Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: How a ‘Good War’ in Afghanistan Went Bad

  1. #21
    Council Member jonSlack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    156

    Default Reuters - Taliban offensive unlikely in east Afghanistan-US

    Reuters - Taliban offensive unlikely in east Afghanistan-US

    WASHINGTON, Jan 23 (Reuters) - A senior U.S. military commander said on Wednesday he did not expect the Taliban to mount a major offensive in eastern Afghanistan this spring, but experts warned of rising violence and a stronger insurgency.

    Army Maj. Gen. David Rodriguez, the top commander of NATO troops in eastern Afghanistan, said Afghan security forces and other civilian authorities had established a stronger presence in the east of the country.

    "I don't think there will be a big spring offensive this year," said Rodriguez, on a visit back to the United States.

    "The people of Afghanistan don't want the Taliban back and the strength of their institutions has grown significantly in the last year," he said at the Pentagon.
    "In times of change learners inherit the earth; while the learned find themselves beautifully equipped to deal with a world that no longer exists." - Eric Hoffer

  2. #22
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    717

    Default

    I read that report earlier today and I just can't get my head around what it's reporting. Maybe it's right - but it just doesn't make much sense. As one commentator on this piece remarked, if the Taleban in eastern Afghanistan aren't quite coming out to fight like they might, it's more likely because they don't have to, rather than that they can't.

    Paddy Ashdown is supposed to touch-down in Afghanistan today, and hopefully he may be able to take advantage of some fault lines and especially the recent split between the Taleban leadership and one of its senior commanders over operations in Pakistan. Or at the very least, be able to go to work on making deals with certain tribes and leaders of the Pashtuns to be able to accomplish something akin to the "Anbar Awakening" in Iraq.

    At least one of the Marine BLT's that's coming soon to Afghanistan is heading to Kandahar to join the NATO contingent there. That will go a long way to helping to shore up the resolve of at least one NATO-member Government to stay in the fight. Now if there happened to be a nice chunk of Marine Air coming along with them...

    There's going to need it if they can get it. They'll be fighting not only the local Pashtuns and of course Chechens, Uzbeks, and Arabs, but these same guys using Soviet-style conventional war TTP's right down to the kinds of trench systems and layout of field fortifications they use. Cold War-type training is actually more useful in parts of Afghanistan than some might think.

  3. #23
    Council Member franksforum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Oakton, VA
    Posts
    23

    Default Final Report of the Afghanistan Study Group

    This report is from the Center for the Study of the Presidency dated 30 January 2008. Co-chairs are Gen. James L. Jones, USMC (Ret.) and Ambassador Thomas R. Pickering. You can download the report in PDF format at the link below

    http://www.thepresidency.org/pubs/Af...roup_final.pdf

  4. #24
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,366

    Default Good read

    An interesting summary of the problems Afghanistan poses to NATO and others. Once again an American call for more co-operation, primarily from NATO and agreement to an agenda led by the USA. I just cannot see European NATO members falling into line. Not the purpose of the paper, but this reluctance, if not refusal, is not explained - a major error if this paper is to influence policy-making.

    davidbfpo

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •