Results 1 to 20 of 145

Thread: Bunker and tank busters at section/squad and platoon level

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    33

    Default

    The problem with a computerized sight on an unguided weapon is that, while your claimed effective range is 600m, the hit percentage drops significantly the further out you go. Hitting moving targets is an exercise in (now computerized) educated guesswork.

    OTOH, guided weapons have less of a hit chance drop off as range increases.

    Just seems like if you could build a CLU that was lighter than Javelin and use a large range of existing unguided and guided munitions (60mm, 90mm, 110mm, maybe 124mm with HEAT, bunker buster, HESH, timed-airburst), you could more effectively tailor munition to METT-TC.

    One would also hope it'd be a lot less expensive than the Javelin CLU/missile combo.

  2. #2
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    99

    Default

    And for the readers who don't understand military acronyms METT-TC means?

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GI Zhou View Post
    And for the readers who don't understand military acronyms METT-TC means?
    Mission, Enemy, Terrain and weather, Troops and support available, Time available, Civil considerations.

    http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...5.htm#par2-1-1

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •