Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: Exum on NPR

  1. #21
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default That's quite astute, I think.

    Quote Originally Posted by TheCurmudgeon View Post
    ... What I think I really wanted to say is that using western ideals as the metric of success in a society where the mindset is still quasi-medieval is probably the wrong way to go. Elections aren’t going to magically create legitimacy. Providing for the needs of the people in a way the people understand and at a level they really want (and is sustainable), even where that need seems barbaric, may be what is required to win over the population.
    Though I suggest you will not win them over -- what you will do is give them reason not to be won over by others. Or to not seem so -- sometime in that area, it's hard to tell. Either way, you're likely to be ahead of the opposition. Try to do it with western norms and you will not be ahead...
    Problem is that politically, that is unpalatable.
    Shouldn't be, though I admit reality often is. Barbaric is in the eye of and all that. The ME is not the US or Europe and they are not going to change their rules until they decide they wish to do so and right now most are reasonably happy with the way they do things. Western thought has difficulty accepting that for some reason.

  2. #22
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rex Brynen View Post
    Although what is interesting about Iraq is the extent to which there wasn't large-scale Shi'ite violence directed against Sunnis until after the February 2006 al-Askari Mosque bombing. Indeed, through 2003-2006 both Kurdish and Shiite orientations towards the Sunni minority were remarkably restrained, despite both past history and ongoing AQI violence against Shi'ites in particular.
    Correct. I think that when the final history of the Iraq war is written, 2003-2005 will be described as different insurgent groups shifting between Mao's Phase 0, 1, and limited 2. Initially, when we took down Baghdad, we used speed and mass to conduct regime change. As we failed to secure and transition into a proper occupation, a security gap was realized. Thus, different groups began to accumulate people, guns, and money. Limited attacks and coersion started dividing a once somewhat homogenous populace
    into ethnic and sectarian lines. When Zarqawi hit the scene with the Samarra Mosque bombing, the situation escalated into a Mao Phase 3 or civil war.

    Thoughts?

    v/r

    Mike

Similar Threads

  1. Exum vs. Ricks vs. Gentile vs. Prine
    By Cavguy in forum Media, Information & Cyber Warriors
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 07-05-2009, 01:02 PM
  2. Replies: 66
    Last Post: 01-27-2009, 07:38 PM
  3. DoD vs. State Dept on Reviving Iraqi Industry
    By tequila in forum US Policy, Interest, and Endgame
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-27-2008, 09:28 PM
  4. COL Sean McFarland NPR interview
    By tequila in forum The Information War
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-21-2007, 03:34 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •