it gets you an A - with a bonus for answer #3
Perhaps true as to some data (Jones denies anything he wrote was classified); but the devil is in proving what you quote:
So, a specific intent crime - and if Jones' bio is even half true that intent seems skinny to me. We need more facts.
Some comments - which illustrate why there are agency contracts, the PRB and other bothersome "stuff".
--------------------------------
Sharon Scranage (Operations Support Assistant) - Wiki Bio
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharon_Scranage
One wonders if she wasn't "honey-trapped". In any event, one network down the tubes from pillow talk.
She was prosecuted under the "Agee Act" - brief ref. to Agee here - elsewhere, there is lots of stuff on that saatana.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/ar...id=chix-sphere
Welch's death was not caused by Agee's book; but his death illustrated one of the dangers of disclosing the identity of officers and agents - Welch's identity was well known to terrorists in Greece.
----------------------------------------
And, leave it to the Telegraph to give us a catchy headline:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/portal/ma...t/ftcia107.xml
And a long article (7 pp.) in US News on the "pillow talk" class action filed with EEOC by attorney Janine Brookner representing the plaintiffs. Draw your own conclusions.
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/ar...0422/30cia.htm
Didn't find a url to the EEOC case file - it is getting too late.
Sex, Sin - and I Spy - an unbeatable combo.
--------------------------------------------------
And, since you nailed Pollard and Kadish, I can't dock you points for not reading my mind - I was thinking of the "AIPAC Case" - US v. Rosen, which can be found here:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/jud/aipac/index.html
Many pleadings - showing you what happens step by weary step in a Federal espionage case - starting at bottom with Larry Franklin's plea bargain.
If you have some time, they all would be worth reading - original docs beat what people say original docs say.
Bookmarks