Results 1 to 20 of 24

Thread: Obsolete Restrictions on Public Diplomacy Hurt U.S. Outreach and Strategy

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member Cannoneer No. 4's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    140

    Default We did not call it “propaganda,”

    We did not call it “propaganda,” for that word in German hands had come to be associated with lies and corruptions. Our work was educational and informative only, for we had such confidence in our case as to feel that only fair presentation of its facts was needed.8 --George Creel

    from Propaganda: Can a Word Decide a War? by DENNIS M. MURPHY and JAMES F. WHITE http://www.carlisle.army.mil/usawc/P...umn/murphy.htm

  2. #2
    Council Member Cannoneer No. 4's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    140

    Default US Code, Title 22, Chapter 18, Subchapter V, § 1461–1a

    Except as provided in section 1461 of this title and this section, no funds authorized to be appropriated to the United States Information Agency shall be used to influence public opinion in the United States, and no program material prepared by the United States Information Agency shall be distributed within the United States. This section shall not apply to programs carried out pursuant to the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2451 et seq.). The provisions of this section shall not prohibit the United States Information Agency from responding to inquiries from members of the public about its operations, policies, or programs.

    There is no more United States Information Agency.

    Lawfare sucks!

    The Smith-Mundt Act of 1948:
    Comments, Critiques, and the Way Forward
    by Bryan Hill

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •