Quote Originally Posted by OUTLAW 09 View Post
Russian propaganda 4Ds---dismiss, distract, distort, dismay designed to create 2Ds—distrust and doubt.

So which one of the 4Ds is the Russian BUK manufacturer attempting to use???

Reference Russian BUK shot down of MH17—now Russia is having the BUK manufacturer explaining WHY it could not have been a “Russian BUK”—kind of like having the NSA explain “we do not sweep the entire internet”.

Not a single Russian official and or BUK have exactly explained WHO that BUK seen being transported back to Russia belonged to—to this day they have not been able to explain it. Other than it was the “Ukrainians”.

After the recent social media indicating the fake satellite photos done by the Russian MoD Russia is getting highly concerned about the final Dutch investigation report due out in October 2015 and are trying to be preemptive.

Buk manufacturer to explain why accusations of MH17 shoot-down unfair. Ever heard the expression, when you're in a hole, stop digging?

MH17 analysis by BUK missile maker showing BUK could not possibly have been responsible: media conference now pic.twitter.com/mfyK8wJGj6

Almaty-Antey Director Novikov: We will prove absolute non-involvement in #MH17 with "new evidence." And so it begins. pic.twitter.com/4B4XVxMEYL

'We used our experience including 2001 Ukraine shootdown of Russian airliner to analyze MH17 cirumstances': BUK missile maker

Lots of charts and graphs. pic.twitter.com/HMiSuYXlpE

Almaz-Antey showing what it claims to be evidence that Ukrainian Buk M1 downed #MH17. pic.twitter.com/pKLX9kDJud

They show plane again. Plane! pic.twitter.com/RrzhZChwv5

Eliot Higgins @EliotHiggins
I'm expecting some pretty amazing doublethink coming from the SU-25 truthers #MH17

Yep, the SU-25 era is officially over. Let the ukrainian BUK time begin

Report by "Russian military engineers" mysteriously leaked last month blamed MH17 on a Ukrainian Buk M1. http://www.novayagazeta.ru/inquests/68332.html

Eliot Higgins @EliotHiggins
Looks like the SU-25 truthers will finally have to admit they were wrong all along.
Social media open source analysts debunked this Russian BUK myth today inside of 20 minutes BUT it seems western mainstream is by definition just an extension of Russian informational warfare--do they not do fact checking any more????

.@AP & @YahooNews propagate Kremlin propaganda on #MH17.
http://news.yahoo.com/russian-missil...104254947.html
cc: @bellingcat pic.twitter.com/STNvcARaWO

RU report on "rebels" shooting down #MH17 [when they thought it was Ukrainian]:
http://ria.ru/world/20140717/1016409306.html
Archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20150602...016409306.html

.@XSovietNews And don't forget Strelkov admitted they'd just shot down a plane on July 17th, quickly deleted later. pic.twitter.com/NPdbpIl7l1

Both the June Kursk convoy Buk and the "rebel" Buk were armed with 9M38M1missiles (that Almaz-Antei says hit MH17). pic.twitter.com/DLzYCLOFZ2