Results 1 to 20 of 360

Thread: Using drones: principles, tactics and results (amended title)

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,366

    Default A poor answer I fear

    Quote Originally Posted by William F. Owen View Post
    Makes you ask, as I often do, if something strategically dangerous, can be tactically useful.
    Personally, I think the idea of "tactical success" but "operational/strategic failure" is not an intellectually or practically defensible position.
    Wilf,

    I think those who have a short-term view would see drone attacks as a tactical success and meeting the imperative for taking action (shared by many actors). With their limited strategic horizon, or situational awareness, such actors do not consider the fuller picture and risks of operational or strategic failure.

    Staying with the Pakistani historical example; given the frustration with Pakistani in-action drone attacks appear an option and who say in 2006 would have objected to the impact on radicalising the FATA tribes? Striking the No.2 in AQ would be too tempting.

    All from my armchair faraway.

    davidbfpo
    Last edited by davidbfpo; 06-04-2009 at 10:12 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. War is War is Clausewitz
    By Michael C in forum Futurists & Theorists
    Replies: 421
    Last Post: 07-25-2012, 12:41 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •