A recent science article reports some of the conclusions of a conference on the nature of warfare. See this link: http://www.newscientist.com/article/...html?full=true

In particular, the article addresses how warfare has affected human natural selection. We have the (possibly hardwired) advantage of being more cooperative when engaged in intergroup conflict (which can translate to sports and business), but there’s a suggestion that it’s only scalable to a point and that we may have been built for small wars (or at least small battles), not the giant, impersonal conflicts that we seem to be trained to execute in modern militaries. And, if this kind of stuff is hardwired biologically, do we have any chance of eliminating armed conflict by simply advancing “civilization”?

MAJ Roger Stanley