Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: New Carbine Competition

  1. #1
    Council Member gute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    322

    Default New Carbine Competition

    Army talking about a new carbine - again.

    http://www.armytimes.com/news/2010/0..._mods_032110w/

    Colt has a new rifle, CM901, but I have not found pictures of the rifle.

  2. #2
    Council Member Kiwigrunt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Auckland New Zealand
    Posts
    467

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gute View Post
    Army talking about a new carbine - again.

    http://www.armytimes.com/news/2010/0..._mods_032110w/

    Colt has a new rifle, CM901, but I have not found pictures of the rifle.
    Here it is.
    Nothing that results in human progress is achieved with unanimous consent. (Christopher Columbus)

    All great truth passes through three stages: first it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
    (Arthur Schopenhauer)

    ONWARD

  3. #3
    Council Member nichols's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Stafford Virginia
    Posts
    290

    Default

    Colt was at Modern Day Marine last week with the CM-901, they ket it locked up and in pelican case. they only brang it to show the Commandant. I couldn't talk him into getting a look at it.

    Colt is submitting 6 different carbines for the competition, the most interesting one that I saw and monkeyed around with was the hybrid; it is a mix between a piston and direct impingement gas system.

  4. #4
    Council Member 120mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Wonderland
    Posts
    1,284

    Default

    Maintenance and training is still broke. Buying a new system will not fix that.

    Interchangeable configurations sounds nice, but the Army culture will not allow that to become useful any time soon due to "uniformity" and "accountability" standards.

    In the end, none of the proposed systems will be a substantial improvement over the M4, except for the upgrades; and they will be an improvement only as long as it takes the broken maintenance and training system to wear them out, and then we'll be right back to square one.

  5. #5
    Council Member carl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Denver on occasion
    Posts
    2,460

    Default

    This may be off topic and may have been covered previously, if so forgive me, but what about the G11 rifle the Germans developed? From my civilian viewpoint it seemed a good thing.

    See:http://www.hkpro.com/index.php?optio...types&Itemid=5
    Last edited by davidbfpo; 10-08-2010 at 06:19 AM. Reason: Link added
    "We fight, get beat, rise, and fight again." Gen. Nathanael Greene

  6. #6
    Council Member gute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    322

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by carl View Post
    This may be off topic and may have been covered previously, if so forgive me, but what about the G11 rifle the Germans developed? From my civilian viewpoint it seemed a good thing.

    See:http://www.hkpro.com/index.php?optio...types&Itemid=5
    From what I've read the Germans shelved it when the wall went down.

    The AAI Corporation is developing caseless and cased telescoped ammo. I've been following the development of this ammo for the last couple of years - very interesting. In conjunction with the ammo, AAI or the LSAT program has developed a light machine gun and now an assault rifle. Here's a link.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LSAT_caseless_ammunition

  7. #7
    Council Member carl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Denver on occasion
    Posts
    2,460

    Default

    I believe the Germans gave up on it not because it didn't work, but because the Cold War had ended and they didn't feel like going through the effort of fielding a new rifle when "history had ended". It already used caseless telescoped ammo. I just can't understand why we keep tinkering with the M-16 when something quite novel and seemingly much more effective already exists. Is there something fundamentally wrong with it?

    David: Thanks for adding the link.
    "We fight, get beat, rise, and fight again." Gen. Nathanael Greene

  8. #8
    Council Member Jslade0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    12

    Default

    why did the XM8 get canned? It seemed pretty useful.

  9. #9
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default Because the XM8 was an end run around the procurement bureaucracy.

    So they got it killed. It did have some mechanical problems. The M4 isn't great but its adequate and the cost of change is humungous. Not worth it for a very slight improvement...

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-09-2007, 02:15 PM
  2. 2006 Commander's Special Topics Writing Competition
    By SWJED in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-13-2006, 12:21 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •