View Poll Results: Is the era of the big footprint over?

Voters
27. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, we won't be seeing more Fallujahs any time soon.

    3 11.11%
  • No, you defeat insurgencies with boots on the ground.

    6 22.22%
  • The enemy gets a vote too.

    18 66.67%
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: "The era of the big footprint is over."

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    The Green Mountains
    Posts
    356

    Default "The era of the big footprint is over."

    Heard Professor Bruce Hoffman say that, almost in passing, during a talk on Al Qaeda (on the march, 2008 will be "al Qaeda's year" he thinks) on Friday. He's certainly not the first, I have an old paper Steve Metz co-wrote somewhere on my hard drive arguing that we shouldn't be basing ground forces expansion on the expectation of more OIFs.

    But have Iraq and Afghanistan, and the modern media climate, soured the West on large-scale, boots on the ground COIN? Are small, interagency advisory teams scattered around the globe the way of the future in fighting insurgency? Or did the failure to catch Bin Laden in 2001 prove the need for Western commitment of substantial amounts of ground troops in key circumstances?
    Last edited by Granite_State; 01-27-2008 at 04:43 PM. Reason: Elaboration

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •