Bill Lind gives the 3 USA options for Syria and Egypt in the Middle East.
https://www.traditionalright.com/the...-change-sides/
Bill Lind gives the 3 USA options for Syria and Egypt in the Middle East.
https://www.traditionalright.com/the...-change-sides/
From a pragmatic point of view I would have to agree with Lind - up to the point of chemical weapons. We have made the mistake of backing the guy using the chemical weapons in the past and it made us look hypocritical later.
We have backed the least best option in the past. The history of our foreign affairs during the Cold War was replet with th U.S. backing capitalist dictators against popularly supported representative communism. We are often willing to compromise our democratic principals for the "greater good".
Here we are presented with a similar choice - support a secular dictator instead of a popular Islamic state. The choice should be clear. Perhaps we are changing the way we think or perhaps we don't see a religion that is practiced in the U.S. as a threat in the same way we saw communism as a threat. I don't know.
"I can change almost anything ... but I can't change human nature."
Jon Osterman/Dr. Manhattan
---
Recent interview on C-SPAN of Bill Lind on Foreign Policy and Fourth Generation Warfare.
http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4501370/william-lind
Interesting article from Bill Lind on 4GW and the Child Invasion from Mexico.
http://www.traditionalright.com/
Bookmarks