The reason Appreciative Inquiry is hard to grasp is that most of us are used to taking a problem-solution approach to thinking about the future. It's not really that complicated, and I agree the capstone shouldn't really be that complicated of a document. A Rifle Platoon should be able to read it and "get it." Good point. That's why I suggested getting a core group representative of the Army from all ranks, and then asking them questions about when and how they are at their best doing their jobs, then grounding the future propositions in those examples. It's not "fancy."
Bookmarks