The "60%" stat is over the top. Even if we just look at the ratio of soldiers in tactical units vs strategic & TRADOC, it is far below 60%. Every tactical unit in the active force is plugged into the OIF/OEF deployment rotation at some point.
There are also far fewer places to hide then there used to be. Pre-OIF I used to know of NCOs who would bounce from one TRADOC assignment to another, perhaps throw in a Strat tour, and often end up at a cake assignment at "echeclons above reality"; thus avoiding ever having to serve in any type of tactical unit for their entire NCO career - fitting the parasitical description you provide of "no danger of deployment or even convenience". However, with a few exceptions, that situation has come to a halt.
Cadre at TRADOC units these days get hit hard with individual taskings for OIF/OEF - this often leaves the student to uniformed cadre ratio at levels which is very difficult to manage. There is much (too much, in my opinion) AIT instruction that has been turned over to contractors now, because NCOs can not be spared from operational units. Significant pressure has been brought to bear upon branch managers to more tightly control assignments, and the parasitical behavior has been reduced, although not eliminated.
Again, although there are those who have been sitting out OIF/OEF, a portion of them by willfully manipulating the assignment system or through other consciously selected deployment-avoidance mechanisms, 60% is a gross exaggeration.
Bookmarks