Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 36 of 36

Thread: Connecting the Dots...Mike's Model

  1. #21
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default Pschology

    Current academic research is focused on trying to determine the natural homeostatic point for individuals, communities, states, etc...What is this point or intersection? Christians call it walking with the Holy Spirit, Muslims call it submitting to Allah, Budhist call it Zen. Basically, it is living well, centered, and grounded- joyful even. Throughout life, we deviate to some small standard deviation, but most retain the homeostatic point.

    On the other hand, some are born off-center (schizophrenia, ADHD, etc...) Breakthrough research and study is finding the right combination of drug and psychotherapy to help those reach a homeostatic point.

    Sometimes, we take ourselves way outside the homeostatic point through substance abuse, or we experience a traumatic experience that unnerves us. Either way, the brain chemistry is severely altered.

    If we consider that most political theory and foreign policy theory stems from the assumption that everything in life is a contract, then we can merge psychology and social sciences to determine policy. It goes back to unresolved emotions after a divorce. It is what Nash missed in his assumptions.

    First, we have to discard the notion that we can win or control hearts and minds. It is as contrary as assuming we can "fix" a friend or family member that has a substance abuse issue. With that realization, we can act as an arbitrator or enabler.

  2. #22
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default An important aside...

    Before we can go further, you must understand how this has helped me. Now, after venting on SWJ, I'm regaining certain cognitive skills that I lost. I'm starting to do math in my head again and remember things once lost. The mental health specialist are astounded by it. I asked the neuro-psychologist about the answer for mTBI. She stated plainly that they don't know. All they know is that right now, the only solution is knowledge.

    I'm getting back to my homeostatic norm.

    So, I broke through on my own. It works. So many others have helped me, now, I'm simply giving back a bit.

    I think there are implications for everyone else....

    In the end, I'm only a soldier. Soldiers are generalist. Steven Pressfield best describes it in Tides of War

    Spear and sword, the manuals tell us, are the weapons of the infantryman. This is erroneous. Pick and shovel are his province, hoe and mattock, lever and crowbar; these and the mortarman's hod, the forester's axe and, beyond all, the quarryman's basket, that ubiquitous artifact the rookie learns to cobble on site of reeds or faggots. And get her to set aright, my fellow, tumpline upon the brow, bowl across the shoulders with no knot to gouge the flesh, for when she is laden with rubble and stone to the measure of half your weight, you must hump her. Up that ladder, see? To where the forms of timber await to receive the fill that will become the wall that will encircle the city, whose battlements we will scale and tear down and set up all over again.

    The soldier is a farmer. He knows how to shape the earth. He is a carpenter; he erects ramparts and palisades. A miner, he digs trenches and tunnels; a mason, he chisels a road from a sheer face of stone. The soldier is a physician who performs surgery without anesthetic, a priest who inters the dead without psalm. He is a philosopher who plumbs the mysteries of existence, a linguist who pronounces "pussy" in a dozen tongues. He is an architect and a demolition man, a fire brigadier and an incendiary. He is a beast who dwells in the dirt, a worm, owning a mouth and an anus and aught but appetite in between.

    The soldier looks upon horrors and affects to stand indifferent to them. He steps, oblivious, over corpses in the road and flops to wolf his gruel upon stones painted black with blood. He imbibes tales that would bleach the mane of Hades and tops them with his own, laughing, then turns about and donates his last obol to a displaced dame or urchin he will never see again except cursing him from a wall or rooftop, hurling down tiles and stones to cleave his skull.
    To most, that understanding is too much. This is but one reason that I submit that life is stark at least in the eye of the soldier.

    v/r

    Mike
    Last edited by MikeF; 04-19-2009 at 06:10 PM.

  3. #23
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,021

    Default The $25 hammer ...

    This is a true story, involving a friend who was a very good lawyer and later one of the best judges before whom I've practiced.

    The story is simple. A couple spent quite a few years building a successful construction business. Besides the business, they built up a decent enough collection of other assets - and a number of kids. My friend represented one of the spouses.

    Prior to the merits hearing, the lawyers and clients went through all of the required diversionary processes of conflict resolution (Michigan is big on that). That effort was rewarded with initial success; so that when the parties met for the final settlement conference (a day before the hearing), the division of the business and assets was agreed, as was custody and other provisions for the children - all very reasonable and rational.

    Now, a doctrine for trial lawyers is don't ask that one question too many; but if you do, don't make it open-ended. Since everything seemed resolved, one of the lawyers asked: "Are there any questions you want to ask ?" - which really meant "We've wrapped this up and John and I are going across the street for a beer."

    No beers that day because one of the spouses piped up with "What about the hammer ?" Turns out the wife had bought the husband an Eastwing framing hammer for a present. She wanted it back; the husband wanted to keep it. But, no one knew where it was.

    The net result was that the case went to hearing (since neither spouse would sign the settlement as to everything else); and the decision there was not surprising. The judge's decision was the same as the un-signed settlement agreement - which was after all quite reasonable.

    What about the hammer ? De minimus non curat lex - the law does not provide a remedy for minimal things (in that case, a non-locatable thing).

    That was my friend's last divorce case as a lawyer. Now, for his last divorce case as a judge. That was a knock-out, drag-out fight about everything. After a few days of trial, the parties got down to the last contested issue - the household dog. As you may or may not be aware, custody of the pet has become something to argue about.

    My friend said: "I don't do dogs." To which, the lawyers looked puzzled and asked for clarification. My friend simply explained that he would not hear evidence about the dog, nor address the dog's custody in his decision. Both lawyers objected violently - our clients have a legal right requiring you to decide. Maybe so, said my friend, but I don't do dogs; so, you can both appeal to the Court of Appeals or resolve it amongst yourselves - your choice.

    My friend retired a few days later (for reasons other than the dog) - so, I don't know how that story ended.

    I leave with these thoughts. There are certain cases that should not be brought. There are certain issues that cannot be resolved by formal processes.

  4. #24
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default Why don't we wrestle with the pig in the mud?

    Because the pig likes to get dirty.

    This was taught to me by a very wise Section Sergeant when I was a platoon leader.

  5. #25
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,021

    Default And, as to the pig ...

    the pig has to wallow in the muck because of body cooling needs, etc. We humans don't have that particular need - and there are a number of little bad things in the muck that are unhealthy for humans - who have different resistence levels to different bad things.

    But, pigs were fun to ride for us (the other us being a gal who now is a PhD prof at one of our local univs - who for some reason gets defensive when I bring up our pre-KG pig riding exploits in the river hollow below Shea's house).
    Last edited by jmm99; 04-19-2009 at 07:24 PM. Reason: can't spell

  6. #26
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default Such is the crux of the dilemma...

    Need versus Want that we continually strive. In Ken's words, evangelistic zeal. When I'm ready and composed, I'll explain it...

    It is neither right nor wrong, good nor bad...

    It just is.

    Just as Wilf is right in putting the pig out of his misery.

    In some sense, it all comes down to money and cost.

    The last administration tried their best to do it. Maybe they overeacted. So what?

    Obama is trying to react now. All we can do is hope.

    It is all going to cycle ebb and flow....

    Regardless, the sky is not falling down...All we have to do is consider the next direction and azimuth....

    Simply put, we have to determine how to communicate in ways universal that everyone can understand.
    Last edited by MikeF; 04-19-2009 at 07:57 PM.

  7. #27
    Council Member Bob's World's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,706

    Default

    Mike, you're going to give Ken an aneurysm with your little Zen journey here... :-)


    Personally, the sooner we stop waging the Cold War, the sooner we'll be able to not have to worry about the blow back from populaces who are weary of us still exerting that degree of control over them without there being a purpose any longer for exerting it. We've just done it for so long we have come to think of it as "normal." It isn't.

    Somewhere we drifted from "Making the world safe for Democracy" to making every nation a democracy. HUGE difference. When we get back to standing for our principles instead of slapping people with our values we will reslove much of the violence directed at us. These popluaces will then be able to focus their energy on their own governments. Once we become the enabler of good governance instead of the obstacle to good governance we will be square with our principles once again.

    I think we don't even hear ourselves any more. If some Muslim leader said he wanted to "make the world safe for Wahabism" I would say "Cool, that is right in line with our principle of Freedom of Religion." If the same leader said he "wants everyone to be Wahabist because Wahabist don't fight each other" I would say "Totally different, and now you are not only counter to our principle of freedom of religion but also our principle of self-determination."

    I yearn for an America once more dedicated to our founding principles. Good news is, while I don't think the new boss is getting this advice yet from his team, and is still holding onto a lot of bad post-Cold War Clinton and Bush perspectives, I believe he would understand and be open to the concept if presented.
    Robert C. Jones
    Intellectus Supra Scientia
    (Understanding is more important than Knowledge)

    "The modern COIN mindset is when one arrogantly goes to some foreign land and attempts to make those who live there a lesser version of one's self. The FID mindset is when one humbly goes to some foreign land and seeks first to understand, and then to help in some small way for those who live there to be the best version of their own self." Colonel Robert C. Jones, US Army Special Forces (Retired)

  8. #28
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default As do I...

    "I think you ought to know, dear brothers, about the time we went through in (SW) Asia. We were really crushed and overwhelmed and feared we would never live through it. We felt doomed to die and saw how powerless we were to help ourselves; but that was good, for then we put everything into the hands of the creator...and saved us from a terrible death." -Letter to Corinth

    I haven't lost my western Judeo-Christian beliefs...I just decided to question them. That's the mistake we made after the USSR fell and refused to stop fighting the Cold War....

    I simply have the ability to challenge the so called intellectuals. So, I challenge....Lest we fall in foolishness over neocon thought again.

    I'm still the same as I once was maybe more still.

    And yes, this will drive Ken insane

    Even though he's usually right..Such a paradox...

    If you disagree with me, just read Craig Mullaney's opinions. I know him as he is a classmate of mine. He has a good heart. He is a good man, but he is wrong. He spent too much time in school and not enough time on the line. Soon, he will probably be a civilian in DoD. Next, a senator. Right now, he talks about saving Afghanistan. I simply question what are we saving Afghanistan from? Itself?

    He is doing the same stupid stuff that Paul Wolfowitz once did, but people are listening to him because he is smart.

    Personally, I'm content to work on the village level to implement policy whether that be home or abroad. Rene Descartes spent a life forlorn trying to mathematically prove the existence of God.

    Thomas Paine wrote a book about all of this entitled Common Sense.

    Celebrate we will...Life is short but sweet for certain. -Dave Matthews

    v/r

    Mike
    Last edited by MikeF; 04-19-2009 at 09:22 PM.

  9. #29
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,021

    Default Rene Descartes ...

    was a lawyer by education and license (1616); and a soldier (1618-1622; and prob. 1623-1627), before his work in math (for which I know him best) and philosophy (for which I know least).

    A thought - focusing on a single object (or facet of a person's life) blurs the rest of the picture.

  10. #30
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default Again thanks

    For interdicting facts into my aside...

    I'll stick with my initial argument.

    Only knowing that I know nothing...

    More questions than answers...

    In the same regard, there is an intersection of the rivers even though it continually flows...

    You drive me to distraction. - Dave Matthews
    Last edited by MikeF; 04-19-2009 at 09:52 PM.

  11. #31
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default Nah, not even close -- I'm way too lazy to even get wrought, much less overwrought.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob's World View Post
    Mike, you're going to give Ken an aneurysm with your little Zen journey here... :-)
    Just been my observation that trying to herd cats is not a good plan; almost unbelievably people have this weird tendency to not interpret things the same way I do, so I found out the hard way it's better to lay out the facts or thoughts and let them decide, leading horses to water and all that...

    In the meantime, I read and I smile and nod but I'll wait for the main event before commenting on whatever that event turns out to be. Partly because I'm too old to bend over comfortably to pick up the bread crumbs being strewn to mark the trail. Far, far more importantly and to the point, I might pick up one juicy crumb and spend so much time admiring it that I lose track of the trail I was on and thus miss the destination. Even worse, I might decide a crumb was not a crumb -- I could come up with an alternative interpretation, if you will.

    This is not a perfect medium...

    This comment is interesting, Bob:
    "Somewhere we drifted from "Making the world safe for Democracy" to making every nation a democracy."
    in that we started trying to make every nation a democracy in the 90s, that's only the last two Administrations worth and this guy is backpedaling. Two out of 44 doesn't sound like anywhere near a total commitment to me...

    More importantly, this:
    "If some Muslim leader said he wanted to "make the world safe for Wahabism" I would say "Cool, that is right in line with our principle of Freedom of Religion." If the same leader said he "wants everyone to be Wahabist because Wahabist don't fight each other" I would say "Totally different, and now you are not only counter to our principle of freedom of religion but also our principle of self-determination."
    sounds dangerously close to selective enforcement. Wars have been started over less. I believe I understand what you mean but am unsure that's what you said -- it's sorta like Ol' Tom Ricks -- you may have a good message but be careful how you write it or it might get misconstrued...

  12. #32
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default Unfortunately, there is no main event...

    No decisive event in today's world. It is as simple as putting your foot in the stream..Once you do, once you gain some knowledge, the moment is lost forever as the river drifts and flows.

    Maybe it was always that way...Maybe we just failed to interpret....

    Maybe all we can do is negoitiate our own boat....and let others know the weather forecast...
    Last edited by MikeF; 04-19-2009 at 10:15 PM.

  13. #33
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default What is?

    What is the social contract that binds our marraiges, cities, and states?

    What is the tie that bind?

    What is love?

    How does it differ from the homeo-static norm that defines mental health in search of understanding of madness?

    These are the questions I considered...

    Some interesting comments from Jackie Chan regarding free society in China. Jackie Chan suggest that Chinese cannot accept democracy.

    http://www.facebook.com/ext/share.ph...u=3QOgk&ref=mf

    I wonder why...I observed the same thing in Iraq as Sunnis and some Shia admitted that they needed a Saddam to save them from themselves...

    I can only resolve my thoughts with this song as i have not the answers....

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eejRZ...eature=channel

    Is everyone an American in the making?
    Last edited by MikeF; 04-19-2009 at 10:48 PM.

  14. #34
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default Back to reality...

    Goesche is right...Expansion must be through expedition...I'll lead the first team...

    can anyone contradict that?

    I'll choose my team my way, and we'll venture west....

    All you have to do is say yes...It will be quite inexpensive....

    But, but, but...your risk assesments grow exponential....You can determine 60 ppt slides on why I should not venture, but you will not conduct one to say what we should do.

    Direction and distance, and I'll walk...

    v/r

    Mike
    Last edited by MikeF; 04-19-2009 at 11:59 PM.

  15. #35
    Moderator Steve Blair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob's World View Post
    I yearn for an America once more dedicated to our founding principles. Good news is, while I don't think the new boss is getting this advice yet from his team, and is still holding onto a lot of bad post-Cold War Clinton and Bush perspectives, I believe he would understand and be open to the concept if presented.
    I don't know that I'd go that far. He is, after all, a creation of 20th Century politics, which are about as far removed from the founding principles as you can get. People like to quote Ike's warning about the "military-industrial complex" while forgetting that his defense policies made that complex possible and even necessary for its execution. I tend to suspect that like most machine politicians, the new boss would be happy if foreign policy just went away for a time so he could mess with domestic issues. They're more amiable to his style and methods of control.
    "On the plains and mountains of the American West, the United States Army had once learned everything there was to learn about hit-and-run tactics and guerrilla warfare."
    T.R. Fehrenbach This Kind of War

  16. #36
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default Towards Better Policy: The social contract and the theory of games

    This is all that I will send out for awhile. I fear my carbon footprint has gotten too large, and I don't want to upset the Green Movement. I'm going to finish this product with the help of my thesis advisors. When it's complete, I'll publish it. I just want to make sure it's right. Thus, I have set the appriopriate environment and structures in place. Thanks again for all the support that y'all have given me over the last year.

    Towards Better Policy: The social contract and the theory of games

    Major Michael Few

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    Indeed, we live in exciting times. As democracies flourish, capitalism expands, cultures clash, new ideas emerge that may add to the betterment of society. Contrastingly, these times can be overwhelming and unnerving particularly when fear and greed outpace rhyme and reason. In those times, we fall off-center, and we fall prey to the worst of the human condition. Soldiers learn tried and true techniques to counter this fog and friction of life. When traversing through restricted terrain, when facing seemingly impassible obstacles, when the dark of night refuses to shed light, we stop, take a knee, listen to our surroundings, whisper amoungst each other lest the enemy hear us, pull out our map and compass, and determine our position. Then, we determine direction and distance to the next waypoint. We get back up and resume walking again.

    It is time to take a knee. I spent the last two years observing my surroundings, gathering information, and seeking certainty. I found my zen. Now, I will share it with you. I will introduce a model that has many applications ranging from seeking solutions to individual struggles to divorce to gangs to terrorism to the crisis of the nation-state if it proves to be correct, but in the end, it is simply a model not a law. That is the way it is with social sciences. Each theorem builds upon the last. In the end, it helped me regain my sanity as the great sadness attempted to overcome. So it works for me. Maybe it will work for you this I pray.

    Maybe it will simply allow you to sleep deeper than dreams and live life well. This I am certain. Personally, I believe life is stark if we simply take a moment to listen and comprehend. Life is simply resiliance. Resiliance is the American way. Our founders contended this debate years ago in the taverns of Philadelphia. In the end, they determined that we should strive for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. This paper is only another waypoint along that path.

    In the end, everything we do is simply a contract from marraige to citizenship to treaties to war. We must keep adjusting the contract in order to strive. I just found a way to model it mathematically.

Similar Threads

  1. Iraqis Adapt British Military Academy as Model
    By SWJED in forum The Whole News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-27-2006, 09:16 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •