Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 83

Thread: Light Infantry and Afghanistan

  1. #61
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    3,902

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fuchs View Post
    This must not be his fault or the media's at all.
    I've encountered the worst misinformations about military hardware among both journalists and soldiers. Others tend to shut up unless they played a videogame that mentioned something related.
    For the little it is worth I am somewhat disappointed at your lack of intuition.

    Would you agree that questions can be asked with at least two purposes in mind. One to learn something from the answer and second to see if the person asked the question knows what the hell HE is talking about.

    I have in the short while I have been here received some very 'illuminating' answers to some very basic questions.

  2. #62
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JMA View Post
    For the little it is worth I am somewhat disappointed at your lack of intuition.

    Would you agree that questions can be asked with at least two purposes in mind. One to learn something from the answer and second to see if the person asked the question knows what the hell HE is talking about.

    I have in the short while I have been here received some very 'illuminating' answers to some very basic questions.
    Trust me when I admit that I underestimate the competence of others more often than I overestimate it.
    Nobody can guess correctly all the time.

  3. #63
    Council Member Uboat509's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    681

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JMA View Post
    Oh dear. It seems that when confronted with the facts you would rather throw the manual out the window than accept that you were out on the definition. Sad.

    ...oh, and the personal stuff Ken, its water off a ducks back.
    Which "facts" did you confront him with? A single source media report? Really? That's what you've got to "confront" a man with 20+ years and two wars worth of experience? Arrogance and disrespect aren't helping you make your point.
    “Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.”

    Terry Pratchett

  4. #64
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default Nah. He confronted me with the Book. I've had lost

    Lieutenants confronting me with books for over 50 years.

    Generally without thinking about what the books say and what really happens on the ground. Or realizing they're only embarrassing themselves.

  5. #65
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    3,902

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Uboat509 View Post
    Which "facts" did you confront him with? A single source media report? Really? That's what you've got to "confront" a man with 20+ years and two wars worth of experience? Arrogance and disrespect aren't helping you make your point.
    Excuse me.

    This matter is purely in relation to what is a "hasty ambush". There is nothing in that article to support his position and when the definition further proved him to be in error he just threw the manual out the window.

    But... that article is an absolute gem of information about the quality of that particular units soldiering. Now you can respond in two ways. Blame everything on the reporter or say, hey, we need to look a little deeper into this matter, we have some work to do.

  6. #66
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    3,902

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken White View Post
    Lieutenants confronting me with books for over 50 years.

    Generally without thinking about what the books say and what really happens on the ground. Or realizing they're only embarrassing themselves.
    Perhaps you were a lieutenant once yourself. I remember the lessons I learned as a lieutenant as much as I did later.

    Ken, I am starting to find this hilarious. You make a minor error over a definition and then just can't find it in you to say oops, yes I slipped up there.

  7. #67
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JMA View Post
    Excuse me.

    This matter is purely in relation to what is a "hasty ambush". There is nothing in that article to support his position and when the definition further proved him to be in error he just threw the manual out the window.

    But... that article is an absolute gem of information about the quality of that particular units soldiering. Now you can respond in two ways. Blame everything on the reporter or say, hey, we need to look a little deeper into this matter, we have some work to do.
    Naw, it's about as prolific as a commentator telling a quarterback that he just needs to score more touchdowns in order to win the game.

  8. #68
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    3,902

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MikeF View Post
    Naw, it's about as prolific as a commentator telling a quarterback that he just needs to score more touchdowns in order to win the game.
    Prolific?

  9. #69
    Council Member Infanteer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    347

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JMA View Post
    All the information I have from different sources informs me that very few if any night ops are being carried out by non special forces units.
    Wrong.

  10. #70
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JMA View Post
    Prolific?
    Prolific- highly productive. Producing ideas or works frequently in large quantities.

    Synonyms- Productive, creative, inexhaustible, fertile, fruitful

    Antonyms- unproductive

  11. #71
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    3,902

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Infanteer View Post
    Wrong.
    I would be happy if someone could set me straight on this point. No ones seems able to do so.

  12. #72
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    3,902

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MikeF View Post
    Prolific- highly productive. Producing ideas or works frequently in large quantities.

    Synonyms- Productive, creative, inexhaustible, fertile, fruitful

    Antonyms- unproductive
    Yes I know that but was hoping you used it incorrectly in that analogy. Care to make a translation into simple English please?

  13. #73
    Moderator Steve Blair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JMA View Post
    Yes I know that but was hoping you used it incorrectly in that analogy. Care to make a translation into simple English please?
    Pretty simple: stating the obvious. Unless Mike has some deeper connotations in mind?
    "On the plains and mountains of the American West, the United States Army had once learned everything there was to learn about hit-and-run tactics and guerrilla warfare."
    T.R. Fehrenbach This Kind of War

  14. #74
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default Yes, you can engender that. You are that...

    Quote Originally Posted by JMA View Post
    Ken, I am starting to find this hilarious. You make a minor error over a definition and then just can't find it in you to say oops, yes I slipped up there.
    I cheerfully admit errors; I ordinarily do not acknowledge pedantic corrections and two cent 'gotcha' as errors if they are insignificant -- and this one is all that...
    Perhaps you were a lieutenant once yourself. I remember the lessons I learned as a lieutenant as much as I did later.
    Er, no, I was never a Lieutenant. I always worked for a living.

    Trained a bunch, the majority who went to be successful Colonels and above. Then I worked for the Army as a civilian trainer, 45 years all told; that's called masochism.

  15. #75
    Moderator Steve Blair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    Ok, folks. Let's all take a deep breath, have some more coffee (or whatever your beverage of choice is for your current time zone), and cut back on the snarkiness (bitchiness and sniping for those who don't often use the term). There's intelligent discussion to be had here if we take a moment to find it again.

    Thanks.
    "On the plains and mountains of the American West, the United States Army had once learned everything there was to learn about hit-and-run tactics and guerrilla warfare."
    T.R. Fehrenbach This Kind of War

  16. #76
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default No one is willing to post any Operational Security lapses

    Quote Originally Posted by JMA View Post
    I would be happy if someone could set me straight on this point. No ones seems able to do so.
    here to entertain you. You worry about casualties but ask for details that are available on the internet to a great extent but that need not be collected to give someone lurking on this board some information that might aid the bad guys.

    While there's little real and current information due to OpSec concerns, there's adequate information on the net to produce a far better picture than you seem to have but no one is going to do your research for you, either.

    ADDENDUM: One of the Posting Rules contained in the FAQ (LINK) states:

    "This is a public forum. You agree that you will not discuss details of current operations that could compromise or disadvantage lawful combatants, and you will not discuss classified material." The large number of currently serving and former military people posting her perhaps mean excessive caution in that regard but that's the way it is.
    Last edited by Ken White; 04-27-2010 at 02:29 PM. Reason: Remove offensive line, Addnedum

  17. #77
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default Sorry, Steve. I missed your last post. Had I not

    I'd have left off my last line above.

    ADDED: Removed it, forgot the edit function...
    Last edited by Ken White; 04-27-2010 at 02:21 PM. Reason: Addendum

  18. #78
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    3,902

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Blair View Post
    Pretty simple: stating the obvious. Unless Mike has some deeper connotations in mind?
    The word quarterback is not in the vocabulary out here in the colonies.

  19. #79
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    3,902

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken White View Post
    I cheerfully admit errors; I ordinarily do not acknowledge pedantic corrections and two cent 'gotcha' as errors if they are insignificant -- and this one is all that...Er, no, I was never a Lieutenant. I always worked for a living.

    Trained a bunch, the majority who went to be successful Colonels and above. Then I worked for the Army as a civilian trainer, 45 years all told; that's called masochism.
    OK gotcha... did you ever get to do any operational para jumps?

  20. #80
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    3,902

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken White View Post
    here to entertain you. You worry about casualties but ask for details that are available on the internet to a great extent but that need not be collected to give someone lurking on this board some information that might aid the bad guys.

    While there's little real and current information due to OpSec concerns, there's adequate information on the net to produce a far better picture than you seem to have but no one is going to do your research for you, either.

    ADDENDUM: One of the Posting Rules contained in the FAQ (LINK) states:

    "This is a public forum. You agree that you will not discuss details of current operations that could compromise or disadvantage lawful combatants, and you will not discuss classified material." The large number of currently serving and former military people posting her perhaps mean excessive caution in that regard but that's the way it is.
    There is absolutely nothing being said here which may compromise opsec. The information that I have which may do so would never be posted to a public forum such as this.

    As far as research goes. I can do my own and seeing how others reply to my questions sometimes I get a cut and paste from some other source. Meaning I don't like to get tied down in discussions with 5-min goggle experts.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •