Results 1 to 20 of 324

Thread: Homosexuality and Military Service (Merged thread)

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    273

    Default

    I'm going to defer to Infanteer on the topic of combat viability. (Mostly because he agrees with me )
    Quote Originally Posted by 82redleg View Post
    All right, what value does ending DA/DT provide?
    Equality. It is inarguable that gay soldiers receive unequal treatment in the military under DADT. Our founding documents make it clear that equality is a virtue in and of itself.

    Quote Originally Posted by 82redleg View Post
    Where is this right found? I haven't seen it anywhere. Or are you arguing that there should be a right to serve.
    Life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. The 9th Amendment applies, here. The reason the 9th Amendment exists is that the Founding Fathers feared that creating a specific list of rights could be taken as an exclusion of any rights not listed. Being denied entry into any government enterprise based on opinion of personal choices, rather than any actual deleterious effects related to entry, seems like exactly what the 9th Amendment was included to prevent.

    Quote Originally Posted by Deus Ex View Post
    I simply do not understand this. I cannot fathom how anyone thinks integrating females into combat arms and the repeal of DADT are in any way the linked. 82 already responded appropriately, but this seems to be a developing trend and it worries the hell out of me.
    I was mainly responding to JMA's assertion that the main reason to bar openly gay soldiers from serving is that it would create sexual tension.
    Last edited by motorfirebox; 12-26-2010 at 11:36 PM.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •