Results 1 to 20 of 42

Thread: Delivering Cultural Competence

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member Commando Spirit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nichols View Post
    The major issue is that there is no doctrine so the training being done on the small unit level stays at the small unit level.

    When the culture specialist are highered to conduct training, the KSAs play into the highering process. Ultimately, because there isn't a clear defined doctrine the instructor usually is highered on a subjective basis.
    I'm with Jennifer on this one; this is how doctrine should be produced. We identify a capability gap, develop local training solutions (as in your small unit trg) then capture that trg and the lessons learnt; which in tern identifies best practice, and this is subsequently written down as draft doctrine. Following the usual rigmarole of 2* and 1* approval it is then published.

    All that noted, the cultural and language arena is a flexible one and so probably not best served by the doctrine slaves out there. How many of us read COIN manuals/papers and agree with them only to go back after another 5 yrs or so to find that we have done a complete U turn?

    The Trg solution here, to my simple mind, needs to be one that is generic enough to be fit for purpose in any theatre but can also have modules of focussed trg interventions that are theatre specific - Afghanistan for example.
    Commando Spirit:
    Courage, Determination, Unselfishness, and Cheerfulness in the face of adversity

  2. #2
    Council Member nichols's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Stafford Virginia
    Posts
    290

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Commando Spirit View Post
    We identify a capability gap, develop local training solutions (as in your small unit trg) then capture that trg and the lessons learnt; which in tern identifies best practice, and this is subsequently written down as draft doctrine. Following the usual rigmarole of 2* and 1* approval it is then published.
    Something that is missing is that once a capability gap has been identified, a requirement has to be identified and written. Going from gap to training solution will keep us in the current loop of just in time training that doesn't answer the requirement that was never identified in the first place.

    'Things' can be built to a requirement, operational & maintenance funds can be sourced to a requirement that will last longer than a just in time solution.

Similar Threads

  1. Language and Cultural Awareness Transformation
    By Jedburgh in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 09-17-2008, 09:16 PM
  2. U.S. Wants Cultural Savvy Troops
    By SWJED in forum Government Agencies & Officials
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-11-2006, 10:02 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •