Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: The Law of Occupation ?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Rocky Mtn Empire
    Posts
    473

    Default

    Wallace's intent wasn't to give a class on the Geneva Convention. It was to introduce some of the lesser known requirements of "occupation." The "we only do kinetic" approach to warfare in general and regime change in specific doesn't cut it.

  2. #2
    Council Member Stan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    3,817

    Default Indeed...Thanks Colonel !

    Quote Originally Posted by Old Eagle View Post
    Wallace's intent wasn't to give a class on the Geneva Convention. It was to introduce some of the lesser known requirements of "occupation." The "we only do kinetic" approach to warfare in general and regime change in specific doesn't cut it.
    I might add:
    • Leavenworth is not in the habit of dumping reams of paper
    • The US Army does not promote her folks to O-6 for nothin'


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •