I am working on a 2 page paper on 'The Future of Logistics?' I am interested in your opinions on the topic and am looking for any material on this subject. Thank you in advance for your comments.
The Future of Logistics
I am working on a 2 page paper on 'The Future of Logistics?' I am interested in your opinions on the topic and am looking for any material on this subject. Thank you in advance for your comments.
Background
This new member has added some bio details on his profile, which explain his background and why he has made this request (full-time NG). So if curious check there.
davidbfpo
Two pages? You need to be a master of compression.
I envisaged about 15 pages when I thought about such a thing.
Is your topic of general nature or about the near-term future in your specific service/nation?
Yes, only two pages on the ‘Future of the Logistics Corps’. It’s a Professional Development paper required by the school house I'm reporting to next week. I figured that a Request for Info here would get a hit or two. So far so good.Originally Posted by Fuchs
Please keep your ideas coming; I consider it valuable and constructive. Thank you in advance for your assistance!
In Army terms, whether the consolidation of MOSs and specialties into the "multifunctional logistician" concepts can actually work, or are critical skills being lost in the individual domains of ordenance, transportation, quartermaster, ect.
Since you're in Overland Park, contact the CGSC Department of Logistics Operations at Leavenworth lots of experts there. Head to the CARL library website and I'm sure there are tons of MMAS and SAMS theses on the subject for download.
http://cgsc.leavenworth.army.mil/car...entdm/home.htm
Somewhat on topic, is anyone aware of any open-source collection of NSN's, CEOI, BII, AAL, and parts lists from -20 level manuals? Logistics is much simpler at the Company level when this stuff is available. A computer geek like me could make a program that would make change of command inventories, maintenance tracking, LOGSTATs, etc, much easier to manage. The data, last I knew, was available via FEDLOG discs (one NSN query at a time), but that was not very useful to putting together anything with mass amounts of data. I have seen a few websites that have the data, but there's no way to download the information in one shot.
Just an illustration of what one can do with this - a few years ago, I had a 50MB Access database to track our supply, maintenance, and accountability status - it would spit out the LOGSTAT, tally up the 2406 data, track our PLL and QSS inventories, and (my personal favorite) compare current and recent 5988Es with the DCR, which was a great illustration of the random pencil-whipping that the crews did on their 5988Es. Within 15 minutes of crews turning in 5988Es, I was in their platoon areas, asking "how did this get fixed without the part coming in? And what about this other fault that we got a part for two days ago - did it break again?" I could filter the information on anything according to just about any criteria (PLT, length of time, type of fault, weapon, ammo, anything). While other XOs would spend half a day jumping through their butts to respond to some random RFI from the Bn XO, I could respond in about 5 minutes. It also served the same function as my supply sergeant's ULLS box (other than the ability to enter orders). It was a handy reference on the frequent occasion that his ULLS crashed.
I don't know about logistics at higher levels, but it could be much simpler at the company level if the data were available to make a program (maybe it's an OPSEC issue?). I had to enter most of the data above manually into a spreadsheet and then import it into the database. It gave me something to do on two days of Brigade Staff Duty, but it sucked and shouldn't need to be that time-consuming - and the information occasionally changes. Programs to simplify the tasks above could be made available if the data were available. They can easily be made for a laptop or for an iPod Touch or similar device. Or has it already happened since I ETS'd?
See if you can find the Martin Van Creveld book Supplying War: Logistics from Wallenstein to Patton (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
I know a little bit about that.
In Army terms, whether the consolidation of MOSs and specialties into the "multifunctional logistician" concepts can actually work, or are critical skills being lost in the individual domains of ordenance, transportation, quartermaster, ect.
In my time, in small unit, Supply guy reports to commander, spends more time in the ops cell, The 4 shop, and BDE HQ than the supply room. This in order to help anticipate what may be logistically needed.
Could move from unit to unit and still maintain some support for the other. It's an asset and should find enough to do - always busy and taking action on things before they hit staff call tomorrow.
The skill set changes too fast through technology and the mission has become too diverse. The optempo is pretty intense and many operations are only done once.
Any discussion of logistics in this era probably requires (re)definition of Class X supplies in a more formal way.
Not specifically what you're looking for, but we use HAYSTACK Gold a lot.
Another great example, albeit limited, is MSDS Hyper Glossary.
Just the country codes help us with identifying ordnance. Someone should get this idea/catalog of yours going
If you want to blend in, take the bus
That's what I don't get. It's out there, already compiled. It just isn't available, as far as I know.Someone should get this idea/catalog of yours going
"We've got it, but it's classified so you can't have it."
Sic Bisquitus Disintegrat...
Marc W.D. Tyrrell, Ph.D.
Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies,
Senior Research Fellow,
The Canadian Centre for Intelligence and Security Studies, NPSIA
Carleton University
http://marctyrrell.com/
I used to use the LOGSA tools online as a commander. A great set of tools to find almost anything. Contains FEDLOG and many other useful tools, such as a tracker for all your document # (orders, in civilian terms). It will do Fedex like tracking on your requisitions, telling you when it leaves the DLA source and makes it into your local SSA.
https://www.logsa.army.mil/index.cfm...home.startSite
It also prevents the pilferage that occurs in the system, especially with "neat" items. As a commander, I found the NSN for some new Camelbacks for my guys. I ordered them and waited for them to come in. One day, I checked online and found the document marked as received by our SSA (distro warehouse). I sent my supply SGT down to get them. Our SSA claimed they weren't in, and the supply SGTcame back empty handed. I printed the receipt report from online and sent him back, and told him that if they didn't produce I was contacting the SPO (Support Plans Officer) immediately. The SSA suddenly found them. Amazing.
Later, I trained my XO, Supply SGT, and all my LTs to do the same. Worked on all classes of supply. The tool let me also verify that my supply sgt and PLL clerk were ordering what I requested. As a result, my company was the best supplied in the BCT. Oddly, others weren't too interested in copying us, I found it hard to convince other co's to take the time to do the same. Council member and fellow commander tankersteve had good success with the system too.
A non-military viewpoint
From an "armchair" outsider on the 'The Future of Logistics' a lot depends on whether you are considering a conventional campaign (HIC), COIN or expeditionary conflict or being at peace (in garrison)?
For all manner of reasons commitments to immediate action, whether HIC or COIN, rarely lasts a short time and along comes a far from "light" campaign logistics "tail" - with PMC and host nation(s) help of course. That is what needs to be considered - hard - and clearly presented to decision-makers. Look how long outsiders have been in Bosnia.
Can a "light" campaign be logistically supported, reliably from regional resources and the "tail" kept small? We know a "hi-tech" war is not logistically "light", just look at the two Gulf Wars.
If the US / another national defence budget was reduced - like Canada and France did - what capability for logistics is retained? Some idea of the time-scales involved in restoring capability should be in the paper.
davidbfpo
I think that David is on the right track with his discussion of tail.
And more importantly, you have to link time and logistics. Building up enough supplies for an invasion can take months. The less stuff you take the faster you can act.
Not a logistician,
but this document here, although USAF-centric, appears relevant to the discussion at hand.
I stumbled across it while searching for information on command in the RFC but immediately thought of this thread.
The only caveat I would put on it is that I am of the belief that the policy for just-in-time logistics (championed in the form of a vignette in this journal) failed to adequately sustain the US ground forces in Iraq, 2003 and was phased out as another over-hyped concept... maybe someone could confirm this?
However, in terms of historical examples and logistical bywords, I imagine this may be of some help.
http://www.aflma.hq.af.mil/lgj/old%2...202006_cor.pdf
'...the gods of war are capricious, and boldness often brings better results than reason would predict.'
Donald Kagan
Armour journal or so had a nice article some time ago - something about breaking the tether of fuel. That was a nice start.
By the way, I've got a question since the membership here is multinational:
Q: In which countries is it usual to have a detachment of the field unit at field depots to organise, reserve and prepare supplies for the truck convoys of their field units?
I'm thinking of receiving requests, preparing custom pallets full of spare parts, preparing a map of where the needed supplies are and guiding the truckers to the supplies & assist with loading/unloading?
I have the impression that this is usually not organic to field units, but rather the job of rather neutral, not so motivated supply clerks of the field depot units.
Another question:
Q: How 'normal' are convoy security units internationally?
As I understand some countries assign scouts, AT Plts and others in makeshift solutions for convoy security.
That may work half-satisfactorily in COIN, but what's about great, mobile wars?
I'll try and put some feedback here for the NZ/ commonwealth model - hopefully anyone will correct me if I go wrong.
Q: In which countries is it usual to have a detachment of the field unit at field depots to organise, reserve and prepare supplies for the truck convoys of their field units?
At the rifle company level the CQMS (Company Quatermaster - an infantry SSgt who acts as the under-study of the CSM while acting as the chief point of contact for all stores stuff) is often allocated veh/ convoys to organise and arrange for resup. Doctrinally they are supposed to stay with the F Ech (the coy) but my experience in FOBs and on exercises is that they practise a high degree of mobility, and often push themselves back to the A Ech when organising supply.
Q: How 'normal' are convoy security units internationally?
As I understand some countries assign scouts, AT Plts and others in makeshift solutions for convoy security.
That may work half-satisfactorily in COIN, but what's about great, mobile wars?
I'm not going to swear this is true, but I have spoken to both US and NZ MP's and they both believe it is their doctrinally enshrined right to escort convoys and control/ provide route security.
Now, what great insights and commentary have you got on this topic Fuchs?
Last edited by Chris jM; 01-05-2010 at 11:03 PM.
'...the gods of war are capricious, and boldness often brings better results than reason would predict.'
Donald Kagan
Posting Permissions
"A Sherman can give you a very nice... edge."- Oddball, 
Bookmarks