Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Coalition Warfare at the Tactical level and the consequences of cultural disconnects

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Thumbs up Great piece, Rob.

    Having worked as an Advisor to a Viet Namese Battalion and as an ops advisor to the old Imperial Iranian Army, I agree with your conclusions and the anecdotes brought several grins to my face...

  2. #2
    Council Member marct's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Hi Rob,

    Great anecdote! Thanks for posting it. I've been thinking about your piece for a while now (since my last comments), and I think that one of the key differences lies in the warrior ethos (vs. a soldiers ethos). This isn't to say that the two can't be combined, but I suspect that the warrior ethos dominates in the Iraqi mindset. Just out of interest, after successful IA raids, did the people taking part in them talk about it in the first person - I vs We?

    Marc
    Sic Bisquitus Disintegrat...
    Marc W.D. Tyrrell, Ph.D.
    Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies,
    Senior Research Fellow,
    The Canadian Centre for Intelligence and Security Studies, NPSIA
    Carleton University
    http://marctyrrell.com/

  3. #3
    Council Member Rob Thornton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Fort Leavenworth, KS
    Posts
    1,510

    Default

    Marc,
    Its difficult because once you engage through an interpreter you get their interpretation. However, the BN S3 did speak english and he would generally say " my soldiers did this" or "the patrol, they do this".
    I think there was some "we" and there was some "I" in the interpreters' responses - this may have also been skewed by how I asked the question(s) and which interpreter I used (not all are as capable - or as familiar).
    If I had to strike a balance I would say that when referring to a "we" it was more along the lines of the patrol vs. a company or BN - this reflects how they operate - and maybe why I reflected that in the org chart I did up on "building Indig Sec Forces" in VOL 8 - I just did not fully realize why I did it until now - interesting.
    Best, Rob

  4. #4
    Council Member marct's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Hi Rob,

    Thanks. The I - We split tends to indicate a whole slew of different things, which is why I was wondering how they described the actions.

    Marc
    Sic Bisquitus Disintegrat...
    Marc W.D. Tyrrell, Ph.D.
    Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies,
    Senior Research Fellow,
    The Canadian Centre for Intelligence and Security Studies, NPSIA
    Carleton University
    http://marctyrrell.com/

  5. #5
    Council Member Armchairguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    42

    Default News story on CNN

    This has nothing to do with your great anecdotes Rob, but it seemed that this was a story that you'd love. An Iraqi officer and his troops gave a check for $1000 to help out Americans hurt by the California wildfires. Choked me up a bit.

  6. #6
    Council Member Rob Thornton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Fort Leavenworth, KS
    Posts
    1,510

    Default

    ACG - Thanks - I'll see if I can dig the story up - I appreciate you bringing it up. Best, Rob

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •