Results 1 to 20 of 79

Thread: Pre and post deployment support

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member reed11b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Olympia WA
    Posts
    531

    Default Actually ....

    I agree with 120mm
    ... so do I!
    Before anybody tries to throw out the "a history of MH correlates to higher rates of future MH" line, keep in mind that the same is true for physical injuries. Do we assume someone that sprains there ankle once is "broken" forever becouse of the increased possibilty of them getting a future sprain? The army is working hard on de-stigmatyzing PTSD, but what about plain old depression or anxiety? What about grief? Chaplains are allowed to keep confidentiality, why not have some available MH resources confidential?
    If the soldier is non-deployable or needs long term treatment, then yep, CO needs to know, but otherwise...
    Reed
    Quote Originally Posted by sapperfitz82 View Post
    This truly is the bike helmet generation.

  2. #2
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default Warrior Transitions: From Combat to Social Contract

    From an ethics class. Excellent resource for soldiers to read pre and post deployment...

    Warrior Transitions: From Combat to Social Contract

    By Shannon E. French, Ph.D.
    United States Naval Academy
    January 2005 JSCOPE

    http://www.usafa.edu/isme/JSCOPE05/French05.html

    I. Introduction: Penance and Purification

    Warriors must not feel that they are stepping into an entirely separate moral universe when they enter a combat zone and that they will never be held accountable for what they do there. As Bernard J. Verkamp explains in his important work, The Moral Treatment of Returning Warriors in Early Medieval and Modern Times, in the early Middle Ages, Christian knights returning from war were required to do penance for acts committed during wartime that were seen as “sinful” (including injuring and killing other humans), even if the war had been judged to be a just war by the Church. As Verkamp explains:

    [T]he Christian community of the first millennium generally assumed that warriors returning from battle would or should be feeling guilty and ashamed for all the wartime killing they had done. Far from having such feelings dismissed as insignificant or irrelevant, returning warriors were encouraged to seek resolution of them through rituals of purification, expiation, and reconciliation. To accommodate these latter needs, religious authorities of the period not infrequently imposed various and sundry penances on returning warriors, depending on the kind of war they had been engaged in, the number of their killings, and the intention with which they had been carried out.[1]

    On the surface, this seems a bit unfair. You go off to fight a war in what the Church has declared to be a just cause, you survive the horrors of war, and when you return the Church wants you to do penance and ask forgiveness for what you have done? At first blush, this practice seems only designed to produce self-loathing warriors.

    In fact, however, those who created the practice did not do so to punish warriors or make them regret their calling. They simply thought they understood what a warrior returning from war needs to do in order to transition successfully back into civilian life. Warriors need to recognize that what they did in service of their country was outside the norms of human existence and cannot be allowed in civilized society. The power of life and death that they were asked to exercise over others for the good of all must be relinquished (at least until they are called to war again). However necessary the evil in which they participated might have been, it was still an evil. By asking for forgiveness, warriors acknowledge that the rules that generally govern the social contract are valid and do apply to them. They accept ownership of their actions and symbolically ask to be allowed back into the fold of their community, released from the guilt of the acts they committed in the “fog of war.”

    A vast array of cultures across the globe have understood the need for some form of spiritual cleansing and ritualized transition for the warrior passing from the world of war into the world of peace. In ancient Rome, the Vestal Virgins would bathe returning soldiers from the Legions to purge them of the corruption of war. In Africa, returning Maasai warriors had purification rites, and Native Americans of the Plains tribes conducted sweat lodge ceremonies for their warriors before they could rejoin their tribes.[2] Embedded in these rituals are essential lessons from history about what we need to do for those who have transgressed the moral lines of civil society in order to protect and defend civilization for the rest of us.
    v/r

    Mike

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •