The first step of an useful strategic analysis should be to sort the facts:
1) We have Ukraine.
2) We have the other countries like Poland, Czech Republic, Estonia...
The crucial difference between 1 and 2 is that the latter are in TWO organisations with mutual (military) assistence as part of the deal.
In contrast, the Ukraine is member of none. Therefore, to combine in an argument 1+2 does not pass a simple smell test.
In case of Ukraine, considering the economic reality with clear advantages on the western side, a low level economic war is the best we could do.
It is a kind of strategic hyperventilation when the events in Ukraine are sold as the equivalent of the occupation of parts of a NATO or EU member.
Bookmarks