since the coup of 1980, but, again, the recent authoritarian backsliding is plain for all to see. This does not negate the fears the Turkish government has about a PYD-run enclave, which as mentioned above are well-founded, and would be shared by any government in Turkey of any ideological character. Indeed, it is quite likely that Turkey would have moved against the PYD long before now if the General Staff were still running things.

    It is the matter of democracy on which Ms. Mohamad chooses to place her emphasis, and it is here that the most glaring deficiencies with the op-ed become evident. There are references to the “unique democratic system” being built by the PYD and their “interest [in] promoting a federated system of local democracy in Syria”.

    The key paragraph is:

    Not only is our aim to fight against the Islamic State—and not Turkey—but we are also fighting for democracy, for a just and inclusive society in which Arabs, Kurds, Syriacs, Turkmen and other ethnic groups in our diverse area of Syria govern together, where women and men have an equal voice, protected by law. In city after city that we have liberated, whether majority Kurdish or not, we have given residents the opportunity to form their own democratic local governments. [Emphasis original.]

    This is textbook from the PYD, framing its state-building project in Syria in universalist, liberal terms as a means of defeating the Islamic State (IS). Parts of this are even true. The PYD has proven—with the provision of weapons, intelligence, logistics, and massive air power—an efficient partner for the international Coalition against IS. The PYD is also the only organization situated to begin an operation to evict IS from its capital, Raqqa City, if the priority is to begin that operation now and the assumption is that IS’s defeat can be measured in the square-miles it controls. But this is only part of the story.

    In terms of sustainably defeating IS, the U.S. has at least paid lip-service to the idea that liberated populations must be governed by institutions they see as legitimate. Many Arab populations, Raqqa included, are hostile to the PYD’s political program. This led the U.S. to the idea of using the PYD/YPG to liberate Arab-majority cities and then letting locals to govern themselves, which Ms. Mohamad says has been the PYD practice. This was tried in Minbij. It quickly went wrong, with locals chafing under the Minbij Military Council, a poorly-disguised PKK proxy. (This helped damage U.S.-Turkey relations, since the Turks had supported the PYD/PKK-led Minbij operation, on condition that these forces left the city after liberation.) And that was long before the PYD began handing areas of Minbij over to the coalition of forces supporting Bashar al-Assad, which we can assume will not have democratization as a priority. The U.S. had imagined that Minbij could be the model for Raqqa—and of course it probably will be.

    Meanwhile, this stress on ethnic diversity from the PYD is a useful mask for its political monopoly. The PYD has not generated a unique governance model: it inherited institutions almost wholesale from the Assad regime, which continues to operate alongside the PYD and to maintain key parts of the PYD statelet’s infrastructure. This is part of the reason some Kurds compare the PYD to the Ba’ath Party. The other reason is its intolerance of dissent. As Ms. Mohamad’s op-ed went into print, the PYD had just arrested thirteen more Kurdish political opponents, kidnapped four others from their homes, and shut the offices of an NGO. Hundreds of Kurdish dissidents have been arrested, tortured, or beaten up by PYD-directed mobs since 2012-13, with many more expelled and dozens murdered by live-fire against peaceful protesters, extra-judicial assassinations, and maltreatment in prisons. The persecution of the Kurdish opposition in PYD-held areas has escalated since March when the PYD legalized its one-party system. This is not quite the image that the PYD presents to Western audiences.

    The PYD’s suppression of dissent matters when calibrating how deeply the West should get involved with the party. The engagement began militarily, against IS. The PYD’s conciliatory relations with the regime made it into the primary U.S. anti-IS partner, since it allowed—so it appeared—U.S. engagement solely on a counter-terrorism basis. The problem, even in narrow anti-IS terms, is that the Arab opposition, not the PYD, are the force demographically capable of holding the territory IS is cleared from, and they would insist on continuing the anti-Assad fight. Regardless, the tactical decision to support the PYD is defensible to keep IS out of the Kurdish-majority areas. There is no geopolitical rationale to get more deeply politically entangled with the PYD, however: it damages the NATO alliance at a time when Russia is on the march, and it degrades a bilateral relationship with an incredibly strategically-positioned ally for the sake of a militia, landlocked in a corner of Syria, whose only non-hostile relations are with the pro-Assad coalition. If the PYD truly embodied the West’s values, it might make a case for risking relations on their behalf, but this is not so.

    It is fair for the PYD to insist they are owed a debt for their collaboration with the Coalition against IS, and some kind of autonomy would seem to be a reasonable price. Decentralization is in Syria’s future anyway, and Kurdish self-government is a just cause. But supporting the party itself, rather than independent institutions in the Syrian Kurdish areas, cements in place a PYD autocracy that has limited local buy-in, setting up a long-term crisis when such a brittle system buckles, as such systems always do.
    Last edited by OUTLAW 09; 05-15-2017 at 04:29 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 201
    Last Post: 07-14-2019, 07:42 PM
  2. Russo-Ukraine War 2017-2018
    By davidbfpo in forum Europe
    Replies: 263
    Last Post: 12-28-2018, 07:27 PM
  3. Hizbullah / Hezbollah (just the group)
    By SWJED in forum Middle East
    Replies: 176
    Last Post: 12-19-2017, 12:58 PM
  4. Syria in 2017 (January-April)
    By davidbfpo in forum Middle East
    Replies: 2112
    Last Post: 04-30-2017, 07:35 PM
  5. Syria in 2016 (January-March)
    By davidbfpo in forum Middle East
    Replies: 3135
    Last Post: 03-31-2016, 08:51 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •