Actually I disagree with this position. It may seem minor.
"He" has the right to oppose the war.
"You" have the right to support the war.
If you oppose his opposition you add nothing to the debate and define your argument by his opposition. This fails to provide discourse and into the vacuum of errant ideas only fallacious logic will fall. The debate will quickly turn to an attack of the person rather than a discussion of the ideas.
Bookmarks