Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 161

Thread: Honduras (catch all)

  1. #41
    Council Member marct's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by slapout9 View Post
    Video analysis of the situation by Real News Network.

    http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?o...0+17%3A03%3A19
    "Analysis"? Hmm, I would have said "pre-conceived theological Truthyness" myself . Did anyone else notice that a large amount of the video was provided by Al-Jezeera? I also noticed that the "commentator" (aka talking head) didn't bother to make any reference to the fact that referendums are disallowed within 6 months of an election.

    What's bothering me about a lot of this coverage is that nowhere yet have I seen anyone noting that Zelaya was trying to build a Chavez-style dictatorship.
    Sic Bisquitus Disintegrat...
    Marc W.D. Tyrrell, Ph.D.
    Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies,
    Senior Research Fellow,
    The Canadian Centre for Intelligence and Security Studies, NPSIA
    Carleton University
    http://marctyrrell.com/

  2. #42
    Council Member J Wolfsberger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    806

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by marct View Post
    What's bothering me about a lot of this coverage is that nowhere yet have I seen anyone noting that Zelaya was trying to build a Chavez-style dictatorship.
    Marc, I think you may be confusing "media coverage" with "news." What's important to the media is that a Leftist lost power. The facts are minor details of no particular significance.

    What I would like to know is whether there's any confirmation of the assertion in the NY Post that Chavez has agents on the ground. Would he be likely to start/support an insurgency/revolution?
    John Wolfsberger, Jr.

    An unruffled person with some useful skills.

  3. #43
    Council Member AnalyticType's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    66

    Default I'm wondering

    how the video jives with truth on the ground now, several days afterward. Specifically, Prof Salas referred to Zelaya's referrendum as a 'survey', giving it a very different (and far more favorable) connotation. He stated that an unknown number of Legislators had been kidnapped, but I have not seen indications of that elsewhere (yet.) He cited the electricity having been cut off deliberately to create fear among the populace, as well as declaration of 'martial law' for the same purpose. I have not seen evidence of those allegations in La Prensa, though in full disclosure my spanish is rusty (making the translation perhaps less than accurate) and I don't have a handle on the direction of that publication's likely bias.

    Having just spent four years living on campus at a very 'liberal' institution of higher education, and having many profs/administrators/students of vocally partisan viewpoints surrounding me, I recognise fervent advocacy coming from the "analyst" Professor Miguel Salas... not balanced analysis. Despite that, the video presented it's 'evidence' from a very finite viewpoint (assuming that all the video bits are actually from Honduras on Sunday), so I'm wondering whether any of the allegations made by Prof Salas from that time frame remain the situation now; or has stability and popular understanding of the full situation occurred? Again, that's the impression I got from my rusty reading of La Prensa.

    And, as Marc mentioned, video courtesy of al-Jazeera?? Just a bit odd. I perceive a significant amount of cherry-picking in the information presented in the video.

    J Wolfsberger, it's likely that the answer to your question is "yes."

    I'm thinkin' a little structured ACH exercise is in order. (This'll be good practice for me!) I'll dig into it and post findings later today.

    Quote Originally Posted by slapout9 View Post
    Video analysis of the situation by Real News Network.

    http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?o...0+17%3A03%3A19
    "At least we're getting the kind of experience we need for the next war." -- Allen Dulles

    A work of art worth drooling over: http://www.maxton.com/intimidator1/i...r1_page4.shtml

  4. #44
    Council Member marct's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Hi JW,

    Quote Originally Posted by J Wolfsberger View Post
    Marc, I think you may be confusing "media coverage" with "news." What's important to the media is that a Leftist lost power. The facts are minor details of no particular significance.
    As Stan would say, that's the romantic in me . 'sides that, it would probably be more accurate (if that means anything ) to state that "What's important is that a demagogue using broadly Marxian rhetoric to establish personal rule under the "one Man - One Vote" rule (and he's the one man with the one vote) got turfed by the supreme court, the congress and the military."

    Quote Originally Posted by J Wolfsberger View Post
    What I would like to know is whether there's any confirmation of the assertion in the NY Post that Chavez has agents on the ground. Would he be likely to start/support an insurgency/revolution?
    Now that is an interesting question. Honestly, i wouldn't be surprised if he did. You know, if Aristophanes was alive today, he would be having a field day - can we say "Brakakax, koax, koax"?
    Sic Bisquitus Disintegrat...
    Marc W.D. Tyrrell, Ph.D.
    Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies,
    Senior Research Fellow,
    The Canadian Centre for Intelligence and Security Studies, NPSIA
    Carleton University
    http://marctyrrell.com/

  5. #45
    Council Member J Wolfsberger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    806

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by marct View Post
    ... it would probably be more accurate (if that means anything ) to state that "What's important is that a demagogue using broadly Marxian rhetoric to establish personal rule under the "one Man - One Vote" rule (and he's the one man with the one vote) got turfed by the supreme court, the congress and the military."
    Well THERE'S my problem. As a simple minded engineering type I didn't realize THAT'S what was happening!
    John Wolfsberger, Jr.

    An unruffled person with some useful skills.

  6. #46
    Council Member marct's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by J Wolfsberger View Post
    Well THERE'S my problem. As a simple minded engineering type I didn't realize THAT'S what was happening!
    !!!!!!!
    Sic Bisquitus Disintegrat...
    Marc W.D. Tyrrell, Ph.D.
    Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies,
    Senior Research Fellow,
    The Canadian Centre for Intelligence and Security Studies, NPSIA
    Carleton University
    http://marctyrrell.com/

  7. #47
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default I should have known better than to

    Quote Originally Posted by marct View Post
    ...can we say "Brakakax, koax, koax"?
    Google those words individually...

  8. #48
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Rancho La Espada, Blanchard, OK
    Posts
    1,065

    Default I was wondering why

    the SG of the OAS, Jose Miguel Insulza, was so adamant in this crisis. Insulza is a Chilean who was exiled as a result of the Pinochet coup in 1973. It was obviously a searing and formative experience for him. Moreover, there are enough analogous factors in the Honduras scenario to offer an explanation for his position.

    Cheers

    JohnT

  9. #49
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Rocky Mtn Empire
    Posts
    473

    Default

    My read of the situation is somewhat different than many of the posts. Deep down, I think that many of the main external players, with the exception of the "Bolivarians" and the outright communists, want Zelaya gone, but through more judicial processes than having the army spirit him out of the country. The internal players (SC & cong), on the other hand, may be fearful of the street violence Z might be able to generate during that process.

    Almost everybody wants to prevent the return of the ubiquitous military coups of the 50s-80s.

  10. #50
    Council Member Ron Humphrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    1,099

    Question One thing I remember thinking when

    Chavez was up to his Mr friendly antics at the UN a year or so ago was how would someone like him choose to pull kind of a reverse history in Latin America/ blended with a Castroesque control.

    This

    Take it turn it around and insert Chavez??

    Probably way off but its one possible way of looking at it.
    (Or do I get my own conspiracy thread)
    Any man can destroy that which is around him, The rare man is he who can find beauty even in the darkest hours

    Cogitationis poenam nemo patitur

  11. #51
    Council Member slapout9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,818

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by marct View Post
    "Analysis"? Hmm, I would have said "pre-conceived theological Truthyness" myself . Did anyone else notice that a large amount of the video was provided by Al-Jezeera? I also noticed that the "commentator" (aka talking head) didn't bother to make any reference to the fact that referendums are disallowed within 6 months of an election.

    What's bothering me about a lot of this coverage is that nowhere yet have I seen anyone noting that Zelaya was trying to build a Chavez-style dictatorship.
    Happy Canada Day Marct here is some video coverage for you!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CykFEFwP2IU
    Last edited by slapout9; 07-02-2009 at 01:03 AM. Reason: fix stuff

  12. #52
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Rancho La Espada, Blanchard, OK
    Posts
    1,065

    Default Oe

    I think your analysis is spot on. What concerns me is the unwillingness of the external players - non-Bolivarian - to look at the facts on the ground. They have all created a myth that this was a coup, which if the facts are as reported it was not. Indeed, it was a constitutionally sanctioned action carried out somewhat more crudely than was really necessary - but constitutional nonetheless.

    Marct and all other Canadians here, I join in wishing y'all a Happy Canada Day.

    Cheers

    JohnT

  13. #53
    Council Member slapout9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,818

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Old Eagle View Post
    My read of the situation is somewhat different than many of the posts. Deep down, I think that many of the main external players, with the exception of the "Bolivarians" and the outright communists, want Zelaya gone, but through more judicial processes than having the army spirit him out of the country. The internal players (SC & cong), on the other hand, may be fearful of the street violence Z might be able to generate during that process.

    Almost everybody wants to prevent the return of the ubiquitous military coups of the 50s-80s.

    You got my vote.

  14. #54
    Council Member AnalyticType's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    66

    Default Interesting ACH exercise

    I meant to post this hours ago, but well, life happens....

    BLUF: Based upon the information gathered, and assuming that all of the information that has been discussed is valid, it is highly unlikely that the ouster of Presidente Zelaya was an illegal action/coup. Further, it is highly likely that the actions taken by the Honduran Legislature, Supreme Court, and military, were triggered by a significant trend of activities by Zelaya to consolidate power and guarantee his continued presidency beyond the constitutionally set limit.

    Utilising Dick Heuer's ACH software, I evaluated 36 pieces of evidence/information against two sets of mutually exclusive hypotheses:

    1) The actions of the Honduran government were legal; or The actions of the Honduran government were an illegal coup.
    2) Zelaya was not acting in his own self-interest; or Zelaya was laying the groundwork for "president-for-life" conditions to his benefit

    The list of evidence/information which I evaluated against these four theses, with a screenshot example of how the ACH matrix was constructed, and a simple graph with statistical results, is attached to this post. Keep in mind that my goal was not to prove any theory, but rather to disprove all of the theories. The results of the ACH matrix are not absolute, but they are structured and significantly less prone to bias.

    BTW, I'm prolly preachin' to the choir for quite a few here...humor me? My intent is merely to introduce a little structured analysis rather than emotion- or mind-set-based determinations.
    Attached Files Attached Files
    "At least we're getting the kind of experience we need for the next war." -- Allen Dulles

    A work of art worth drooling over: http://www.maxton.com/intimidator1/i...r1_page4.shtml

  15. #55
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Rancho La Espada, Blanchard, OK
    Posts
    1,065

    Default Well done, AT!

    Nice job putting that together.

    Questions:
    1. Where do you find the ACH softwear?
    2. Is it available w/o charge ie free?
    3.Where does one find a good and detailed description of what it does?

    So much for the practical questions. Now for something methodologically substantive - How did you arrive at your coding for credibility and relevance? While I generally agreed with you there were a couple (1 - 3) relevances that I questioned and a few more (3 - 5) credibilities that I questioned. In a similar vein, was Low not an option? And if it was, why did you not choose it in any case (I really thought there were a couple of low creds and 1 low relevance)?

    Again, ya done good!!!!!

    Cheers

    JohnT

  16. #56
    Council Member J Wolfsberger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    806

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John T. Fishel View Post
    Nice job putting that together.

    Questions:
    1. Where do you find the ACH softwear?
    2. Is it available w/o charge ie free?
    3.Where does one find a good and detailed description of what it does?

    So much for the practical questions. Now for something methodologically substantive - How did you arrive at your coding for credibility and relevance? While I generally agreed with you there were a couple (1 - 3) relevances that I questioned and a few more (3 - 5) credibilities that I questioned. In a similar vein, was Low not an option? And if it was, why did you not choose it in any case (I really thought there were a couple of low creds and 1 low relevance)?

    Again, ya done good!!!!!

    Cheers

    JohnT
    I'll second that.

    John, I'm intrigued by the tool as well. Here's a start: Analysis of Competing Hypotheses.

    Here's one tool: ACH2.0.3
    John Wolfsberger, Jr.

    An unruffled person with some useful skills.

  17. #57
    Council Member marct's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    3,682

    Thumbs up

    Nice job, AT!

    JW, thanks for the links - I'm going to try playing with the software and see how well it operates.
    Sic Bisquitus Disintegrat...
    Marc W.D. Tyrrell, Ph.D.
    Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies,
    Senior Research Fellow,
    The Canadian Centre for Intelligence and Security Studies, NPSIA
    Carleton University
    http://marctyrrell.com/

  18. #58
    Council Member AnalyticType's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    66

    Wink Aawww man!

    You beat me to it!

    That's precisely the software I used. I have another one called DecisionWarning which has more graphing tools once you've completed the matrix, but ACH from PARC is better explained and easier to use.

    JTF, to answer your third question, the ACH software from PARC (Richards Heuer) has a very detailed tutorial which can be utilized on-screen or downloaded and printed out. As I recall, it prints out to about 50 pages, give or take.

    Regarding the subjective elements (credibility and relevance), the options are Low, Medium and High. For credibility of the information, if I had a piece of information that was obtained from a highly credible source, ie the State Department website, OR if I confirmed more than two disparate but credible sources, I rated it High. I used Medium for data which I found in two locations, where one or both sources were less than sterling. And Low I used on a couple items, but then found confirming information elsewhere and changed them to Medium.

    Regarding relevance, the same options are available. I was evaluating two different sets of competing hypotheses which were related to each other but not necessarily 'linked' to each other. So I used High relevance for information which strongly was applicable to both sets of hypotheses, and Medium relevance for information which may be peripheral for one set but cogent for the other.

    And yes, it is subjective. While I know a fair amount about Latin American history, culture and politics, I have not been there and am not an area expert. Someone who spent a great deal of time there (via State, DoD or CIA, etc) likely would rate relevance or credibility differently than I, in some instances.



    Quote Originally Posted by J Wolfsberger View Post
    I'll second that.

    John, I'm intrigued by the tool as well. Here's a start: Analysis of Competing Hypotheses.

    Here's one tool: ACH2.0.3
    Last edited by AnalyticType; 07-02-2009 at 01:32 PM. Reason: ...fixing typos...
    "At least we're getting the kind of experience we need for the next war." -- Allen Dulles

    A work of art worth drooling over: http://www.maxton.com/intimidator1/i...r1_page4.shtml

  19. #59
    Council Member marct's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by slapout9 View Post
    Happy Canada Day Marct here is some video coverage for you!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CykFEFwP2IU
    What can I say but Oi Vey?!?!?

    Well, 'twas a fun day but doesn't come close to 1979 !!!!
    Sic Bisquitus Disintegrat...
    Marc W.D. Tyrrell, Ph.D.
    Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies,
    Senior Research Fellow,
    The Canadian Centre for Intelligence and Security Studies, NPSIA
    Carleton University
    http://marctyrrell.com/

  20. #60
    Council Member J Wolfsberger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    806

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AnalyticType View Post
    You beat me to it!

    That's precisely the software I used. I have another one called DecisionWarning which has more graphing tools once you've completed the matrix, but ACH from PARC is better explained and easier to use.

    JTF, to answer your third question, the ACH software from PARC (Richards Heuer) has a very detailed tutorial which can be utilized on-screen or downloaded and printed out. As I recall, it prints out to about 50 pages, give or take.

    Regarding the subjective elements (credibility and relevance), the options are Low, Medium and High. For credibility of the information, if I had a piece of information that was obtained from a highly credible source, ie the State Department website, OR if I confirmed more than two disparate but credible sources, I rated it High. I used Medium for data which I found in two locations, where one or both sources were less than sterling. And Low I used on a couple items, but then found confirming information elsewhere and changed them to Medium.

    Regarding relevance, the same options are available. I was evaluating two different sets of competing hypotheses which were related to each other but not necessarily 'linked' to each other. So I used High relevance for information which strongly was applicable to both sets of hypotheses, and Medium relevance for information which may be peripheral for one set but cogent for the other.

    And yes, it is subjective. While I know a fair amount about Latin American history, culture and politics, I have not been there and am not an area expert. Someone who spent a great deal of time there (via State, DoD or CIA, etc) likely would rate relevance or credibility differently than I, in some instances.
    This methodology is similar to the Delphi Method. One way to approach the rating is to have a small panel of independent reviewers, then "average" their evaluations. Depending on how you want to look at it, you're either averaging the subjectivity, or averaging it out. I've used this approach in areas such as formal risk assessments for R&D programs with pretty good results.

    AT, I owe you a beer if we ever run into each other. I've been looking for a package to do this for some time now.
    John Wolfsberger, Jr.

    An unruffled person with some useful skills.

Similar Threads

  1. UK military problems & policies
    By SWJED in forum Europe
    Replies: 267
    Last Post: 01-15-2019, 05:09 PM
  2. Sierra Leone (catch all)
    By Tom Odom in forum Africa
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-01-2017, 12:19 PM
  3. Biometrics (catch all)
    By Lupo49 in forum Equipment & Capabilities
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-10-2016, 01:11 PM
  4. How does an analyst catch a terrorist?
    By davidbfpo in forum Intelligence
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-17-2015, 02:46 AM
  5. Don't Send a Lion to Catch a Mouse
    By SWJED in forum Futurists & Theorists
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 03-15-2007, 11:46 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •