Results 1 to 20 of 58

Thread: Air Force Motorized Jaeger Regiment?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #29
    Council Member J Wolfsberger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    806

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Entropy View Post
    That's a bunch of hooey. The reality is that the Air Force doesn't perfectly conform to what some think the Air Force's role should be within the "full spectrum of warfare." That's a difference of opinion and perception, not fact. The Air Force isn't a subordinate arm of the Army, no matter how much some may wish for it. It therefore has a legitimate say in how best to use air forces in joint operations. It's fine if you disagree with the AF's official view (as many in the AF do), but the sweeping unsubstantiated hyperbole ("whining," "group of people without a clue") gets a little old as do statements of opinion presented as statements of fact.

    That the evidence for your point of view is apparently only obtainable from the mouths of a few drunk airmen doesn't help your argument much. Nor does using events that occurred two decades ago. Nor does your completely wrong statements about F-16's landing heavy - that's a serious problem for Marine/Navy aircraft returning to carriers (who often have to jettison ordnance in order to land), not so much for those using airfields.
    I'll take the well aimed (and deserved) hit for being blunt and heavy handed in my characterization.

    But I'll stand by the substance of my criticism (restated in a more professional manner):

    1. AF commitment to CAS is less than whole hearted.
    2. The prevailing attitude within the AF is that air power alone can win wars.
    3. There was (and I think, still is) an attitude that the AF was not being allowed to bring its full capability to bear in the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts.
    3.a. There was (and I think, still is) an attitude that civilian casualties aren't a negative factor, and may be a positive factor, in COIN.
    4. There was (and I think, still is) an attitude that the conflict in Iraq would have ended sooner if the AF had been allowed to inflict more damage and casualties.

    I may be wrong in my understanding - would certainly not be the first time. At present, I have a poor opinion of their doctrine and attitude. If you can point me to publications or articles that prove me wrong, I'd like to follow up. Regardless of my opinion of doctrine and attitude, the men and women wearing the AF uniform are still our comrades.
    Last edited by J Wolfsberger; 04-15-2009 at 07:59 PM. Reason: Accuracy
    John Wolfsberger, Jr.

    An unruffled person with some useful skills.

Similar Threads

  1. Shortchanging the Joint Doctrine Fight
    By slapout9 in forum Doctrine & TTPs
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 07-15-2008, 09:24 AM
  2. Abolish the Air Force
    By Xenophon in forum Military - Other
    Replies: 93
    Last Post: 11-22-2007, 03:52 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •