Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Pakistani troops capture militant stronghold

  1. #1
    Council Member Culpeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Roswell, USA
    Posts
    540

    Default Pakistani troops capture militant stronghold

    http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D941LQ580.html

    "Now we have complete control in this area from where miscreants used to go to Afghanistan, Mohmand, Dir and Swat," army spokesman Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas told reporters flown in to Bajur by military helicopter. "Miscreants have been expelled or killed."


    Anybody got a map of the region? Is this important?
    "But suppose everybody on our side felt that way?"
    "Then I'd certainly be a damned fool to feel any other way. Wouldn't I?"


  2. #2
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,444

    Default

    See map here: http://www.longwarjournal.org/maps/pakistan-fata-15.php

    Two of the three regions mentioned, Dir and Swat, are the top-most red-colored regions on the map. Mohmand is SW of those regions, but does not appear to border them. That makes some of the statements a little confusing.
    Last edited by Schmedlap; 10-25-2008 at 06:22 PM. Reason: Factual error

  3. #3
    Council Member Danny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, North Carolina
    Posts
    141

    Default We've seen ...

    This Kabuki dance before, where Pakistan claims massive, magnificent gains, negotiates and makes "peace" with the Taliban, agrees to withdraw as long as the Taliban renounce violence, and so on the wheel goes. It's part of a show to keep U.S. dollars rolling in.

    They 'control' this area. Sure. That's why tribal elders who oppose the Taliban keep getting blown up.

  4. #4
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,366

    Default People flee the agency

    I am sure a few weeks ago there was a report that several hundred thousand refugees had fled the fighting in the Bajur Agency. That could explain how the Pakistani military have "won", most of the people had fled?

    davidbfpo

  5. #5
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default There was also a picure of the Army entering a

    fortified cave complex in Bajur that floated around several weeks ago. Note the lead sentence in the linked article says the offensive has been going for two months; Culpepper and Danny may have missed that. Clearing bad guys out of difficult terrain is not easy, more people should try it...

    I suspect they're doing the best they can with what they have.

    We could all wish they had more of many things -- they don't.

  6. #6
    Council Member Culpeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Roswell, USA
    Posts
    540

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken White View Post
    fortified cave complex in Bajur that floated around several weeks ago. Note the lead sentence in the linked article says the offensive has been going for two months; Culpepper and Danny may have missed that. Clearing bad guys out of difficult terrain is not easy, more people should try it...

    I suspect they're doing the best they can with what they have.

    We could all wish they had more of many things -- they don't.
    I didn't miss the two month campaign part I don't doubt the story. Just wondering of its importance as claimed later in the story. I'm not familiar with the region. Just sounded like some good news to me. Speaking of clearing out bad guys in tough terrain. I couldn't even get to a covey of quail out of an area of thick salt cedar brush today. I can't imagine the endurance it takes up in those mountains and valleys with the enemy behaving like a covey.
    "But suppose everybody on our side felt that way?"
    "Then I'd certainly be a damned fool to feel any other way. Wouldn't I?"


  7. #7
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default Sorry, no snark intended, wasn't clear from your first post....

    Quote Originally Posted by Culpeper View Post
    I didn't miss the two month campaign part I don't doubt the story. Just wondering of its importance as claimed later in the story. I'm not familiar with the region. Just sounded like some good news to me. Speaking of clearing out bad guys in tough terrain. I couldn't even get to a covey of quail out of an area of thick salt cedar brush today. I can't imagine the endurance it takes up in those mountains and valleys with the enemy behaving like a covey.
    It's another step; they've got to go very slowly or they'll arouse opposition instead of grudging tacit support from the local elders.

    The Hill tribes don't like the foreigners or AQ -- or even the Taliban -- but they also really do not like the flatlanders that are most of the Pakistani Army. So it's gotta be slow and easy; it'll take a while to get the are under some sort of control, possibly four or five more years but Pakistan will eventually be better off for it.

    I hear you on the clearing bit -- just going after Quail would wear me out nowadays...

  8. #8
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,366

    Default A glimpse into the agency

    From the BBC News: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/7701336.stm ; one of the better correspondents, although clearly on an officially guided tour.

    davidbfpo

  9. #9
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Fort Bragg, NC
    Posts
    21

    Default Recent News - Tohir Yuldashev

    Gentlemen,
    I was walking in the house, inbetween handing out candy to trick or treaters, and saw the Fox News ticker with information about Tohir Yuldashev. Yuldashev is the founder and leader of the IMU, and is suspected to be in Afghanistan. I didn't see the details on the ticker.

    I have been checking on line and looking for details on any ticker and haven't seen anything?

    Has anyone seen anything on this?

    Thanks.

  10. #10
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,021

    Default Bill Roggio scoops again

    Here is Fox's source.

    The Long War Journal
    US Predators strike again in Waziristan
    By Bill Roggio
    October 31, 2008 3:10 PM

    US unmanned Predator aircraft struck inside Pakistan's tribal areas for the second time today. After targeting a mid-level al Qaeda operative in North Waziristan, US Predators attacked a compound in Wana, South Waziristan.

    Six "foreigners" -- a term used to describe Arabs or other non-Pakistani al Qaeda members -- and a "tribesman" are reported to have been killed in the strike. The compound is said to be owned by Faz-e-Haq.

    Tahir Yuldalshev, the commander of a Uzbek terror group and Mullah Nazir were the target of the attack. A US intelligence source said that Nazir was wounded in the strike, “possibly seriously.”
    ...
    Yuldashev is the leader of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, an al Qaeda-linked group that operates out of Pakistan's tribal areas. Yuldashev enjoys a close relationship with Osama bin Laden. He is a member of al Qaeda's global shura council. Some of Yuldashev's fighters are believed to serve in the Black Guard, Osama bin Laden's personal corps of bodyguards.

    Yuldashev maintains tactical control of about one to two thousand fighters inside Pakistan and Afghanistan, US intelligence officials told The Long War Journal in the past. His fighters are active in eastern Afghanistan, where they attack Coalition and Afghan forces. .....
    http://www.longwarjournal.org/archiv...ors_strike.php

Similar Threads

  1. The Helmand Province (merged thread, not UK or USMC)
    By SWJED in forum OEF - Afghanistan
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 07-26-2014, 06:42 AM
  2. Lessons for Countering Al-Qaeda
    By Jedburgh in forum Adversary / Threat
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-01-2009, 08:07 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-20-2006, 07:14 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •