Quote Originally Posted by JMA View Post
It started with the introduction of females and as they expanded across the military so did sexual tension levels, pregnancy rates and very sadly sexual molestation and rape incidence. The military handled the introduction of women badly (remember Tailhook) and the precedent is now set for gays.

In most armies there is much consensual heterosexual sex going on and now there is no way to prevent similar levels of openly gay sex.

It is the sexual tension that will build in these all male environments that threaten moral and operational function and not the mere presence of females or gays in the military.

As I stated earlier in this DADT discussion standby for the first gay version of Tailhook '91. This is not good for the military.
Women were in the US military well before Tailhook. I suggest you do just a touch of research before flinging out events that you feel justify your position.