Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Theater Military Advisory and Assistance Group (TMAAG)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member max161's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Posts
    142

    Default I understand the CSA has disapproved the TMAAG

    concept in its current form saying that it is not an Army requirement.
    David S. Maxwell
    "Irregular warfare is far more intellectual than a bayonet charge." T.E. Lawrence

  2. #2
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Rocky Mtn Empire
    Posts
    473

    Default

    That's the rumor floating around here. -- See post on "outsiders view" (or whatever). That piece just gets scarier and scarier.

  3. #3
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default Furhter deponent sayeth not...

    Posting rules preclude what I'd like to say. Sheesh.

  4. #4
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Rocky Mtn Empire
    Posts
    473

    Default The key now is determining what comes next

    In the CSA's defense, TMAAG scratched only a small part of the security force assistance itch, and at substantial cost. TMAAG was Army only, Phase zero only, tactical only, training only, foreign militaries only. It still may have been a step in the right direction. The key now is to see how the USG develops the required capabilities and capacities to successfully engage with foreign security forces in order to build partner capacity.

    The true SFA requirement is
    joint, interagency, intergovernmental and multinational
    across all phases of operations
    from the ministerial/institutional level down to the individual soldier/policeman, border guard, etc
    includes organizing, training, equipping, rebuilding and advising (incl combat, if necessary) those forces
    includes military, police, paramilitary and infrastructure forces

    The argument that "we'll never do another Iraq" is irrelavent. We need to actively build partner capacity before things "go south", but also to build potential coalition partners for future operations.

  5. #5
    Council Member Ron Humphrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    1,099

    Question Does this mean -

    The only way something like this is going to come about is through a government led effort and organization ?

    Like USA oops forgot that's not happenin
    Any man can destroy that which is around him, The rare man is he who can find beauty even in the darkest hours

    Cogitationis poenam nemo patitur

  6. #6
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default All true

    Quote Originally Posted by Old Eagle View Post
    In the CSA's defense, TMAAG scratched only a small part of the security force assistance itch, and at substantial cost. TMAAG was Army only, Phase zero only, tactical only, training only, foreign militaries only. It still may have been a step in the right direction. The key now is to see how the USG develops the required capabilities and capacities to successfully engage with foreign security forces in order to build partner capacity.
    Though I acknowledge a cost, I'm unsure the cost was that great.
    The true SFA requirement is
    joint, interagency, intergovernmental and multinational across all phases of operations from the ministerial/institutional level down to the individual soldier/policeman, border guard, etc. includes organizing, training, equipping, rebuilding and advising (incl combat, if necessary) those forces includes military, police, paramilitary and infrastructure forces.
    Agreed, an that's indicative of one flaw in Goldwater-Nichols and the creation of Military tribunes...
    The argument that "we'll never do another Iraq" is irrelavent. We need to actively build partner capacity before things "go south", but also to build potential coalition partners for future operations.
    Very much true...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •