Germany (catch all, incl. terrorism)

[uwew]

I would not blame this on the German Army. This is a reflection of Germany's government and a pretty clear metric that they do not perceive any great German interest's to be at stake.

IMHO the German government does not reflect about German interest.
They think about how something is going to influence the polls
or the next election. So they send soldiers abroad to be seen as acting
decisively, defending freedom and human rights or fighting global terrorism.
On the other hand, they do not want to take responsibility for casualties,
so force protection is the no1 priority for those forces they send.

Reportedly however, a significant portion of the foreign fighters who have traveled to Pakistan to support AQ are German. One must look at both of these circumstances together to understand either one, I suspect.

These fighters are mainly naturalized Turks and Arabs. I do not think that
their taking part in global jihadism is really influencing German policy in Afghanistan.

[Fuchs]

IMHO the German government does not reflect about German interest.
They think about how something is going to influence the polls
or the next election. So they send soldiers abroad to be seen as acting
decisively, defending freedom and human rights or fighting global terrorism.
On the other hand, they do not want to take responsibility for casualties,
so force protection is the no1 priority for those forces they send.

Participation in ISAF is rather a problem in elections than helpful in any way. A stable majority is against the involvement. Even party bases are largely against participation. It looks like stupid foreign policy gaming to me; keyword UNSC seat.


@jcustis:
Restrictions changed in iirc 2009. Previously, German troops in Afghanistan pretty much had restrictions as if they were policemen in Germany.



Overall it's a bit as for the Italians in 1940-43; neither did we prepare for this mess nor are we interested. It's no wonder that the troops don't gain a reputation for fierce activity. Moral is still > everything else.


I've been saying for a decade that this idiocy of so-called "out-of-area missions" is not indicative about our military potential. The Bundeswehr has deep in its institution what it takes to wage a war ferociously and send bolts of fear into opposing armies - but there's simply no reason to build and unleash this beast.
Tired bus drivers are a greater threat to us than all terrorists combined.
The whole ISAF thing is a mere self-inflicted cutting of our arms over and over again for no rational purpose.
The official ISAF mission that the government still refers to is an idiotic daydream.


Most Germans realise that it's not our defence that happens in AFG "Deutschland wird am Hindukusch verteidigt" - "Germany is being defended in the Hindu Kush"), but political adventurism if not braindead followership.
I personally are especially frustrated by the supposed attempts to lend "relevance" to NATO - as if keeping peace for its members in Europe wasn't a great mission and achievement already.

It does not matter whether this story is true or false. It is all about
perception. And Mr. Korn's perception seems to be that Germans in
Afghanistan are a bunch of useless drunks.

Some people are serious and others are mere morons.
The Americans are gifted in giving morons heir own national newspaper OP-Eds, radio talk shows, think tank jobs...
This does not mean that their opinion has any value.

[jcustis]

The Americans are gifted in giving morons heir own national newspaper OP-Eds, radio talk shows, think tank jobs...

Unfortunately, every nation does that. We do not hold a monopoly in that regard.

[Fuchs]

Well, in Germany I know only three persons who (still) punch far above their weight: An economist who's almost always 180° wrong, a super-arrogant bank CEO and a special interest minority guy who should never have recovered from the huge scandal he had a few years ago.

Here's no real think tank culture and no such pundit culture as in the U.S..


In the U.S., it appears as if for every tiny topic there's someone ready to offer a stupid opinion about it on national media. This turns such opinions into quite useless indicators.

[Entropy]

Guess we should be thankful the so-called "national media" isn't nearly as important as it once was.

On the topic at hand I can't give an opinion since I had no interaction with the Germans during my time in Afghanistan.

[Infanteer]

I can't offer anything either, although I've heard lots of second hand stories about some frustration in the early ISAF days (think 2004-ish) that we had working with other NATO countries and specifically Germany. One staff officer seemed to figure that the Euro contribution to NATO was a bunch of uniformed tourists.

I can see where this came from; as Fuchs alluded to the Afghan mission seems to be a political distraction for Germany as opposed to a top issue for us in the Anglosphere.

Fuchs post above from 0227 PM sounds pretty good to me - I can't see how the German Army, considering its professional and social history and the brains behind building the modern Bundeswehr, can have its potential judged by its performance in a sideshow in Afghanistan that it never really had the heart for.