View Poll Results: Should NATO deploy additional military forces to Afghanistan?

Voters
7. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    6 85.71%
  • No

    1 14.29%
Results 1 to 20 of 169

Thread: NATO in Afghanistan till 2015 (merged thread)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    1,602

    Default Growing violence in Kandahar 'insignificant,' Canada's top soldier says

    Growing violence in Kandahar 'insignificant,' top soldier says
    GRAEME SMITH
    Globe and Mail Update
    July 13, 2008 at 4:49 PM EDT

    KANDAHAR, AFGHANISTAN — Canada's top soldier has dismissed the growing violence in Kandahar as “insignificant,” contradicting all public data and highlighting the growing gap between Canada's upbeat view of the war and the sober analysis from other NATO countries.

    ...

    A comparison of the past two months against the same period in the previous year shows that insurgent attacks have more than doubled in the current fighting season, from 134 in 2007 to 289 in 2008.

    For the year to date, VSSA counted 532 insurgent attacks as of July 6, up 77 per cent from 300 last year.

    Canadian military officials have argued that the shifting nature of the Taliban's attacks shows that the insurgents are growing weaker, because they are increasingly relying on bombs, or improvised explosive devices, instead of confronting their enemy in direct combat.

    In fact, the statistics for Kandahar don't show a clear trend toward bombs as the weapon of choice for the insurgents. While IEDs were the most common type of attack last year, the number of successful IED strikes was slightly smaller this year than the number of so-called complex attacks – ambushes using more than one type of weapon. Such multi-layered attacks have increased this year by 116 per cent, to 123, according the VSSA numbers.

  2. #2
    Council Member RTK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Wherever my stuff is
    Posts
    824

    Default 9 Dead in Afghanistan attack

    Seems to be some disagreement in this...

    U.S. officials say militant attacks in Afghanistan are becoming more complex, intense and better coordinated than a year ago. Monthly death tolls of U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan surpassed U.S. military deaths in Iraq in May and June. And last Monday, a homicide bomber attacked the Indian Embassy in Kabul, killing 58 people in the deadliest attack in the Afghan capital since 2001.

    U.S. officials are considering drawing down additional forces from Iraq in coming months, in part because of the need for additional U.S. troops in Afghanistan. U.S. officials have said they need at least three more brigades in Afghanistan — or more than 10,000 troops.
    More at the link
    Example is better than precept.

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    1,602

    Default

    Sadly, I'm rather inclined to the latter view...

  4. #4
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    1,602

    Default

    We don't feel secure, Afghans say
    Locals perplexed. Disagree with new chief's rosy analysis
    GRAHAM THOMSON, Canwest News Service
    15 July 2008

    On Saturday Canada's top soldier said Afghans "feel more secure" and the residents of Kandahar City "have returned to the normal pattern of life" after a spectacular prison break that freed 400 Taliban sympathizers last month.

    Yesterday that's not how some local Afghans described their situation.

  5. #5
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    1,602

    Default Taliban control more of Kandahar

    Taliban control more of Kandahar: analysis
    GRAEME SMITH
    From Wednesday's Globe and Mail
    July 15, 2008 at 7:53 PM EDT

    KANDAHAR, AFGHANISTAN — More districts of Kandahar are controlled by the Taliban than by the Afghan government, according to a U.S. assessment that casts doubt on Canada's upbeat view of the war.

    A detailed analysis by U.S. security officials shows that foreign troops and their local allies hold sway over the core, highly populated districts of Kandahar, but the zone of government control remains a small part of the vast territory assigned to Canadian responsibility two years ago.

    The assessment divides Kandahar's districts into four categories: contested, Taliban controlled, locally controlled, and government controlled. Only four of 16 districts were classified as government controlled. The Taliban were described as controlling six districts.

    ...

    Many other provinces also suffer from a strong Taliban presence according to the analysis, which found insurgents controlling or contesting roughly 130 of 398 districts assessed across the country.

    Most of the districts heavily influenced by the insurgency were located in the south and east, but the study also found that the militants had gained a foothold in areas near Kabul, such as Wardak and Logar provinces.

  6. #6
    Council Member marct's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Rex, I have suspected for some time that the "assessments" being released are for the home environment. One key indicator, to me at least, was the ban on posting pictures or bloging by active CF personnelle. I am a touch surprised at the current "assessment"; at least with Hillier, we could count on a fairly accurate (if that has any meaning ) series of statements. I'm not so sanguine about the current form appearing...
    Sic Bisquitus Disintegrat...
    Marc W.D. Tyrrell, Ph.D.
    Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies,
    Senior Research Fellow,
    The Canadian Centre for Intelligence and Security Studies, NPSIA
    Carleton University
    http://marctyrrell.com/

Similar Threads

  1. Urban / City Warfare (merged thread)
    By DDilegge in forum Futurists & Theorists
    Replies: 201
    Last Post: 05-21-2020, 11:24 AM
  2. Assessing Al-Qaeda (merged thread)
    By SWJED in forum Global Issues & Threats
    Replies: 286
    Last Post: 08-04-2019, 09:54 AM
  3. The Clausewitz Collection (merged thread)
    By SWJED in forum Futurists & Theorists
    Replies: 933
    Last Post: 03-19-2018, 02:38 PM
  4. Is the NATO Surge Working in Afghanistan?
    By SWJ Blog in forum OEF - Afghanistan
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-11-2011, 01:00 PM
  5. New NATO Library Guide: Counterinsurgency in Afghanistan
    By SWJ Blog in forum OEF - Afghanistan
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-30-2010, 12:30 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •