Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Confronting Iran: Securing Iraq's Border

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member Ron Humphrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    1,099

    Default Why Not

    Quote Originally Posted by Penta View Post
    Reading through this, I'm shaking my head.

    Incredibly dumb idea: US troops...Getting involved in the drug trade...As part of their mission. Gee, that can't possibly go disastrously wrong, can it? </sarcasm>
    Considering that I don't suppose working cooperatively with Iranian Customs would achieve much , the Generals propositions sound like a pretty good tactic to me.

  2. #2
    Registered User S2MSSI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    www.irregularwarfare.org
    Posts
    6

    Default

    To avoid some additional focus/scrutiny on the specific recommendations (although that would be fine), our intent in the concept creation was not just to focus specifically on any one particular solution. There are a host of additional actions that we left out for specific reasons and a number that would have to go together with other participants. We weighed a number of the concepts and thought these could be very plausible and effective when combined together, however, the main thrust was to also represent some UW constructs and applicability to other AOs. It was also our opinion from a starting point that some leadership have forgotten many of the great options that SOF can provide to today's threats. Unfortunately, they take time and patience to do it right.

    Earlier in the year was a piece that was developed to re-address some IW shortcomings in today's military. The Iran piece leveraged many of those concepts that can be and should be in our box of tools, driven by today's leaders for tomorrow.

    Scott

    Link for reference: http://www.mccormicktribune.org/publ...larwarfare.pdf
    Last edited by S2MSSI; 11-20-2007 at 03:25 AM.

  3. #3
    Council Member Stan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    3,817

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by S2MSSI View Post
    To avoid some additional focus/scrutiny on the specific recommendations (although that would be fine), our intent in the concept creation was not focused specifically on any one particular solution. There are a host that we left out for specific reasons and a number that would have to go together with other participants. We weighed a number of the concepts and thought these could be very plausible and effective, however, the main thrust was to also represent some UW constructs. It was our opinion from a starting point that some leadership have forgotten some great options that SOF can provide. Earlier in the year was a piece that was to readdress some IW shortcomings in today's military.

    Link for reference: http://www.mccormicktribune.org/publ...larwarfare.pdf
    Thanks for the link and intriquing thoughts !

    Examples: This effort may result in a variety of new specialties such as tribal liaisons, human terrain experts, cyber reconnaissance scouts, knowledge networkers, information expediters, continuity controllers and gap managers.

  4. #4
    Council Member slapout9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,818

    Default

    S2MSSI, thanks for the link, I was trying to find this.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •