Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: Is it in the US' Interest to Support Israel?

  1. #21
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    203

    Default Some thoughts

    Todays top story on the BBC’s site. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7280026.stm
    Gaza's humanitarian situation is at its worst since Israel occupied the territory in 1967, say UK-based human rights and development groups.
    They include Amnesty International, Save the Children, Cafod, Care International and Christian Aid.
    They criticise Israel's blockade on Gaza as illegal collective punishment which fails to deliver security. . .
    From William’s last post
    I am not sure I understand this. Are you saying that you can appease the Arab extremists by not seeking to assist Israel in its national defence?
    The US is not just assisting Israel in its national defence, it is aiding and abetting the brutal subjugation of millions of people over which Israel has control. Guaranteed US Security Council vetoes make it pointless trying to condemn actions which are roundly condemned by the General Assembly and would precipitate a full scale military invasion if they were the Jewish or Christian minority in Iran.
    The problem the salafi-jihadist have with Israel is their existence. That's not negotiable. At worst the Jihadists seek to kill every Jew in the Middle-East, and at best crush them back to a stateless ethnic minority. That's what is at stake.

    It's an utter myth to suggest that the biggest reason the Arab/Islamist extremists hate the US is because of their support for Israel. They hate the US anyway, especially the Iranians, because of all the US interference in their country, over the last 50 years, and about 200 "good" reasons. The Iraq invasion may well have a lot to do with anti-US feeling. Hating Jews is just their cherry on the cake.
    Yes many Muslim’s – and I – have a problem with the existence of Israel, not just the extremists. Two thousand and eight years ago I believe the Romans were in the processes of conducting a census in Palestine, but I do not have the results to hand, however I assume a fairly high percentage were Jewish. About 100 years ago the population was mainly Muslim and about 5% Jewish, today I think we are back to about 75% Jewish (in Israel excluding the occupied territories). Were I a Palestinian I would be wondering if Balfour and friends had the right to set in train the replacement of my people with some other people whose ancestor had once lived here. I am not sure that there is a lot to be gained in picking our moment in time and trying to right the wrongs of our ancestors what we can and should do is look at the current situation and our recent actions and policies and start from there. I would argue that the level of financial/military, and more importantly political, aid to Israel is well beyond the level needed to protect it. I would further argue this level of aid, and cover, is letting it trample the civil rights and any chance of earning a living of those in the occupied territories and is breeding terrorists and sympathy for their cause. Israel is in a relatively comfortable position; all the best land, a per capita GDP well beyond that of their neighbours (and only a distant dream for Gazans), a military equipped with all the latest kit. Half the world’s population live on $2/day and the US is giving nearly that to each Israeli, 70% of Gazans are now on $1/day which is less than the US aid per Israeli. Where is their incentive to negotiate a more equitable arrangement? If the US took the position 'we will help you protect yourselves but you are perfectly capable of standing on your own feet now, we are not going to bankroll you or give you political cover if you oppress your people and we will redirect aid to the occupied territories to help them become self sufficient' that might send a more useful message to both Israel and the rest of the Muslim world and move us closer to a two state solution (a US aim – at least on paper).

    Note how Morocco does not care about Israel's existence, as some 18% of Israelis are Moroccans.
    Note how Turkey, an Islamic country, is a de facto ally of Israel.
    OK I don’t get the 18% bit but I would lay good money that the average Moroccan cares very much about the plight of the Palestinians in the occupied territories. As to Turkey they are a major recipient of US aid and, like Egypt, are aware that not being too vocal re Israel is a necessary evil if they want to keep the money and to pursue more important domestic concerns – controlling the Kurds for Turkey and not having anyone look too closely at their human rights/democratic process for Egypt.

    Viewed from an Israeli perspective, US support is not "unconditional." What is more, the majority of Israelis do not want unconditional US support. What they want is the US's assistance to ensure their survival.

    99% Israelis know far more about the Middle East, than 99% of Americans and see the US as generally culturally ignorant, especially when it comes to the Arabs, so taking advice/pressure from the US about foreign policy and national survival is not well received.
    With their knowledge of ME history do you think the average Israeli would think they got a fair shake if they had been dumped in Palestine after the Holocaust and found them selves to day in the ghettos of Gaza with occasional fuel, electricity, water, health care and no chance of work as no business can survive with unpredictable access to raw material or markets. I am sure they would be fighting a valiant David and Goliath terrorist war against their oppressors as they did at the foundation of their state. The British administrators of the Palestinian mandate had little doubt who the terrorist were.

    Adam’s
    if the Palestinians ever stop electing terrorists then we can talk about aid.
    It was going to be impossible to write this without talking about terrorists so here goes. Why are Hamas beyond the pail and Fatah not? Both have suicide bombers and rockets launched in their name, the difference is that Hamas are not willing to accept Israel’s right to exist because – like me – they have severe doubts that it was within the prevue of a whole load of white middle-aged Christian from some other part of the world to give away their ancestral lands to a bunch of foreigners who were being shipped in from another continent. I also don’t make a distinction between terrorism by individuals, groups or states for me it is a question how you behave not your politics or who you are acting against. I regret that this definition is not very widely applied and many states, and the US is definitely one of them, apply the term in a rather bizarre and arbitrary fashion. Friendly states can get away with murder (literally) and the same or lesser crimes from others are likely to bring a flood of sanctions. Well meaning – if of dubious legality – interventions like Iraq can lead to hundreds of thousands of additional civilian deaths but no one has the power to call the states responsible to account. Some idiot firing rockets, with the targeting accuracy of a big firework, from Gaza is not the main problem and is never going to be responsible for the kind of death toll I would attribute to a political leader of a state like yours or mine.
    Last edited by JJackson; 03-06-2008 at 01:34 PM.

  2. #22
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    389

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JJackson View Post
    Adam’s
    It was going to be impos'sible to write this without talking about terrorists so here goes. Why are Hamas beyond the pail and Fatah not? Both have suicide bombers and rockets launched in their name, the difference is that Hamas are not willing to accept Israel’s right to exist because – like me – they have severe doubts that it was within the purvue of a whole load of white middle-aged Christian from some other part of the world to give away their ancestral lands to a bunch of foreigners who were being shipped in from another continent. I also don’t make a distinction between terrorism by individuals, groups or states for me it is a question how you behave not your politics or who you are acting against. I regret that this definition is not very widely applied and many states, and the US is definitely one of them, apply the term in a rather bizarre and arbitrary fashion. Friendly states can get away with murder (literally) and the same or lesser crimes from others are likely to bring a flood of sanctions. Well meaning – if of dubious legality – interventions like Iraq can lead to hundreds of thousands of additional civilian deaths but no one has the power to call the states responsible to account. Some idiot firing rockets, with the targeting accuracy of a big firework, from Gaza is not the main problem and is never going to be responsible for the kind of death toll I would attribute to a political leader of a state like yours or mine.

    I'm not going into an argument over this because it's not going to go anywhere. In the end I really don't give a damn about what you just said and this is why:

    1. Hamas supports, trains and directs operations targeting civilians. With the only possible goal being to inflict numerous civilians fatalities. Military targets are legitimate. They may be illegal and quite often just as abhorrent, but they are a legitimate targets. The attack on the USS Cole was criminal abhorrent and I had hoped everyone of the people involved in it were found and shot. On the other hand, a US military ship is a legitimate target. On the other hand dressing up as civilians to sneak in close does bring this back up to a non-legitimate action. Still, it is not an attack on civilians. I'm sorry if I am offending anyone in the military with this. I do condemn and hat the low lives that would and do perpetrate such attacks, but I must acknowledge that this is to some extent a lesser offense than targeting civilians
    2. They utilize children in their conflict. They use them as bombers, they are giving 5 year old ak47's and they are molding them into little mindless terrorists. They have little TV shows and school programs teaching these children that killing civilians is OK and in fact a very good thing to do. In my opinion, anyone wherever they are and whomever they are who supports and/or promotes such should be dragged out into the street and shot. (forget about what “crime” it is, they have done something so terrible it doesn't matter) (edit) (I want to make sure no one actually believes I am advocating this. As much as I would care to I understand that this is not a practical option no matter how much some of us may like it to be.) (edit) Children are out of bound and that is that. Until this on its own is stopped, there will be no help of any group that is in any way tied to this.
    3. If the Palestinians were out in the street protesting peacefully and asking for simply human dignity, I am sure both Owen and I would be on their side. The problem is that this isn't the case. They do not even have the common sense to not fly the posters calling for the seas to run red with Jewish blood. If I to this day condemn the IRA and have the most sickening feeling when ever I think that there are people in my country who would, have and do raise money for their actions do you think there is any way I can see clear to having sympathy for this “cause.” I do feel bad for the Palestinians caught in this. Primarily, the children. This is not of their fault, but when they grow up and they have been trained into that form, I know longer have sympathy. This is the same way I feel bad for a kid growing up in Newark who because of his situation gets caught up in a bad crowd. When he grows up and gets involved in serious criminal activity (rape, murder, shootings, etc.) the sympathy goes away. I'd like to help those caught in the middle, but there is no way to do this now.

    For me that is how it is, and the rest is immaterial. I know you have a different view of “terrorists” so lets avoid this word. Allow me to amend the statement you quoted.


    [/quote] If they ever stop electing “a party that doesn't support the things I described above” then we can talk about aid.[/quote]

    Sorry if this is a little strong or harsh JJackson, but I wanted to make this very clear for everyone.



    Adam L
    Last edited by Adam L; 03-06-2008 at 02:48 PM.

  3. #23
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    389

    Default

    If the Palestinians were "Buddhist Terrorists" peacefully lighting themselves on fire in the middle of the streets (this is a real showing of religious strength) I think there would be a lot of sympathy for their cause. I am not suggesting they do such, personally I think that goes a bit far, but I am pointing out the wide array of other extreme and media grabbing protest methods at their disposal.

    Adam L

  4. #24
    Council Member William F. Owen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The State of Partachia, at the eastern end of the Mediterranean
    Posts
    3,947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JJackson View Post
    Yes many Muslim’s – and I – have a problem with the existence of Israel, not just the extremists.
    Well that honesty at least separates you from most of the Europeans who believe Jews have no right to the safe and secure homeland of their fore fathers.

    I know my Middle-East history extremely well as, historically, both sides of my family were intimately involved with both creating and opposing of the formation of the State of Israel - voted into existence by the UN.

    I am not posting here to argue with people as to why my home and family should be safe from bigots and extremists. I just know we should be.

    ...and yes, poor Gaza.

    I will clarify one statistic you asked for. 18% of post 1948 immigrants to Israel from Arab countries (>750,000) are of Moroccan origin.
    Infinity Journal "I don't care if this works in practice. I want to see it work in theory!"

    - The job of the British Army out here is to kill or capture Communist Terrorists in Malaya.
    - If we can double the ratio of kills per contact, we will soon put an end to the shooting in Malaya.
    Sir Gerald Templer, foreword to the "Conduct of Anti-Terrorist Operations in Malaya," 1958 Edition

  5. #25
    Moderator Steve Blair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    Ok...this is rapidly going nowhere. Sorry, folks, but it's closing time here at the SWC pub and grill.
    "On the plains and mountains of the American West, the United States Army had once learned everything there was to learn about hit-and-run tactics and guerrilla warfare."
    T.R. Fehrenbach This Kind of War

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •