Results 1 to 20 of 564

Thread: Syria in 2017 (April-December)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Report: YPG prevented Arabs displaced from Raqqa and Deir Ezzor entering Minbij and Hasaka, they went to Jarabulus
    https://www.nso-sy.com/Details/424/D...to-Jarablus/en

  2. #2
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Late last year, Brett McGurk met with Ferhat Abdi Sahin (Sahin Cilo), #PKK leader on #Turkey's most-wanted list.
    http://sabahdai.ly/q2LNog
    Attached Images Attached Images

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    How Did the US End up at the Gates of Raqqa?
    http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs...EN5Oo.twitter#

  4. #4
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    As if it weren't obvious that Syria was always deemed an inconvenient afterthought on the big idea:
    http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/05/19/...weapons-plan/#
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by OUTLAW 09; 05-19-2017 at 05:40 PM.

  5. #5
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    BREAKING | News says #Regime take Al-Zarqaa Checkpoint (55 km to Syrian-Iraqi Border) near #AlTanaf in the Desert.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  6. #6
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Senior#Hezbollah#official#Hashem Safieddine designated terrorist jointly by US and KSA

  7. #7
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Mattis blamed #Iran for propping up Assad when Syrians rose against him “They’ve extended a war that should have ended long ago

    SecDef said pro-Syrian govt forces that moved into deconfliction zone near al-Tanf are believed to be "Iranian-directed" #Syria

    Hezbollah announce the deaths of 4 fighters possibly killed in US strikes yesterday south Syria - via @Sy_Reporter
    Last edited by OUTLAW 09; 05-19-2017 at 06:22 PM.

  8. #8
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    849

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OUTLAW 09 View Post
    Late last year, Brett McGurk met with Ferhat Abdi Sahin (Sahin Cilo), #PKK leader on #Turkey's most-wanted list.
    http://sabahdai.ly/q2LNog
    McGurk was an official of the previous administration...

  9. #9
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    849

    Default RE: Trump and the Syrian Civil War

    Firstly, the fears that Trump would cut off support for the FSA (the CIA’s Operation Timber Sycamore) and give Russia a freer hand in Syria have not materialized. Russian intervention has continued at the same level as during the Obama Administration, and certainly Trump is much more willing to confront Iran and its auxiliaries than his predecessor. Even were the CIA to withdraw support for the FSA, the lack of involvement and oversight may then permit unfettered support from Turkey, Jordan and Saudi Arabia.

    Secondly, Trump has attacked Assad for using Sarin and this week attacked a pro-Assad convoy to protect a FSA unit. No such U.S. activity against pro-Assad forces occurred from 2011 through 2016. Thus far, Trump’s election is a net benefit to the FSA when compared to Obama’s tenure. It is no doubt less than ideal for the FSA, but it is a major improvement.

    Thirdly, Trump inherited U.S. cooperation with the PKK from his predecessor. As Aaron Stein at the Atlantic Council recently noted:

    This [Turkish] plan was never feasible. The Turkish feeder program has not generated enough forces to take Raqqa, while Ankara’s proposed contribution was viewed with skepticism inside the coalition.

    In reality, the Trump administration had the option to siege and take Raqqa with more U.S. conventional forces, or to undertake a much broader effort to train and equip a rival force from Syrian Arabs. Either of these two options could have helped to address Turkish concerns.

    However, it would have slowed the campaign against the Islamic State and would have gone against the advice of the commanders on the ground. The slowing of the campaign would also contradict Trump’s own campaign pledge to speed up the war against ISIS. Therefore, the outcome was all but predetermined, with the SDF serving as the only capable ground force currently ready to fight ISIL in an urban environment. All that was needed was to grant the authorities to arm the YPG.
    Overall, we are witnessing the same policies with some positive incremental changes. I say incremental because I did not find the punitive strike in response to the Sarin attack to be a major deviation. Had Assad used Sarin in 2016 or with a Clinton Administration, he would have probably been punished in a similar fashion.

    There will never be a "war to end all wars". Using the PKK as a tool to defeat Daesh as a conventional force will not end the Sunni Arab insurgency, and will likely inflame Kurdish conflicts with Turkey, Iran and Syria. Whether Syria continues to be under minority Alawi rule or whether it comes under majority Sunni Arab rule, the Syrian government and the breakaway region of Rojava will come to blows. Whereas no-fly, no-drive and Turkish approval created a de facto independent Kurdish statelet in northern Iraq, a repetition will not be possible in northern Syria.

  10. #10
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Azor View Post
    Firstly, the fears that Trump would cut off support for the FSA (the CIA’s Operation Timber Sycamore) and give Russia a freer hand in Syria have not materialized. Russian intervention has continued at the same level as during the Obama Administration, and certainly Trump is much more willing to confront Iran and its auxiliaries than his predecessor. Even were the CIA to withdraw support for the FSA, the lack of involvement and oversight may then permit unfettered support from Turkey, Jordan and Saudi Arabia.

    Secondly, Trump has attacked Assad for using Sarin and this week attacked a pro-Assad convoy to protect a FSA unit. No such U.S. activity against pro-Assad forces occurred from 2011 through 2016. Thus far, Trump’s election is a net benefit to the FSA when compared to Obama’s tenure. It is no doubt less than ideal for the FSA, but it is a major improvement.

    Thirdly, Trump inherited U.S. cooperation with the PKK from his predecessor. As Aaron Stein at the Atlantic Council recently noted:



    Overall, we are witnessing the same policies with some positive incremental changes. I say incremental because I did not find the punitive strike in response to the Sarin attack to be a major deviation. Had Assad used Sarin in 2016 or with a Clinton Administration, he would have probably been punished in a similar fashion.

    There will never be a "war to end all wars". Using the PKK as a tool to defeat Daesh as a conventional force will not end the Sunni Arab insurgency, and will likely inflame Kurdish conflicts with Turkey, Iran and Syria. Whether Syria continues to be under minority Alawi rule or whether it comes under majority Sunni Arab rule, the Syrian government and the breakaway region of Rojava will come to blows. Whereas no-fly, no-drive and Turkish approval created a de facto independent Kurdish statelet in northern Iraq, a repetition will not be possible in northern Syria.
    Azor you still do not get it....

    1. US air strike was not to protect FSA but to protect SF units the 5th and UK SAS...

    2. Verified by FSA themselves with their comments that they had been ordered to move out of the crossing point....still not confirmed though

    3. That TLAM was for nothing but show and that was it...had no impact on any of the ME players did not impress Iran nor did this air strike impress them

    Both TLAM and air strikes served to provide Russia and Iran just more propaganda....

    4. Trump could have broken with Obama but did not as he has absolutely no plan on how to defeat IS.

    REMEMBER it was Trump himself that stated he would have within 60 days a "plan to defeat IS"..we are way pass 100 days and have you seen this "plan"....MIA......

    5. By fully titling to the PKK Trump has ensured a decade of more fighting between Turkey and PKK

    So all on all..what I have constantly bashed Obama for on his failed strategy because anything the FSA did that placed his Iran Deal in trouble he deflected back onto the Syrians...NOW we can continue to bash Trump FOR CONTINUING what basically was a pro Iranian strategy.....

    That should have been apparent from the two postings here from former Obama types....BUT you seemed to miss those postings..

    The Iran Deal was everything...and the Syrians were collateral damage...

  11. #11
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Azor...remember that Steel Dossier that you bashed me about....and now is it in fact impacting anything the US is doing as a FP????

    The New York Times‏
    Verifizierter Account
    #
    @nytimes

    What President Trump told Russian officials about firing James Comey
    http://nyti.ms/2pTMns7#

    "I just fired the head of the FBI. He was crazy, a real nut job. I faced great pressure because of Russia. That's taken off."

    President Trump 10 May 2017 Oval Office

    Russian collusion...criminal investigation and now WH coverup.....

    The Washington Post reported Friday afternoon that federal investigators were looking at a senior White House official as a “significant person of interest.” The article did not identify the official, though it noted that the person was “someone close to the president.”
    A person of interest is someone law enforcement identifies as relevant to an investigation but who has not been charged or arrested.
    And The New York Times reported that Trump had told visiting Russian officials in the Oval Office that firing Comey had taken pressure off the Russia probe.


    The Independent‏
    Verifizierter Account
    #
    @Independent
    Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner 'person of interest in Russia investigation'
    http://ind.pn/2qGulqu
    Last edited by OUTLAW 09; 05-20-2017 at 06:37 AM.

  12. #12
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    849

    Default To Outlaw 09 RE: Syria

    Quote Originally Posted by OUTLAW 09 View Post
    Azor you still do not get it....

    1. US air strike was not to protect FSA but to protect SF units the 5th and UK SAS...

    2. Verified by FSA themselves with their comments that they had been ordered to move out of the crossing point....still not confirmed though

    3. That TLAM was for nothing but show and that was it...had no impact on any of the ME players did not impress Iran nor did this air strike impress them

    Both TLAM and air strikes served to provide Russia and Iran just more propaganda....

    4. Trump could have broken with Obama but did not as he has absolutely no plan on how to defeat IS.

    REMEMBER it was Trump himself that stated he would have within 60 days a "plan to defeat IS"..we are way pass 100 days and have you seen this "plan"....MIA......

    5. By fully titling to the PKK Trump has ensured a decade of more fighting between Turkey and PKK

    So all on all..what I have constantly bashed Obama for on his failed strategy because anything the FSA did that placed his Iran Deal in trouble he deflected back onto the Syrians...NOW we can continue to bash Trump FOR CONTINUING what basically was a pro Iranian strategy.....

    That should have been apparent from the two postings here from former Obama types....BUT you seemed to miss those postings..

    The Iran Deal was everything...and the Syrians were collateral damage...
    RE:

    1-2. Regardless, Obama was loath to use force against Assad even to protect U.S. personnel, for fear of the optics. The fact that the U.S. is now unconcerned with the optics of appearing to provide CAS for the rebels (or “terrorists” according to Damascus and Moscow) indicates a major change of policy.

    3. Thus far, there have been no reports of any chemical weapons use by Assad since the airstrike on Shayrat Airbase, let alone of Sarin.

    4. Trump was never going to radically break from Obama’s handling of Daesh. The fact is that Obama’s approach was the most cost-effective, and fit with his overall CT strategy of containment and attrition. Any radical departure would either be prohibitively expensive in blood, treasure and political capital, or would allow for a resurgence of Daesh. Neither Trump nor the Republicans are especially fond of the JCPOA. Whereas Obama was prepared to give Iran a free hand in Iraq, Syria and Lebanon, and to tolerate Iranian provocations such as the capture and parading of U.S. soldiers, Trump does not appear to have those inclinations. Any approach that does not involve direct conflict with Iran can be regarded as “pro-Iranian”, given that country’s aggression.

    Syrians were not “collateral damage” for the JCPOA. The fact is that humanitarian grounds aside, the U.S. had no compelling interest to intervene in Syria. Rather than the JCPOA, I would suggest that probably there was a gentleman’s agreement between Washington, Moscow and Damascus, that Obama would not intervene in Syria as long as Assad surrendered his chemical weapons. It was difficult to punish Assad in 2013, when Washington wanted him to both refrain from using chemical weapons and to keep those weapons secure.

    5. The tilt to the PKK was done by the previous administration. For the reasons that Aaron Stein provided above, it is a sound policy if the objective is solely the defeat of Daesh as a statelet and conventional force, and as quickly as possible. As for any unfinished business or loose ends, these were also present in 1865, 1918, 1945, 1953 and 1991, to say nothing of later marches to folly. Arguably, the Vietnam War's end has produced the least fallout of any major American war, despite the loss.

  13. #13
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Azor View Post
    RE:

    1-2. Regardless, Obama was loath to use force against Assad even to protect U.S. personnel, for fear of the optics. The fact that the U.S. is now unconcerned with the optics of appearing to provide CAS for the rebels (or “terrorists” according to Damascus and Moscow) indicates a major change of policy.

    3. Thus far, there have been no reports of any chemical weapons use by Assad since the airstrike on Shayrat Airbase, let alone of Sarin.

    4. Trump was never going to radically break from Obama’s handling of Daesh. The fact is that Obama’s approach was the most cost-effective, and fit with his overall CT strategy of containment and attrition. Any radical departure would either be prohibitively expensive in blood, treasure and political capital, or would allow for a resurgence of Daesh. Neither Trump nor the Republicans are especially fond of the JCPOA. Whereas Obama was prepared to give Iran a free hand in Iraq, Syria and Lebanon, and to tolerate Iranian provocations such as the capture and parading of U.S. soldiers, Trump does not appear to have those inclinations. Any approach that does not involve direct conflict with Iran can be regarded as “pro-Iranian”, given that country’s aggression.

    Syrians were not “collateral damage” for the JCPOA. The fact is that humanitarian grounds aside, the U.S. had no compelling interest to intervene in Syria. Rather than the JCPOA, I would suggest that probably there was a gentleman’s agreement between Washington, Moscow and Damascus, that Obama would not intervene in Syria as long as Assad surrendered his chemical weapons. It was difficult to punish Assad in 2013, when Washington wanted him to both refrain from using chemical weapons and to keep those weapons secure.

    5. The tilt to the PKK was done by the previous administration. For the reasons that Aaron Stein provided above, it is a sound policy if the objective is solely the defeat of Daesh as a statelet and conventional force, and as quickly as possible. As for any unfinished business or loose ends, these were also present in 1865, 1918, 1945, 1953 and 1991, to say nothing of later marches to folly. Arguably, the Vietnam War's end has produced the least fallout of any major American war, despite the loss.
    FSA Unified Military Council for Deir EzZor coordinating w/ supporting countries prepare for big battle #DeirEzZor:
    http://eldorar.com/node/111650

    Turkish ambo to US, Serdar Kılıç, rips US policy in Syria for backing YPG for battle of Raqqa. No way to treat a 65-year ally, he said
    Last edited by OUTLAW 09; 05-22-2017 at 06:33 PM.

  14. #14
    Council Member CrowBat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Haxbach, Schnurliland
    Posts
    1,563

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Azor View Post
    REThe fact that the U.S. is now unconcerned with the optics of appearing to provide CAS for the rebels (or “terrorists” according to Damascus and Moscow)...
    It's very simple, actually: the 'terrorists' in question are forbidden from fighting Damascus and Moscow. They are fighting Daesh all the time.

    Now, feel free to make up your mind...

    The fact is that Obama’s approach was the most cost-effective...
    16 Years since 9/11, 16 years of war in Afghanistan, 16 years of war in Yemen, 14 years of war in Iraq, ... and there are still characters calling that 'cost-effective'...

    Arguably, the Vietnam War's end has produced the least fallout of any major American war, despite the loss.
    ...oh, but sure: because people like you are insistent on ignoring Vietnamese and Cambodian opinions about this 'least fallout'...

  15. #15
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Azor View Post
    McGurk was an official of the previous administration...
    So...??

    Just confirms how badly the US has messed up for over 8 years....and somehow overlooked that the PKK was a Communist terrorist group since 1978...

  16. #16
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    King Salman met Donald Trump on the tarmac. He didn't do the same for Obama last year.
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/preside...ts-1495263979#

    BTW...that 110B USDs arms deal could be viewed as "buying US actions against Iran" could it not????

  17. #17
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Russia delivering oil/gas industry equipment to Syria:

  18. #18
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Azor...so there was no "blowback" on the Trump massive security failure????

    REPORT: Israeli intelligence officials were shouting at U.S. counterparts in meetings over Trump's SNAFU
    http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/05/19/...a-iran-syria/#

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 201
    Last Post: 07-14-2019, 07:42 PM
  2. Russo-Ukraine War 2017-2018
    By davidbfpo in forum Europe
    Replies: 263
    Last Post: 12-28-2018, 07:27 PM
  3. Hizbullah / Hezbollah (just the group)
    By SWJED in forum Middle East
    Replies: 176
    Last Post: 12-19-2017, 12:58 PM
  4. Syria in 2017 (January-April)
    By davidbfpo in forum Middle East
    Replies: 2112
    Last Post: 04-30-2017, 07:35 PM
  5. Syria in 2016 (January-March)
    By davidbfpo in forum Middle East
    Replies: 3135
    Last Post: 03-31-2016, 08:51 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •