Results 1 to 20 of 142

Thread: Georgia's South Ossetia Conflict - Military Commentary

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,007

    Default

    Fresh Russian report in Russian.

    http://www.cast.ru/comments/?id=351

  2. #2
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    I'm looking for the Russian lessons learned and for details about why a Russian general was wounded when he was with his advance guard during an ambush (I am not used to reports about modern generals - especially not Russian ones - leading from the front).

    So far I found this

    http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/doc...e-mountain.pdf
    The bad news is that Russia’s military performance was marred by inadequate equipment and organization. This point was underscored many times in the press to include by some prominent military figures. Electronic warfare systems did not work well, command and control was hampered by radios that performed poorly, and operations were disjointed due to an
    inadequate Global Satellite Navigation System (GLONASS). Night operations remained weak. In short, many of the same problems affecting the Russian armed forces in Chechnya were once again evident.
    ... that there were operational and combat support issues that left room for improvement. First, a lack of satellite support left the troops in an information deficit. The main problem was noted as “the lack of the requisite space grouping and GLONASS receivers.”26
    Electronic warfare systems were not used to suppress Georgia’s air defense systems and there was an absence of aircraft controllers. This caused armored columns to advance without the proper cover. Second, traditionally weak areas for the Russian army, such as nighttime actions, reconnaissance, communications, and logistical support, remain weaknesses. Night sighting devices are blinded by gunfire flashes and old tanks did not have global navigation systems or friend or foe systems. Third, it was rare to see vehicles
    fitted with shields or additional armor and, as a result, soldiers still prefer to ride on the outside of these vehicles where, if thrown off, they have a chance of surviving. There was poor interaction between tanks and motorized infantry units and, on occasion, units sometimes fired on one another. Fourth, there was a shortage of modern precision weapons in the Russian air
    force
    and virtually a total lack of drones. Pchela drones used in Chechnya are
    practically worn out. Finally, a 1998 decision to remove helicopters from the ground force has turned out to be a problem. There are no experts in army air aviation in the air force that know how to support ground troops.

    Recommendations by Tsyganok included creating information troops that take into account state and military media, modernizing forces by the end of 2015, reconstituting army aviation in the combined-arms armies and corps, and equipping aircraft and helicopter gunships with modern systems.

    It is also necessary to put more satellites in orbit (24 are needed but only 13 are in orbit) and procure more GLONASS receivers, to develop friend or foe systems, and to develop new radar stations. Journalist Mikhail Lukanin wrote that insufficient use was made of ground attack and tactical aviation. Other errors on the part of Russia’s armed forces were a lack of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) use, inadequate organization of communications, inadequate personal gear and equipment, and the absence of precision weapons.

    On 19 August the Presidium of the Globalization Problems Institute talked about South Ossetia and the question of information. They concluded that the Russian political and military leadership experienced indescribable panic and confusion when they realized Georgia was actually
    invading South Ossetia. They also wrote that the Russian military command acted with incompetence. Soldiers in many cases had no knowledge of how to counter Georgian guidance systems which were searching for Russian signals from radios and mobile telephones. They concluded that the main goal of the war was to draw the Russian army into military operations.
    ...
    Deputies wanted to know why all types of reconnaissance had failed, why there were serious organizational shortcomings, why there were such tangible losses in heavy equipment (helicopters, jet aircraft, etc.) against such a haphazard army, and why so much equipment
    broke down
    while the world was watching.
    Overall nothing unusual, such problems happen in most wars after long periods without involvement in a similar war - and the Russian forces were obviously impaired in their abilities by more than a decade of very tight budgets.

    I found no explanation for the WIA of a formation leader in an advance party, though.
    Last edited by davidbfpo; 10-10-2010 at 11:34 AM. Reason: Spacing

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,007

    Default

    I'm looking for the Russian lessons learned and for details about why a Russian general was wounded when he was with his advance guard during an ambush (I am not used to reports about modern generals - especially not Russian ones - leading from the front).
    Take a look at page 61.

    http://www.cast.ru/files/The_Tanks_of_August_sm_eng.pdf

    From Wikipedia in Russian you can find also some details

    Хрулёв, Анатолий Николаевич

  4. #4
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,007

    Default

    Sustainable Armor Capability for Small Powers: The Case of Georgia in the August War - Frederic Labarre

    http://www.bdcol.ee/files/files/docu...l%20Powers.pdf

  5. #5
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,007

    Default

    Many pic sets by Russian soldiers.

    Captured US Hummers http://twower.livejournal.com/518110.html#cutid1

    Russian airborne unit in Poti harbour http://twower.livejournal.com/518883.html#cutid1

    Georgian Senaki base http://twower.livejournal.com/519639.html#cutid1

    Airborne unit arrives by train http://twower.livejournal.com/520917.html#cutid1

  6. #6
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,007

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 433
    Last Post: 01-18-2017, 10:54 AM
  2. Vietnam collection (lessons plus)
    By SWJED in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 140
    Last Post: 06-27-2014, 04:40 AM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-14-2010, 02:38 PM
  4. CNAS-Foreign Policy Magazine U.S. Military Index
    By SWJED in forum Military - Other
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-20-2008, 02:41 AM
  5. Vietnam's Forgotten Lessons
    By SWJED in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 04-26-2006, 11:50 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •