Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: U.S. Troops Watch As Iraqi Soldiers Kill Iranian Exiles

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default U.S. Troops Watch As Iraqi Soldiers Kill Iranian Exiles

    U.S. troops watch as Iraqi soldiers kill Iranian exiles
    Kim Gabel
    Associated Press

    The women formed a human chain while the men chanted, confronting Iraqi troops moving into their compound. Gunfire rang out, and the soldiers waded in with batons, wooden bats and automatic weapons.

    By the end, officials said, 11 Iranian exiles were dead - shot, beaten or run over by military vehicles.

    Throughout the July 28 confrontation, American soldiers who once protected the Iranian opposition group stood by. According to U.S. officials, they had no legal authority to intervene. One video taken by the exiles even shows soldiers get into a white sport utility vehicle and roll up their windows as the bloodied men plead for help.

    The deadly melee at Camp Ashraf, the base of the People's Mujahedeen Organization of Iran, provides a glaring example of what can go wrong as the U.S. military scales back and the Shiite-led Iraqi government flexes its muscles.
    Not sure what to think about this report. Thoughts?

    v/r

    Mike

  2. #2
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,021

    Default Iraqis will be Iraqis ....

    and Iraqi governance will be Iraqi governance - not US governance.

    It is now their show and the SOFA spells out their sovereignty. The Iraqis will take a different view of the Geneva Conventions (at a minimum, Common Article 3 applies and, for civilians, GC IV) than the US, the UK or Germany.

    Regards

    Mike

  3. #3
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jmm99 View Post
    and Iraqi governance will be Iraqi governance - not US governance.

    It is now their show and the SOFA spells out their sovereignty. The Iraqis will take a different view of the Geneva Conventions (at a minimum, Common Article 3 applies and, for civilians, GC IV) than the US, the UK or Germany.
    Hi Mike.

    That's probably the best way to put it. Ashraf has long been a point of contention. Thankfully, as bad as that incident was, it was only 11 killed. It could have been much worse. Hopefully, the military and political advisors will be able to influence the situation in the upcoming months towards a better outcome and hopefully a sustained resolution.

    Doesn't make it easy though. I would not want to have to stand around and not be able to take any action (another example of my own GPF indoctrination and mentality that I alluded to with Bob's World the other day).

    v/r

    Mike

  4. #4
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    69

    Default Google up Mujahedeen e Khalq...

    and you will know why a shiite (and probably pro Iranian) iraqi govt does everything to get rid of them.

    OTOH as stalwart opponents of the religious iranian regime they were mostly pro US. Probably until know.
    Nihil sub sole novum.

  5. #5
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,021

    Default Nothing wrong with

    your "GPF indoctrination and mentality". There are just situations into which GPF should not be put. As you correctly state, the task is one for military and political advisors to handle - with more emphasis on the political.

    Iraq will present many political questions in the upcoming months - some of them could be very serious (hopefully not).

  6. #6
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default My question is why, knowing what was going to happen

    any US Troops were even in the vicinity? I agree that it is now Iraqi business and not ours so perhaps the troops were left in a witness mode in an effort to get the Iraqis to play nice. If so that was dumb, as the Iraqis were more likely to increase rather than decrease their use of force just to get one on the Mrekai. Regardless of whether it was a local or a DC decision it wasn't smart and wasn't fair to the troops.

    Bottling up the MeK initially made sense but we had six years to figure out that they were not a bargaining chip with Iran, they were not going to overthrow the Mullahs and they were going to be a problem. We've had over a year to figure out that the Iraqis were not going to be nice..

  7. #7
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    1,602

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken White View Post
    Bottling up the MeK initially made sense but we had six years to figure out that they were not a bargaining chip with Iran, they were not going to overthrow the Mullahs and they were going to be a problem. We've had over a year to figure out that the Iraqis were not going to be nice..
    Absolutely.. it seemed at times as if Washington was just hoping that the problem would somehow magically resolve itself (although I do recognize that they were caught between some sympathy for the MeK in some quarters in DC, and no easy solutions on the Iraqi end).
    They mostly come at night. Mostly.


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •