Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: The Uncertain Cost of the GWOT

  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,099

    Default The Uncertain Cost of the GWOT

    CSIS, 8 Aug 07: The Uncertain Cost of the Global War on Terrorism
    ...If Congress approves the FY2008 war requests, the Congressional Research Service (CRS) estimates that total funding for Iraq and the Global War on Terror would reach about $758 billion, including about $567 billion for Iraq, $157 billion for Afghanistan, $29 billion for enhanced security, and $5 billion unallocated. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the Defense Department is currently obligating an average of almost $11 billion a month for expenses related to its operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and for other activities related to the war on terrorism. Most of that sum (more than $9 billion per month) is related to Iraq.

    The CRS found that the estimates of expenditures being issued by the U.S. government understated the real cost of operations because they included only current obligations, not the cost in terms of worn equipment, future replacements, paying the long-term costs of increased pensions and payments for killed and wounded, and paying for a long list of additional costs such as support by the national intelligence agencies.

    There is no way to do more than guess at the ultimate cost of the Iraq War, the Afghan War, and the war on terrorism. CBO projected the cost of war for the 2008-2017 period under two scenarios. The first case assumes a more rapid drawdown of the troops deployed in Iraq, Afghanistan and other places in support of GWOT operations; the cost in such a situation would range from $481 to $603 billion, depending on the duration of the surge in Iraq. Under a second scenario, assuming a more gradual drawdown, the extra cost for the next decade would be between $924 and $1,010 billion, again depending on how long the current level of troops is maintained in Iraq....
    CRS, 16 Jul 07: The Cost of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Other Global War on Terror Operations Since 9/11

  2. #2
    Council Member Anthony Hoh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Charleston Illinois
    Posts
    61

    Default NCOPD on expressing the cost of the GWOT

    The CIA world fact book estimates there are 26,074,906 people in Iraq as of 2005.

    I bet you saw this next part coming,

    Divide by $11,000,000,000.00 dollars.

    $ 421.86 cents a month, per person.
    Last edited by Anthony Hoh; 08-16-2007 at 06:47 PM. Reason: CYA

  3. #3
    Council Member Tom Odom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    DeRidder LA
    Posts
    3,949

    Default

    NCOPD on expressing the cost of the GWOT (Formerly known as: ?A little free time with my calculator… )"
    Did someone say free time?

    Back to werk...or it's to the pitt

    Perfect Tommy
    Last edited by Tom Odom; 08-16-2007 at 10:09 PM.

  4. #4
    Council Member Stan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    3,817

    Default Congressional Options to Affect Military Operations

    The math seems to work, and the numbers are extremely impressive, but there's a slight glitch from the 70's on page 32 (afterall, it is a State Document)

    As interest in alternate policies for Iraq has grown, Congress may turn to the Vietnam and other experience to look for ways to affect military operations and troop levels in Iraq. In the past, Congress has considered both funding and non-funding options. Most observers would maintain that restrictions tied to appropriations have been more effective.

    Past attempts or provisions to restrict funding have followed several patterns
    including those that:

    cut off funding for particular types of military activities but permit
    funding for other activities (e.g., prohibiting funds for combat
    activities but permitting funds to withdraw troops)

    Other non-funding approaches to restrict military operations have:

    required that troops be withdrawn by a specified date in the future or
    at the “earliest practical date;”

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •