To those who doubt, I challenge you to listen to the 15 minute audio interview with the story's author, which includes pictures.
If I had watched men die for want of needed support in contact, I would be fuming mad too. Sh*t happens in war, I know that well, but this one apparently didn't have to.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/75300.html
(Sorry, can't embed the video from McClatchy's website)
On the ROE thread I mentioned why I supported GEN McCrystal's new rules, which I still do. I oppose those who can't understand when rules need to be interpreted or violated to do the right thing.
It goes back to my question as to why johnny (joe) can't think and what I posted in that thread as to what I would do if confronted with such a decision. I said:
The task force supporting obviously didn't feel they had that flexibility, or were unwilling to use it. Sad.And then there is the Cavguy solution. If you're on the ground, and the right and obvious thing to do is staring you in the face, just do it, and take the consequences. That's actually what we did that day of the video. My army experiences tell me well considered violations of rules/guidance is generally underwritten by most commanders, especially if conditions warrant.
Niel
Bookmarks