Originally Posted by
ProfessorB
Speaking of the twisted logic department, what is the logical -- that is, mathematical -- basis for IF you didn't condemn Saddam, THEN you have no moral foundation for criticizing Bush? Presumably, then, since Reagan didn't condemn Pol Pot, he had no moral foundation for condemning Soviet Communism.
Are we now at the point in the discussion that a governing body for anthropologists is given sufficient political gravitas that one needs to take seriously an admonition against anthropologists serving with the military? The Association rejects the war -- that's not foolish Vietnam-era namby-pambyism, it's a political position to which they are entitled as citizens of the United States.
Bookmarks