Results 1 to 20 of 136

Thread: The Era of Living Dangerously

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #22
    Council Member slapout9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,818

    Default Part 2

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken White View Post
    While I don't agree with Marx on capital and its evils, he wasn't totally out to lunch economically speaking -- politically, he was just overly hopeful.
    Politically.....he was nuts

    Economically his market value theory vs. his labor value theory was spot on and I never new why people thought it was bad or radical. All the man said was. Some People make Products to make Profits/Some People make PAPER to make Profits. Whenever the right side becomes unbalanced (make more money with Paper as opposed to Products) the people will rise up. I could never understand what is so radical or un-American about that? To me that is exactly the problem we have today. Marx was not really anti-business.....he was anti-Wall Street bank. His solution was to Nationalize the banking system to SUPPORT Production(business). You have to have Production before you can have Consumption. Never understood the big deal myself. "Ike" understood it perfectly.
    Last edited by slapout9; 08-24-2011 at 06:14 PM. Reason: stuff

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-07-2009, 01:14 PM
  2. Hakim-Sadr Pact: A New Era in Shiite Politics?
    By tequila in forum Who is Fighting Whom? How and Why?
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-10-2008, 05:39 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •