Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 65

Thread: Who were/are the Greatest Political Leaders

  1. #1
    Council Member Rob Thornton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Fort Leavenworth, KS
    Posts
    1,510

    Default Who were/are the Greatest Political Leaders in War

    Some time ago we had a very popular thread entitled "Who are the Greatest Generals". It evolved to become more then just council member's lists of favorites, or even lists of favorites with historical examples of military wins. It became a discussion about what makes a great military leader.

    Why not give political leaders equal play? War is a way of achieving a political end, be it a calculated action, or a reaction. There is art in everything from building allies, to securing the gains toward the long term that were achieved in the decision, to as a political leader in the defeated polity convincing the victorious parties that its is in their best interest to make a better peace for the defeated. It can also include political leaders who at the same time were the defacto military leader.

    The idea is to have a discussion about where in history (recent to ancient) political leadership was best employed in war - leading into war, during war and concluding the war.

    Best, Rob
    Last edited by Rob Thornton; 05-01-2008 at 10:51 AM.

  2. #2
    Council Member SteveMetz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Carlisle, PA
    Posts
    1,488

    Default

    I'd give more credit to political leaders who avoided war in dangerous times with significant damage to national interests rather than the architects of war. (As I was listening to Terry Gross interview a Marine colonel who spent three years as a casualty assistance officer yesterday, it dawned on me that the concept of "victory" in war is an oxymoron. All participants are losers; there are just different gradations of losing).

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    223

    Default Somebody has to go first

    I'll start the list off by nominating Bismarck as the most successful political leader of the last few centuries. He was a master of internal politics who bent a series of governments to his will; he was a visionary who pursued a singular goal over a period of decades; he used military force to gain his objectives in a series of wars, but he prepared the way for those wars by setting the diplomatic preconditions for success; he understood and manipulated his international opponents; he limited the objectives of war to what was desirable and achieveable and consciously abandoned force when his overall strategic goal was achieved; he used the military but allowed the professionals to get on with the conduct of the war - until they threatened to upset the proper relationship between policy and war, when he brought them up short; and finally, he created an international system that preserved the peace and Germany's place in the sun for more than a generation.

    Yes, he was not a nice man. Yes, his system broke down when lesser men - including one certified congenital idiot - tried to operate it. Still, WWI was neither inevitable nor directly the fault of Bismarck. All in all, I can't think of a more successful practitioner. And, he was a cavalryman.

  4. #4
    Council Member SteveMetz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Carlisle, PA
    Posts
    1,488

    Default

    What about Prime Minister Count Rupert Mountjoy of the Duchy of Grand Fenwick?

  5. #5
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    West Point New York
    Posts
    267

    Default

    Nothing fancy here; just the basics.

    I will go with Abe Lincoln; all time greatest political leader in war, ever ("ever" being intentionally said with my own American exceptionalist bias admitted)

    gian

  6. #6
    Council Member Ron Humphrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    1,099

    Default All said and done

    Quote Originally Posted by Gian P Gentile View Post
    Nothing fancy here; just the basics.

    I will go with Abe Lincoln; all time greatest political leader in war, ever ("ever" being intentionally said with my own American exceptionalist bias admitted)

    gian
    I could agree with this one. The man definately had to deal with quite a variety of issues and in doing so was pretty effective.

    That said I think several of the Roman leaders would probably be good examples considering that they were not only politicians but warriors and quite often at the same time. And thats not even looking at the economics, social developments, etc.

    Finally may be more to some leaders here than we realize. It's often difficult to truly know what someone actually dealt with and how till about 30 years later. So the jurys still out on some of them.
    Any man can destroy that which is around him, The rare man is he who can find beauty even in the darkest hours

    Cogitationis poenam nemo patitur

  7. #7
    Council Member Tom Odom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    DeRidder LA
    Posts
    3,949

    Default

    Franklin Roosevelt

    Winston Churchill

    Joseph Stalin

    All had their issues and all had their faults, individually and collectively. Bot in a strange brew way those faults played into each other and cemented what was an effective alliance

    Truman: in Korea he grew into the job when it counted most

  8. #8
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    567

    Default

    I like Ike. (He should've stumped on Monty instead of OKing Market Garden, but he was still wearing a uniform then.)

    I agree with Steve, therefore JKF deserves a mention for the Cuban missile crisis: civil rights too.

    Constantine accomplished a lot and had a long lasting influence.
    Last edited by Rank amateur; 05-01-2008 at 04:09 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveMetz View Post
    Sometimes it takes someone without deep experience to think creatively.

  9. #9
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default JFK? JFK? Ah, the guy quietly that traded a ring

    of IRBMs around the western USSR for a few in Cuber and couched it as a 'victory.' Yeah. Same guy that escalated Viet Nam and okayed the departure of Diem and attempts on Castro...

    Yeah...

  10. #10
    Moderator Steve Blair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    Not a fan of JFK either, honestly.

    Lincoln and Bismarck are good calls, and I'm rather tempted to toss in Frederick the Great as well. Nixon had some good foreign policy calls, though his domestic paranoia brought him down. Gonna have to ponder this one some more....
    "On the plains and mountains of the American West, the United States Army had once learned everything there was to learn about hit-and-run tactics and guerrilla warfare."
    T.R. Fehrenbach This Kind of War

  11. #11
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    717

    Default

    The Roman farmer-turned-dictator Cincinnatus. Although this would probably be more of an example of one of history's great citizens more than one of its great political leaders.

  12. #12
    Council Member SteveMetz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Carlisle, PA
    Posts
    1,488

    Default

    Interestingly, no one has proposed Reagan.

  13. #13
    Council Member Cavguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    Posts
    1,127

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Odom View Post
    Winston Churchill
    A good choice for WWII, but just coming off of a ME history course, one can argue that his dreams of empire played a prime role in creating the nightmare that is the modern Middle East after WWI.
    "A Sherman can give you a very nice... edge."- Oddball, Kelly's Heroes
    Who is Cavguy?

  14. #14
    Council Member Van's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Posts
    414

    Default Claudius?

    The poor, challenged, son-of-a-gun got thrown into it after Gaius Caligula was shanked. Noone expected him to do anything right. He promptly proceeded to fix a bunch of the problems that had been piling up since the second half of Tiberius' reign.
    And he had some experience managing Small Wars in Britain and Dalmatia (now the Balkans).

    The Dukes of Venice of the Fifteenth and Sixteenth centuries (collectively) rate some consideration also. They had a good grasp of the instruments of power even if they didn't use our terminology.

    Ronald Reagan is a worthy nomination, but probably needs some time to historically season.

  15. #15
    Council Member SteveMetz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Carlisle, PA
    Posts
    1,488

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Van View Post
    The poor, challenged, son-of-a-gun got thrown into it after Gaius Caligula was shanked. Noone expected him to do anything right. He promptly proceeded to fix a bunch of the problems that had been piling up since the second half of Tiberius' reign.
    And he had some experience managing Small Wars in Britain and Dalmatia (now the Balkans).

    The Dukes of Venice of the Fifteenth and Sixteenth centuries (collectively) rate some consideration also. They had a good grasp of the instruments of power even if they didn't use our terminology.

    Ronald Reagan is a worthy nomination, but probably needs some time to historically season.

    This reminds me of listening to Mike Vlahos and Ed Luttwak argue about 5th century Roman tactics (partially in Latin) a few years. As a plumber's son from Elk Hills, West Virginia, I couldn't help but be bemused.

  16. #16
    Council Member Tom Odom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    DeRidder LA
    Posts
    3,949

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cavguy View Post
    A good choice for WWII, but just coming off of a ME history course, one can argue that his dreams of empire played a prime role in creating the nightmare that is the modern Middle East after WWI.
    No disagreement and that would be one of his "flaws" that gave him strength in WWII. As a dyed in the wool Imperialist, he was a most useful offset for FDR's naivete in dealing with Stalin.

    Glad you are doing grad work on the Mid East. Keep ears and mind open, my friend.

    Tom

  17. #17
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Rancho La Espada, Blanchard, OK
    Posts
    1,065

    Default For Americans

    George Washington should be at, or near, the top of any list. He presided over the conflictive Constitutional Convention, established the nature of the Presidency as an institution, the supremacy of the Union (in the Whishy Rebellion) and civilian control of the military - civ president commnads troops.

    Charles De Gaulle succeeded in giving France a modern and stable government such as it never had before.

    Ataturk brought Turkey into the modern world.

    The Meiji Restoration leadership of Japan and Douglas MacArthur as Shogun after WWII.

    William of Orange led the Glorious Revolution of 1689 that made modern Britain.

    Alvaro Obregon brought stability to Mexico in the 1920s.

    Jose Napoleon Duarte and his successor, Alfredo Cristiani, brought the El Sal civil war to a successful close and did a better job on reconciliation than Lincoln's successors did in the US.

    Anyway, those are some of my candidates with reasons for those of you who care.

    Cheers

    JohnT

  18. #18
    Council Member Vic Bout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    inside the noose that is my tie
    Posts
    51

    Default Howzabout TheodoreRex?

    Teddy Roosevelt, that gunboat-totin', big-game shootin', banana republic seizin', national park endowin' cowboy, with a mustache as big as all outdoors...

    (whose trophy room in the white house, BTW, was immediately upon occupation dismantled by first lady Hillary)
    "THIS is my boomstick!"

  19. #19
    Council Member SteveMetz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Carlisle, PA
    Posts
    1,488

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John T. Fishel View Post
    Jose Napoleon Duarte and his successor, Alfredo Cristiani, brought the El Sal civil war to a successful close and did a better job on reconciliation than Lincoln's successors did in the US.

    Anyway, those are some of my candidates with reasons for those of you who care.

    Cheers

    JohnT
    I was thinking of him but, man, thinks were screwed up at the time he left office. Maybe Magsaysay.

  20. #20
    Council Member SteveMetz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Carlisle, PA
    Posts
    1,488

    Default OK, I Have the Ultimate Answer

    Ho Chi Minh

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •