Ken,
I am in 100% agreement with you. Here is how I treated Mazarr's piece at the Lowy Institute's blog, The Interpreter, a few weeks ago:
http://www.lowyinterpreter.org/post/....aspx#continue
The rigour of thought displayed, understanding of the subject matter and the quality of the 'logic' was sadly lacking.
What is of equal concern to me is the fact that the article would have been peer reviewed. Material like this leaves those of use in the Military/ Strat / Academic community with little ground to stand on when we want be to be critcial of of dodgy reporting and analysis by journalists. If the 'professionals' are so inane, what hope others?
Cheers
Mark
Bookmarks