Results 1 to 20 of 1120

Thread: Winning the War in Afghanistan

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Council Member Surferbeetle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,111

    Default 1949 Washington Treaty

    Second the attaboy for Eden..

    A datapoint to consider, as we kick this can around, from the NATO website

    The Parties to this Treaty reaffirm their faith in the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and their desire to live in peace with all peoples and all governments.

    They are determined to safeguard the freedom, common heritage and civilisation of their peoples, founded on the principles of democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law. They seek to promote stability and well-being in the North Atlantic area.

    They are resolved to unite their efforts for collective defence and for the preservation of peace and security. They therefore agree to this North Atlantic Treaty :
    WSJ Opinon piece by Josef Joffe; Obama's Popularity Doesn't Mean Much Abroad

    The point here is an old one, variously ascribed to Talleyrand, Palmerston or De Gaulle, about nations having everlasting interests rather than eternal friends or enemies. In today's language: interest beats affection any time. Mrs. Merkel surely knows how enthralled her country is with Mr. Obama. But that's not enough to place German soldiers in harm's way in Afghanistan, or to run up the national debt in a country that is traumatized by inflation.
    Last edited by Surferbeetle; 04-21-2009 at 07:03 PM. Reason: Added WSJ article
    Sapere Aude

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •