Results 1 to 20 of 434

Thread: Georgia's South Ossetia Conflict - Political Commentary

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,007

    Default

    MOSCOW MOVES TO DE FACTO ANNEXATION OF GEORGIAN BREAKAWAY REGIONS

    By Svante E. Cornell and David J. Smith (04/16/2008 issue of the CACI Analyst)

    Moscow’s promised response to the Kosovo settlement in the Caucasus appears to be materializing. For several weeks, Russian leaders from President Vladimir Putin down have taken new bold steps that encroach even further and more directly on Georgia’s territorial integrity than is already the case. On April 16, Russia’s outgoing president Vladimir Putin signed a decree moving toward the de facto annexation of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, removing the tiny fig leaf still present regarding Moscow’s ambitions of direct control over Georgia’s breakaway regions. These moves could to trigger a spiral of instability in the wider region, unless a forceful western response is found.
    http://www.isn.ethz.ch/pubs/ph/detai...10622&id=54679

    Marietta König
    The Georgian-South Ossetian Conflict
    http://www.core-hamburg.de/documents...04/K%F6nig.pdf




    TBILISI WITHDRAWS FROM THE JOINT CONTROL COMMISSION; PROPOSES NEW FORMAT FOR SOUTH OSSETIA
    By Niklas Nilsson (03/19/2008 issue of the CACI Analyst)

    Russia has in the aftermath of Kosovo's declaration of independence further reinforced its support for South Ossetia, as well as Abkhazia, stressing the importance of Kosovo as a precedent for other ethnic conflicts. On March 6, Russia withdrew from the 1996 CIS treaty imposing economic sanctions on Abkhazia and has subsequently held discussions in the State Duma on the prospects for recognizing the independence of the two regions. Russia's envoy to NATO, Dmitry Rogozin, has also sought to connect these decisions to the outcomes of the Bucharest NATO summit in April, where a verdict will likely be cast on Georgia's prospects for obtaining a Membership Action Plan within NATO. Several NATO members oppose a MAP for Georgia due to the implications Georgia's unresolved conflicts and its troubled relations with Russia may have for the alliance.
    http://www.cacianalyst.org/?q=node/4816
    Last edited by kaur; 08-09-2008 at 06:58 PM.

  2. #2
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Leavenworth, KS
    Posts
    27

    Default

    According to news reports the Russians have committed 500 armored vehicles, 150 tanks, deployed the Black Sea fleet and is planning a 100 plane airborne insertion.

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Newport News, VA
    Posts
    150

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darksaga View Post
    According to news reports the Russians have committed 500 armored vehicles, 150 tanks, deployed the Black Sea fleet and is planning a 100 plane airborne insertion.
    In other words, it seems likely the Russians are going to attempt to conquer the whole of Georgia, and either re-absorb it or install a puppet government.
    He cloaked himself in a veil of impenetrable terminology.

  4. #4
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    The price would be too high and a Russia-friendly puppet government would not last long after a rise of nationalistic feelings as it always happens during an invasion.

    The Georgian government will fall most likely anyway because of this apparent disaster. That's what Putin hopes for imho.

  5. #5
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    66

    Default

    The danger here is that someoen has miscalculated.

    Putin calculates that the West can't and won't intervene militarily.

    We are calculating that Russia will pull back.

    What if all of us are wrong????

  6. #6
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default Armageddon in the Caucasus?

    No cut to the defense budget? We'll just have to wait and see. BTW, I'm not calculating that Russia will pull back or that the 'west' won't intervene. Everytime I think someone has done the dumbest thing in the world, someone comes along and tops it...

    Don't you hate it when people don't play right? National interests can be such a drag.

  7. #7
    Council Member Stan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    3,817

    Default

    Hey Carl !
    Sorry, I think your email to me got zapped by our server.

    Quote Originally Posted by carl View Post
    I think much depends upon the proficiency of the Russian armed forces as of this moment. If they are as inept as they were when they first went into Chechnya, things could get very complicated for Vlad.
    I agree with you and would add that although mathematically Russia outnumbers Georgia in both manpower and equipment, Georgia has been receiving training and equipment from NATO for the last 10 years. And, nobody better than Russia can related to fighting a small unit mired in the mountains.

    The Russian press is content to report that Georgia's military capabilities and training have changed little, while Baltic/NATO studies and this Deutsche Welle article would indicate otherwise.

    Today, roughly one-quarter of Georgia's functional land forces are US-trained. The backbone of the Georgian army is seven infantry battalions raised from scratch and brought by the US Green Berets from boot camp to something quite close to NATO-standard combat readiness over the years, a mass of some 5,000 men.
    This Telegraph article sums up Russia's Peacekeeping proficiency nicely:

    The Russians lack of enough force to deploy decisively from the outset has forced them to over-rely on artillery...

    The problem the Russians face in South Ossetia is that their peacekeepers have had to make the transition overnight to what is, in effect, a war-fighting force.
    Regards, Stan
    Last edited by Stan; 08-10-2008 at 06:52 AM. Reason: missing link to text
    If you want to blend in, take the bus

  8. #8
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,007

    Default

    Georgian troops have pulled back to positions at or south of those held on 6 August, when the current hostilities began, said Georgian Interior Ministry spokesman Shota Utiashvili.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7552012.stm

    If someone is interested in Soviet military maps of Georgian territory you can find those there.

    http://www.topomaps.ru/caucasus/georgia.shtml

  9. #9
    Council Member reed11b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Olympia WA
    Posts
    531

    Default Too those who know..

    It appears by following the mainstream press, that Georgia intiated the conflict with a heavy bombardment of a civilian city and the Russians responded. It is hard to be sympathetic to the Georgians based on this, but there seems to be some sympathy for them within the community. What am I missing?
    Reed

  10. #10
    Council Member 120mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Wonderland
    Posts
    1,284

    Default

    Note to self: There are still American training advisors trapped in Georgia. I talked to a friend, yesterday, and he says they are receiving sporadic artillery at the training base where they're living.

    No casualties for us, yet....

  11. #11
    Council Member Wildcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Inside your OODA loop
    Posts
    72

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stevely View Post
    In other words, it seems likely the Russians are going to attempt to conquer the whole of Georgia, and either re-absorb it or install a puppet government.
    If that happens, say hello to the world's newest small war. The Georgians are well equipped and well trained (by us, coincidentally... anyone else happen to notice that they wear woodland MARPAT uniforms?). They won't just sit back and let themselves be absorbed by the Russians. They'll retaliate, and the Chechans may get involved as well. This will get very bloody, and I don't expect it to last just a few days. This could go on for months.

  12. #12
    Council Member bourbon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    903

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stevely View Post
    In other words, it seems likely the Russians are going to attempt to conquer the whole of Georgia, and either re-absorb it or install a puppet government.
    Maybe, or just keep the conflict hot enough to put the kibosh on Georgia (and the other candidate Ukraine) being voted into NATO membership come December.

  13. #13
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darksaga
    According to news reports the Russians have committed 500 armored vehicles, 150 tanks, deployed the Black Sea fleet and is planning a 100 plane airborne insertion.
    In future posts, when making comments of this nature, provide a source. If you cannot provide a direct link, at a minimum clearly state the source of your information.

Similar Threads

  1. North Korea: catch all thread
    By SWJED in forum Asia-Pacific
    Replies: 408
    Last Post: 04-24-2015, 03:17 PM
  2. Replies: 141
    Last Post: 08-30-2012, 09:23 AM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-14-2010, 02:38 PM
  4. Conflict Analysis
    By Jedburgh in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-24-2007, 04:10 PM
  5. Vietnam's Forgotten Lessons
    By SWJED in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 04-26-2006, 11:50 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •