AP---here is the hole in your Russia/US thoughts that an aircraft carrier can maneuver through.
Right now Russia operates on a two track process; 1) one track is the maintaining of legally binding business agreements which they hold to even if they go over the cliff and 2) they "use" to hold to signed international treaties/agreements and or memorandums signed since 1994.
I have probably as none on this thread have--- worked closely with the Russian Peacekeeping Brigade Staff/Russia National Military Academy and one of their BNs during to two major command/staff exercises in 2012 and 2013 and wrote together with the Russians a joint Brigade operations concept together with the related joint reporting concepts. Hours and hours of massive negotiations in four days over sometimes the definitions of single words.
By the way I was the first here in SWJ to state cut all joint military planning, exercises and joint education programs---immediately which was done by DoD.
At the end of the planning sessions a joint PowerPoint briefing would be signed and that established for the Russians an "agreement" that they would hold to during any future meetings and if we changed something then they would wave the "signed agreement" and conduct what I would state was subtle pressure on us to come back to the "agreement".
So you see they place "great faith" in agreements so why have they been since 2012 constantly violating them?
Back to their holding to signed agreements since 1994---the current hardliners as well as Putin are adamant in overturning all signed agreements since 94 as they view those agreements to have been pushed on a "weak" Russia and not fitting for a superpower.
If you actually go back and really seriously look at Putin's actions on each and every previously signed agreement he has either violated them , side stepped them, ignored them or demanded they be renegotiated.
Since 2008---the INF, the Memorandum on the Ukraine, the OSCE disarmament agreements, invaded Georgia, and Moldavia taken the Crimea and entered into eastern Ukraine. So AP what your call that track record?---a friendly inclined nice to work with country or simply a rouge country which ignores all agreements and one who does not care what the world thinks?
Now not knowing what world you come from but that defines a rouge country if you finally go back to the Wikipedia definition that I asked you to accept and if not then modify.
So why if a rouge country is not accepting international agreements, annexes territory when the rest of Europe has since 1994 moved on and actually shells and crosses troops into the Ukraine which some would call an invasion in any language.
Now explain to me how you would treat a rouge country as shown above other than through isolation until such time as the current leadership either wakes up and or continues on the path.
What would you have as a functional relationship with a country that is basically a developing second world country which has two raw resources and nuclear weapons -- while claiming they can assist us in the international world problems such as Syria where they even blocked humanitarian assistance, Iran, and North Korea---what as been achieved with Russia assistance---exactly just what agreements have come out of Russian assistance?
Did you read the INF article I posted and have you read the new Russian nuclear doctrine since 2012?---Now explain to me if the Russian leadership "sounds" normal in their view of the world?
Bookmarks