Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 77

Thread: Mathematics of War

  1. #1
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default Mathematics of War

    Interesting findings from Ted.com. Uses math to observe trends in the Surge in Iraq and other wars.

    Sean Gourley on the mathematics of war

    About this talk:
    By pulling raw data from the news and plotting it onto a graph, Sean Gourley and his team have come up with a stunning conclusion about the nature of modern war -- and perhaps a model for resolving conflicts.

    About Sean Gourley:
    Sean Gourley, trained as a physicist, has turned his scientific mind to analyzing data about a messier topic: modern war and conflict.

    v/r

    Mike

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    8

    Default Variation of the Frequency of Fatal Quarrels With Magnitude

    Just a heads up, what Sean finds is actually a very old result that is well-known in social science. In fact, it was first discovered about sixty years ago by a meteorologist.

    http://www.drewconway.com/zia/?p=577

    I am a bit surprised it is getting the coverage that it is.

  3. #3
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default People and numbers don't mix well. Attempts to mathematically model

    human interaction will always show patterns -- and different modelers will draw different patterns from the same data. You cannot put people in boxes IMO; you have to deal with the person or group as they are and as they constantly shift and change.

    Well, you can put 'em in boxes and rely on trends, I suppose. Seen a lot of folks do some fascinating variations on that. None successfully, as I recall...

    All things considered, though, I don't guess a Physicist playing around with the People thing is any worse than Economists trying to do that...

  4. #4
    Council Member Surferbeetle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,111

    Default Thanks...

    Drew,

    Thanks for the link, it led to the JASS site which has some interesting papers and references a book from the Springer publishing house; I enjoy some of their financial mathematical modeling series books...quality works which require a fair amount of time, but are well worth the read.

    Regards,

    Steve
    Sapere Aude

  5. #5
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Non-military West Coast
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MikeF View Post
    Sean Gourley and his team have come up with a stunning conclusion about the nature of modern war

    v/r

    Mike
    While it might be old news, it is new news to me. I thought the most stunning conclusion was that Alpha was the structure of the insurgency and this structure followed the same slope downward for all war. This means that it doesn’t matter what the structure of an insurgency looks like, it follows the same path.

    Of course, right now that slope (path) is actually moving upward for the war in Iraq, which is really bad news. It probably means that the surge worked well at first, but has now out-lived its usefulness. The surge was able to isolate the fragmented insurgency into separate orientations (that were more deadly, but less able to freely carry-out attacks) to control the number of attacks (as you said on another post, command doesn’t really have control), but then something else has happened. The insurgency has become more fragmented and more deadly.

    Because, according to the data, it doesn’t matter what the insurgency looks like, it looks like a whole new war has broken out. Sean didn’t say where, spatially, this war was taking place, but I am not sure what will keep it from spreading, if the surge didn’t work. Of course I am also assuming the US forces are trying to maintain the surge, and I may be wrong on that. It could be we are adapting to this new war or the Iraqi Security Forces have the lead.

    It doesn’t look like the Iraqi Security Forces are prepared to handle this insurgency as the Iraqi Security Forces are largely unfunded (let's hope this doesn't happen to ours) and (perhaps) unwanted.

    As I commented on Drew’s post, it doesn’t appear like our troops are ever coming home. As this new war spreads, we will simply become more and more involved. It also might be that our forces or nation doesn't understand another war has broken-out since the surge, if that is indeed what the data is telling us, and I think it is.

    If we don't understand the situation, it is very easy to get sucked-up into a very nasty one, without our vertical and horizontal forces being prepared.

    Perhaps a "fake" science, like social science, will tell you the vertical or horizontal forces don't need to know, I think that is a lie.

  6. #6
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Mid Atlantic
    Posts
    26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken White View Post
    human interaction will always show patterns -- and different modelers will draw different patterns from the same data. You cannot put people in boxes IMO; you have to deal with the person or group as they are and as they constantly shift and change.

    Well, you can put 'em in boxes and rely on trends, I suppose. Seen a lot of folks do some fascinating variations on that. None successfully, as I recall...

    All things considered, though, I don't guess a Physicist playing around with the People thing is any worse than Economists trying to do that...
    I think the military might actually benefit from applying some principles of economics. And data analysis can make sense out of seamingly unrelated events. But it can't replace common sense. It was, after all, often physicists who built mathmatical models for pricing financial products. Oops!

  7. #7
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Non-military West Coast
    Posts
    25

    Default

    "But it can't replace common sense. It was, after all, often physicists who built mathmatical models for pricing financial products. Oops!"

    True, common sense would have told us not to put that much power in the hands of greedy and unregulated bodies, but how was the physicist supposed to know? It doesn't seem related.

    Sean pretty-much just laid it out without any conclusions, as did the physicists who put the mathmatical models for pricing financial products together. It was then on a need-to-know protocol. The financial sector picked the wrong guys.
    Last edited by Larry Dunbar; 05-09-2009 at 07:00 PM.

  8. #8
    Council Member Tom Odom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    DeRidder LA
    Posts
    3,949

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Dunbar View Post
    While it might be old news, it is new news to me. I thought the most stunning conclusion was that Alpha was the structure of the insurgency and this structure followed the same slope downward for all war. This means that it doesn’t matter what the structure of an insurgency looks like, it follows the same path.

    Of course, right now that slope (path) is actually moving upward for the war in Iraq, which is really bad news. It probably means that the surge worked well at first, but has now out-lived its usefulness. The surge was able to isolate the fragmented insurgency into separate orientations (that were more deadly, but less able to freely carry-out attacks) to control the number of attacks (as you said on another post, command doesn’t really have control), but then something else has happened. The insurgency has become more fragmented and more deadly.
    Really? that would be news if it were even close to the facts on the ground. The "surge" was not a monolithic event and neither was the insurgency.

    Because, according to the data, it doesn’t matter what the insurgency looks like, it looks like a whole new war has broken out. Sean didn’t say where, spatially, this war was taking place, but I am not sure what will keep it from spreading, if the surge didn’t work. Of course I am also assuming the US forces are trying to maintain the surge, and I may be wrong on that. It could be we are adapting to this new war or the Iraqi Security Forces have the lead.
    Again that would be very interesting if it looked that way on the ground. Your assumption on the "surge" is much dated. ISF are very much in the lead.

    It doesn’t look like the Iraqi Security Forces are prepared to handle this insurgency as the Iraqi Security Forces are largely unfunded (let's hope this doesn't happen to ours) and (perhaps) unwanted.
    Who is unfunded? The ISF certainly is funded; there are issues with Iraq's budget but the ISF are hardly unfunded.

    As I commented on Drew’s post, it doesn’t appear like our troops are ever coming home. As this new war spreads, we will simply become more and more involved. It also might be that our forces or nation doesn't understand another war has broken-out since the surge, if that is indeed what the data is telling us, and I think it is.
    Again a new war as opposed to an old war? Who has issues understanding what?

    If we don't understand the situation, it is very easy to get sucked-up into a very nasty one, without our vertical and horizontal forces being prepared.

    Perhaps a "fake" science, like social science, will tell you the vertical or horizontal forces don't need to know, I think that is a lie
    I agree that understanding is mandatory; exactly what are vertical and horizontal forces?

    Do us all a favor and introduce yourself so we could put your comments in context.

    Thanks
    Tom

  9. #9
    Council Member William F. Owen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The State of Partachia, at the eastern end of the Mediterranean
    Posts
    3,947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MikeF View Post
    I'm not sure if this is a badly timed April Fool or if we are supposed to take this seriously at all.

    Seriously? What has the data he gathered go to do with the output he is showing and also how is this output insightful, useful or relevant?

    How does it describe the structure of the insurgency? He states it does but I don't see the proof.

    I am extremely interested in an explanation.
    Infinity Journal "I don't care if this works in practice. I want to see it work in theory!"

    - The job of the British Army out here is to kill or capture Communist Terrorists in Malaya.
    - If we can double the ratio of kills per contact, we will soon put an end to the shooting in Malaya.
    Sir Gerald Templer, foreword to the "Conduct of Anti-Terrorist Operations in Malaya," 1958 Edition

  10. #10
    Council Member Mark O'Neill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    307

    Default Aw, C'mon Tom

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Odom View Post
    Really? that would be news if it were even close to the facts on the ground. The "surge" was not a monolithic event and neither was the insurgency.



    Again that would be very interesting if it looked that way on the ground. Your assumption on the "surge" is much dated. ISF are very much in the lead.



    Who is unfunded? The ISF certainly is funded; there are issues with Iraq's budget but the ISF are hardly unfunded.



    Again a new war as opposed to an old war? Who has issues understanding what?



    I agree that understanding is mandatory; exactly what are vertical and horizontal forces?

    Do us all a favor and introduce yourself so we could put your comments in context.

    Thanks
    Tom
    You know the old 'horizontal and vertical force'. Surely All COIN experts use those terms ;-) don't tell me the pony soldiers don't?? gee, I am amazed... You had better get across what is happening on the ground.................:-]
    Last edited by Mark O'Neill; 05-10-2009 at 01:01 PM.

  11. #11
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default I don't know

    Quote Originally Posted by William F. Owen View Post
    I'm not sure if this is a badly timed April Fool or if we are supposed to take this seriously at all.

    Seriously? What has the data he gathered go to do with the output he is showing and also how is this output insightful, useful or relevant?

    How does it describe the structure of the insurgency? He states it does but I don't see the proof.

    I am extremely interested in an explanation.
    I posted it b/c I want to see what others felt about it. Gurley doesn't suggest any conclusions b/c he cannot. He is a physicist, not a soldier, but he did find a trend. Moreover, he's getting people across both the academic and military worlds upset, but he's getting them to think.

    I think that's a good thing- too much of our past policy was based off idealogy not reason and history. He hasn't proving anything, but he's started a discussion.

    He may not have found anything, but I don't think that he should be dismissed as irrelevant. The next step is to gather more data and test it. Using econometrics(statistics on crack), one can determine if his equation is useful or simply luck.

    And he has a cool accent.

    I'm on my Emerson kick right now. We'll see where it leads. Here's what he says,

    All science has one aim, namely, to find a theory of nature. We have theories of races and of functions, but scarcely yet a remote approach to an idea of creation. We are now so far from the road to truth, that religious leaders dispute and hate each other, and speculative men are esteemed unsound and frivolous. But to a sound judgment, the most abstract truth is the most practical. Whenever a true theory appears, it will be its own evidence. Its test is that it will explain all phenomena
    In truth, undoubtedly we have no questions to ask which are unanswerable. We must trust the perfection of the creation so far, as to believe that whatever curiosity the order of things has awakened in our minds, the order of things can satisfy. Every man’s condition is a solution in hieroglyphic to those inquiries he would put. He acts it as life, before he apprehends it as truth. In like manner, nature is already, in its forms and tendencies, describing its own design. Let us interrogate the great apparition that shines so peacefully around us. Let us inquire, to what end is nature?
    v/r

    Mike
    Last edited by MikeF; 05-10-2009 at 02:54 PM.

  12. #12
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default Time

    Here's another way to look at it abstract as it is.

    Time

    In times of doubt
    In times of fear
    In times of anger
    In due time

    Simply a wave
    in the ocean
    of what we call
    time

    Searching
    Striving
    for nothing
    and everything

    Paradox,
    but is it?
    Because we simply cannot comprehend
    the Creator's equation

    If we would only simply listen
    to what she has to say
    Maybe one day
    In due time

    v/r

    Mike

  13. #13
    Council Member Surferbeetle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,111

    Default Most of America already benefits from mathematical modeling and simulation

    Mathematical modeling and simulation (war gaming) allows anybody who is willing to spend the time, effort, or resources to cost effectively examine various scenarios. From this examination one can develop probable costs, schedules, and benchmarks associated with a particular endeavor and chose the one most likely to result in success. As with any methodology, advice derived from mathematical modeling and simulation does not give a leader a magic pass to ignore common sense nor is it to be feared as voodoo magic whose use will consign our souls to the lowest circles of hell.

    America as a whole understands the importance of war-gaming at a very deep level; note our world-renowned college educational system and until recently, our possession of the worlds strongest financial system. Our college system consistently explores the concepts of mathematical modeling and simulation in associate through graduate educational programs in business, engineering, finance, and manufacturing – all disciplines that are crucial to a nations ability to survive and thrive. When the immediate dust of the current financial debacle settles, I expect that we will still have the strongest financial system...however we have permanently damaged ourselves and it will take time and effort to recover.

    The Economists 2009 Pocket World in Figures ranks economies by GDP in USD:
    1. America 13,164 billion
    2. Japan 4,368 billion
    3. Germany 2,897
    4. China 2,645 billion
    5. United Kingdom 2,377 billion

    In the US military the Air Force and Navy have taken a page from the successes of the civilian world (and of course vice versa) and worked to incorporate the use of mathematical modeling and simulation into their daily operations. We in much of the US Army still prefer to war game things in the physical world: our Combat Training Centers are heavily resourced examples of this preference. We in the Army are slowly, when compared to my civilian experiences, moving in the direction of incorporating mathematical modeling and simulation into our TTP’s. This journey will take time, have setbacks, and generally be a PITA however when balanced against the adapt or die imperative it’s an easy choice to make.

    @ Mike F. - Thanks for starting the discussion and providing the Ted link.
    Last edited by Surferbeetle; 05-10-2009 at 05:09 PM.
    Sapere Aude

  14. #14
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default Charlie don't surf

    But, I do. I believe that we are at one of those times in history where the decisions we make will effect our future. It is simply a matter on how we act or react. For your consideration. This narrative is simply one way of looking at today's world.

    v/r

    Mike

    I think you ought to know, dear brothers, about the hard time we went through in Asia. We were really crushed and overwhelmed, and feared we would never live through it. We felt we were doomed to die and saw how powerless we were to help ourselves; but that was good, for then we put everything into the hands of God, who alone could save us, for He can even raise the dead. And He did help us, and saved us from a terrible death; yes, and we can expect him to do it again.
    -Apostle Paul and Timothy's letter to Corinth

    Today's world seems chaotic, confusing, and uncontrollable- terrorism, economic upheaval, flu pandemics, insurgencies, narco-insurgencies, and failed/failing states. In these times of perceived crisis, some use fear to push individual agendas while others are overcome by greed and manipulate events for pursuit of gluttony. Conversely, leaders, commanders, and statesmen have taken action during these times to push projects of progress to better serve the common good.

    We are in such a time now, and we need to consider how we will act. In the big ocean that scopes and frames what we call human history, time, matter, and space, waves ebbs and flow in a perfect pattern. Every generation or two, deep within the depths of darkness along the ocean's floor, the earth shifts and quakes in a bifurcation point, and the energy produced forms a tsunami.

    We are in such a time now. It is neither good nor bad, better or worse. It just is. Paradoxically, today is the same as yesterday. It is simply a matter of how we feel and think about it.

    The arithematics of life I suppose. If it is possible to measure nature in math, if it is possible to send a man to the moon and beyond, then it maybe possible to develop laws of social sciences if the creator allows us to see his equations.

    Today, I see opportunity, but it is more than that- I am pondering and dreaming of the world that my great-great grandchildren will inherit. Will they be conscripted in an occupational army trying to maintain the American Empire? Will they work as social entrepeneurs trying to educate the illiterate, feed the hungry, house the homeless, and employ the unemployed? Will they live in a police state as the Department of Homeland Security attempts to control thoughts in fear of a terrorist attack? Will they be studying the former United States of America in their textbooks? I wander and wonder.

    "But, My son, be warned: there is no end of opinions ready to be expressed. Studying them can go on forever and become very exhausting!" (Ecclesiastes 12:12 LB).
    Last edited by MikeF; 05-10-2009 at 06:42 PM.

  15. #15
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default But....

    We routinely disqualify testimony that would plead for extenuation. That is, we are so persuaded of the rightness of our judgement as to invalidate evidence that does not confirm us in it. Nothing that deserves to be called truth could ever be arrived at by such means.
    -Marilynne Robinson, The Death of Adam

    There are times when you choose to believe something that would normally be considered absolutely irrational. It doesn't mean that it is actually irrational, but it is surely not rational. Perhaps it is suprarationality: reason beyond the normal definitions of fact or data-based logic; something that makes sense only if you can see a bigger picture of reality. Maybe that is where faith fits in. -Wm. Paul Young, The Shack
    so in the middle you have a paradox...I'm still in the middle...

    v/r

    Mike

  16. #16
    Council Member William F. Owen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The State of Partachia, at the eastern end of the Mediterranean
    Posts
    3,947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MikeF View Post
    I posted it b/c I want to see what others felt about it. Gurley doesn't suggest any conclusions b/c he cannot. He is a physicist, not a soldier, but he did find a trend. Moreover, he's getting people across both the academic and military worlds upset, but he's getting them to think
    .
    Mike, good job posting it. I think it merits attention, but having given it some I am less than impressed.

    I think that's a good thing- too much of our past policy was based off idealogy not reason and history. He hasn't proving anything, but he's started a discussion.
    Well the field of military data and statistics is vast. Despite what he says, I am 99% sure the Pentagon has done the same analysis, and found it generates nothing useful. The discussion is probably more about the relevance and utility of this work rather than if it tells us anything new or insightful, but I am not closed minded in such things.

    I would however me more than slightly wary as to the degree of self promotion that seems to be at work.

    And he has a cool accent.
    He's a New Zealander!! Wait till you hear my accent.
    Infinity Journal "I don't care if this works in practice. I want to see it work in theory!"

    - The job of the British Army out here is to kill or capture Communist Terrorists in Malaya.
    - If we can double the ratio of kills per contact, we will soon put an end to the shooting in Malaya.
    Sir Gerald Templer, foreword to the "Conduct of Anti-Terrorist Operations in Malaya," 1958 Edition

  17. #17
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Non-military West Coast
    Posts
    25

    Default The Displacement of Energy

    “exactly what are vertical and horizontal forces?”

    War has been defined by many descriptions, but it simply is the displacement of energy, from one orientation into another. This is the main reason the power-law distribution applies to war. There are two forms of energy inside every displacement, kinetic and potential. Kinetic energy has mostly a component of Vertical force, while potential energy has mostly a component of horizontal force. Together the vertical and horizontal forces move the displacement from potential to kinetic and back again. It works in a loop and that loop, to some, is called an OODA loop.

    Vertical forces are the forces that the horizontal forces of a country are able to support. The horizontal force is the amount of force between you and I, which is growing. Actually, the horizontal force is the amount of force a society has between its past and future, but it is not always (never) figured in that way.

    Force at a distance is the definition of energy. When the vertical force moves, the distance from one country to another, it is called kinetic energy. The amount of power, energy per second, a country can throw at another country depends on how much vertical force the horizontal force can support, @ the distance and over time.

    My guess why the power-law distribution “works” in Iraq or any war is that Alpha describes the structure of the insurgency and that structure, in Iraq, represents the orientation on the other side of the power curve of the US, and to a degree the Iraqi Security Forces. The Data is not for a particular orientation (religious, warlords, tribes, or thugs) only that orientation opposing the new Orientation. I capitalized the last Orientation because it represents the second "O" in the OODA loop (Orientation is what a vertical force does after it Penetrates the Observed environment of another displacement; it Isolates the displacement into Orientations, isolation does not always mean: to kill).

  18. #18
    Council Member William F. Owen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The State of Partachia, at the eastern end of the Mediterranean
    Posts
    3,947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Dunbar View Post
    War has been defined by many descriptions, but it simply is the displacement of energy, from one orientation into another. This is the main reason the power-law distribution applies to war. There are two forms of energy inside every displacement, kinetic and potential. Kinetic energy has mostly a component of Vertical force, while potential energy has mostly a component of horizontal force. Together the vertical and horizontal forces move the displacement from potential to kinetic and back again. It works in a loop and that loop, to some, is called an OODA loop.
    I don't follow that at all, and which OODA loop are you talking about? Boyd's and if so which iteration of the loop?

    Plus I don't remember Boyd mentioning any of the aspects you are talking about relating to the OODA loop, which as far as I know was entirely cognitive.
    Infinity Journal "I don't care if this works in practice. I want to see it work in theory!"

    - The job of the British Army out here is to kill or capture Communist Terrorists in Malaya.
    - If we can double the ratio of kills per contact, we will soon put an end to the shooting in Malaya.
    Sir Gerald Templer, foreword to the "Conduct of Anti-Terrorist Operations in Malaya," 1958 Edition

  19. #19
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default Mett-tc

    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Dunbar View Post
    “exactly what are vertical and horizontal forces?”

    War has been defined by many descriptions, but it simply is the displacement of energy, from one orientation into another. This is the main reason the power-law distribution applies to war. There are two forms of energy inside every displacement, kinetic and potential. Kinetic energy has mostly a component of Vertical force, while potential energy has mostly a component of horizontal force. Together the vertical and horizontal forces move the displacement from potential to kinetic and back again. It works in a loop and that loop, to some, is called an OODA loop.
    In the military world, we call this METT-TC. If you look at a state as a homeostatic system, then you may be able forecast how that system will change when you introduce "new" energy or external forces into it.

    Wilf- this understanding is intuitive to you, Ken, etc, but it is not intuitive to most. Science can provide another lens to help explain it.

    For example, Iraq circa 2002 was stable in Iraqi terms. They had a nice dictator, and things worked. There were no suicide bombers (i think). The radical Islamist plotting to ovethrow the government in places like Turki Village were marginalized, etc.

    We decided that we should overthrow the natural order of thngs. We ASSUMED that after we took over, we coulld hold elections, and little americans would emerge from the ashes. We assumed that we could undertake such a venture with minimal force and cost. We were wrong. Our planning was based off ideology, not reason and historical fact.

    I think we can do better in the future, but we have to apply the physical sciences along with the social sciences.

    Gurley may be an opportunist, but I'm developing theories along similar lines that may help us to better plan and prosecute future interventions.

    Larry's analogy to the displacement of energy has merit if you apply it to societies. Not sure about the OODA loop thing though.

    v/r

    Mike

  20. #20
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,021

    Default Metaphors ....

    may be useful to an individual in helping that person visualize a situation (let us say, war) to which the metaphor does not directly apply. E.g., Larry sees war as a matter of statics and dynamics - based on an engineering education.

    Wilf see things in a very military context - based on an education in practical warfare - and he also has read and written much in that context. He does not need metaphors.

    I suppose one could look at an "armed conflict" (let us say, Iraq) as akin to a problem in biochemical reaction kinetics - introduction of forces, energy and catalysts (don't forget them) into a homeostatic system (as MikeF suggests).

    At least, we would be dealing with a living system there (and a lot of cool graphs, showing what works and what does not). But what does that add ? - except to the understanding of the individual who has developed the metaphor.

    More generally, we see engineering concepts such as mass introduced into the "equations" of war (e.g., MOOSEMUSS). Now to a engineering-scientific type (and yes, I do have a good degree in that area with some grad work), mass itself doesn't say much (so many particles of a defined substance).

    But, there are some formulations which include mass: e.g, weight, vector forces, momentum, center of gravity, energy (after all, E=mc^2=nuks), that are used (sometimes usefully, sometimes not) as metaphors in the military art by its professionals. And, of course, we have CvC's fogs and frictions used as metaphors by him.

    Sometimes metaphors are useful to groups of people, as well as to the individual. But, they also introduce terminology which has to be explained - and which can simply clutter up the picture and actually retard mutual understanding.

    Admittedly, metaphors can be fun[*], but in the end you have to get down to the things which you actually do in your art and profession.

    So, I guess I come down more on Wilf's side of the ledger - despite having little differences such as whether flying airliners into buildings can be classed as military operations in the context of an armed conflict.

    ---------------------
    [*] e.g., waves and surfing - or my now deceased colleague's maxim: "You have to roll with the flow." He was an artist; I am a technician - the maxim applies to both kinds of trial lawyers; but both end up expressing what counts in factual and legal terms.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •