Results 1 to 20 of 355

Thread: All matters MRAP JLTV (merged thread)

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #14
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by William F. Owen View Post
    A General Concept of Infantry Mobility

    I would be interested in the board’s opinions as to MRAP and JLTV “type” vehicles as a base line for general (not all) infantry mobility.
    Perhaps a better concept for "general infantry mobility" might be the humble HMMWV. It has the following benefits:

    * It comes in a wide variety of unarmored, semi-armored, or armored configurations.
    * It can go places that MRAPS don't dare.
    * It has a lower life-cycle cost than any APC or MRAP.
    * It has a much lower logistics footprint than an APC or MRAP.
    * It has a much lower deployment footprint than an APC or MRAP.

    Yes, the HMMWV is not well protected vs IEDs, mines or HMG fire (or really anything). But that's what APCs and IFVs are for right?
    Last edited by B.Smitty; 12-20-2011 at 09:38 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Matters Blackwater (Merged thread)
    By SWJED in forum PMCs and Entrepreneurs
    Replies: 318
    Last Post: 04-06-2018, 11:32 AM
  2. Colombia, FARC & insurgency (merged thread)
    By Wildcat in forum Americas
    Replies: 174
    Last Post: 02-09-2017, 03:49 PM
  3. Terrorism in the USA:threat & response
    By SWJED in forum Law Enforcement
    Replies: 486
    Last Post: 11-27-2016, 02:35 PM
  4. The David Kilcullen Collection (merged thread)
    By Fabius Maximus in forum Doctrine & TTPs
    Replies: 451
    Last Post: 03-31-2016, 03:23 PM
  5. Replies: 69
    Last Post: 05-23-2012, 11:51 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •